Steven Robinson, Alyssa B Klein, Stephen A Stanhope, Kathryn Evans, Mark Agulnik
{"title":"Real-world survival outcomes and MDM2 prevalence in US patients with metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma.","authors":"Steven Robinson, Alyssa B Klein, Stephen A Stanhope, Kathryn Evans, Mark Agulnik","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2502319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist regarding dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) treatment, biomarker frequency, and clinical outcomes. Additional epidemiological data are needed to inform clinical trial design for testing novel therapeutics.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective data from a US-based deidentified clinico-genomic database were analyzed for patients treated for metastatic DDLPS between 2011 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and time to next treatment (TTNT) were described in the overall cohort (<i>n</i> = 51) and in a subgroup of patients with murine double minute 2 (<i>MDM2</i>) amplification and wild-type tumor protein p53 (<i>TP53</i> WT) (<i>n</i> = 38, 74.5%). Patients had a median age of 64.8 years, and 62.7% were male. The most common first-line treatment was doxorubicin with olaratumab (23.5%). From time of first-line (1 L) treatment, median OS for the entire cohort and <i>MDM2</i>-amplified, <i>TP53</i> WT subgroup was 12.6 and 11.7 months, respectively; median rwPFS was 2.5 months for both. Median TTNT was 3.9 months for the full cohort and 4.8 months for the <i>MDM2</i>-amplified, <i>TP53</i> WT subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The descriptive analysis here contributes real-world data describing treatment patterns, biomarker status, and clinical outcomes for patients with DDLPS, an aggressive and poorly characterized form of LPS with limited treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1797-1807"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2502319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Limited data exist regarding dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) treatment, biomarker frequency, and clinical outcomes. Additional epidemiological data are needed to inform clinical trial design for testing novel therapeutics.
Materials and methods: Retrospective data from a US-based deidentified clinico-genomic database were analyzed for patients treated for metastatic DDLPS between 2011 and 2021.
Results: Overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and time to next treatment (TTNT) were described in the overall cohort (n = 51) and in a subgroup of patients with murine double minute 2 (MDM2) amplification and wild-type tumor protein p53 (TP53 WT) (n = 38, 74.5%). Patients had a median age of 64.8 years, and 62.7% were male. The most common first-line treatment was doxorubicin with olaratumab (23.5%). From time of first-line (1 L) treatment, median OS for the entire cohort and MDM2-amplified, TP53 WT subgroup was 12.6 and 11.7 months, respectively; median rwPFS was 2.5 months for both. Median TTNT was 3.9 months for the full cohort and 4.8 months for the MDM2-amplified, TP53 WT subgroup.
Conclusions: The descriptive analysis here contributes real-world data describing treatment patterns, biomarker status, and clinical outcomes for patients with DDLPS, an aggressive and poorly characterized form of LPS with limited treatment options.
期刊介绍:
Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community.
The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.