Effect of intravenous lignocaine infusion on propofol requirement using a closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system: A randomised controlled study.

IF 2.9 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_830_24
Jijo Francis, Goverdhan D Puri, Tanvir Samra, Vighnesh Ashok, Rajarajan Ganesan
{"title":"Effect of intravenous lignocaine infusion on propofol requirement using a closed-loop anaesthesia delivery system: A randomised controlled study.","authors":"Jijo Francis, Goverdhan D Puri, Tanvir Samra, Vighnesh Ashok, Rajarajan Ganesan","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_830_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Closed-loop anaesthesia delivery systems (CLADS) have made total intravenous anaesthesia easier, safer and more precise. lignocaine is a local anaesthetic with analgesic properties. This study aimed to compare the consumption of propofol and fentanyl delivered using CLADS in patients administered intraoperative lignocaine infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomised trial, 70 females (18-60 years) undergoing elective breast surgery between March 2021 and December 2022 were randomised into two groups: a group administered lignocaine (1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion of 2 mg/kg/h) and a placebo group. In both groups, propofol was administered using CLADS with a target bispectral index (BIS) set at 50 and an initial set fentanyl concentration of 2 ng/ml. The data were analysed using measures of central tendency and dispersion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total consumption of propofol (mg/kg/h) was 6.0 [standard deviation (SD): 1.4] [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.54, 6.46] in the lignocaine group and 6.2 (SD: 1.7) (95% CI: 5.64, 6.76) in the placebo group (<i>P</i> = 0.719). The mean dose of propofol (mg/kg) to achieve target BIS of 50 at induction was 2.00 (SD: 0.39) (95% CI: 1.87, 2.13) in the lignocaine group and 1.95 (SD: 0.38) (95% CI: 1.82, 2.08) in the placebo group (<i>P</i> = 0.515). The total dose of intraoperative fentanyl, as well as the performance parameters of CLADS (Median Performance Error, Median Absolute Performance Error and Wobble), time to extubation, time to rescue analgesia and duration of post-anaesthesia care unit stay were similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant additive anaesthetic or analgesic effects of intraoperative lignocaine given during breast surgery, where anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, fentanyl and nitrous oxide.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"69 6","pages":"587-593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_830_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Closed-loop anaesthesia delivery systems (CLADS) have made total intravenous anaesthesia easier, safer and more precise. lignocaine is a local anaesthetic with analgesic properties. This study aimed to compare the consumption of propofol and fentanyl delivered using CLADS in patients administered intraoperative lignocaine infusion.

Methods: In this randomised trial, 70 females (18-60 years) undergoing elective breast surgery between March 2021 and December 2022 were randomised into two groups: a group administered lignocaine (1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion of 2 mg/kg/h) and a placebo group. In both groups, propofol was administered using CLADS with a target bispectral index (BIS) set at 50 and an initial set fentanyl concentration of 2 ng/ml. The data were analysed using measures of central tendency and dispersion.

Results: The mean total consumption of propofol (mg/kg/h) was 6.0 [standard deviation (SD): 1.4] [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.54, 6.46] in the lignocaine group and 6.2 (SD: 1.7) (95% CI: 5.64, 6.76) in the placebo group (P = 0.719). The mean dose of propofol (mg/kg) to achieve target BIS of 50 at induction was 2.00 (SD: 0.39) (95% CI: 1.87, 2.13) in the lignocaine group and 1.95 (SD: 0.38) (95% CI: 1.82, 2.08) in the placebo group (P = 0.515). The total dose of intraoperative fentanyl, as well as the performance parameters of CLADS (Median Performance Error, Median Absolute Performance Error and Wobble), time to extubation, time to rescue analgesia and duration of post-anaesthesia care unit stay were similar in both groups.

Conclusion: There were no significant additive anaesthetic or analgesic effects of intraoperative lignocaine given during breast surgery, where anaesthesia was maintained with propofol, fentanyl and nitrous oxide.

使用闭环麻醉系统静脉输注利多卡因对异丙酚需求量的影响:一项随机对照研究。
背景和目的:闭环麻醉输送系统(CLADS)使全静脉麻醉更容易、更安全、更精确。利多卡因是一种具有镇痛作用的局部麻醉剂。本研究旨在比较术中输注利多卡因的患者使用CLADS输注异丙酚和芬太尼的消耗。方法:在这项随机试验中,70名在2021年3月至2022年12月期间接受选择性乳房手术的女性(18-60岁)被随机分为两组:一组给予利多卡因(1.5 mg/kg,随后输注2mg /kg/h),另一组给予安慰剂。在两组中,丙泊酚使用CLADS给药,目标双谱指数(BIS)设定为50,初始芬太尼浓度为2 ng/ml。使用集中趋势和离散度对数据进行分析。结果:利多卡因组异丙酚的平均总消耗量(mg/kg/h)为6.0[标准差(SD): 1.4][95%可信区间(CI): 5.54, 6.46],安慰剂组为6.2 (SD: 1.7) (95% CI: 5.64, 6.76) (P = 0.719)。诱导时达到BIS目标50的异丙酚平均剂量(mg/kg)在利多卡因组为2.00 (SD: 0.39) (95% CI: 1.87, 2.13),在安慰剂组为1.95 (SD: 0.38) (95% CI: 1.82, 2.08) (P = 0.515)。两组患者术中芬太尼总剂量、CLADS性能参数(中位性能误差、中位绝对性能误差和Wobble)、拔管时间、抢救镇痛时间和麻醉后护理单位停留时间相似。结论:在乳房手术中,术中给予利多卡因无明显的辅助麻醉或镇痛作用,并与异丙酚、芬太尼和氧化亚氮维持麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信