Long COVID-19 and longer sick leave: longitudinal study of economically active patients.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00769-2024
Virginia Gallo González, Daniel López-Padilla, Javier de Miguel Díez, Sergio Suárez Escudero, Elena Ojeda Castillejo, Zichen Ji, Luis Puente Maestu
{"title":"Long COVID-19 and longer sick leave: longitudinal study of economically active patients.","authors":"Virginia Gallo González, Daniel López-Padilla, Javier de Miguel Díez, Sergio Suárez Escudero, Elena Ojeda Castillejo, Zichen Ji, Luis Puente Maestu","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00769-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sick leave was one of the numerous consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the relevance of occupational status for any individual, the aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of persistent symptoms after active infection and determine factors associated with longer sick leaves (LSLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study focused on economically active patients attending a post-COVID outpatient clinic for persistence of symptoms or radiological alterations after active infection. The LSL temporal cut-off point was defined by the third tertile of total leave days. Median leave time was compared with the optimal sick leave time for any other viral pneumonia, estimated by the local Ministry of Employment. To determine factors associated with LSL, multivariate models were ultilised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 248 patients were included. The median sick leave time for the entire population was 53 days (interquartile range (IQR) 37.0-126.5), global sum of 30 169 days; the median optimal sick leave time was 21.9 days (IQR 19.7-25.9) (p<0.05). The third tertile cut-off point for LSL was 83 days and multivariate analysis showed a significant association with dyspnoea (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.59-6.70, p=0.0001), while physical exercise of at least 10 min·day<sup>-1</sup> was significantly associated with shorter sick leave durations (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.98, p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>COVID-19 sick leave was considerably longer than that stipulated for nonsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral pneumonia. Long-COVID syndrome, especially dyspnoea, seems to be a very present factor in these patients' inability to work.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00769-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sick leave was one of the numerous consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the relevance of occupational status for any individual, the aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of persistent symptoms after active infection and determine factors associated with longer sick leaves (LSLs).

Methods: This observational study focused on economically active patients attending a post-COVID outpatient clinic for persistence of symptoms or radiological alterations after active infection. The LSL temporal cut-off point was defined by the third tertile of total leave days. Median leave time was compared with the optimal sick leave time for any other viral pneumonia, estimated by the local Ministry of Employment. To determine factors associated with LSL, multivariate models were ultilised.

Results: A total of 248 patients were included. The median sick leave time for the entire population was 53 days (interquartile range (IQR) 37.0-126.5), global sum of 30 169 days; the median optimal sick leave time was 21.9 days (IQR 19.7-25.9) (p<0.05). The third tertile cut-off point for LSL was 83 days and multivariate analysis showed a significant association with dyspnoea (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.59-6.70, p=0.0001), while physical exercise of at least 10 min·day-1 was significantly associated with shorter sick leave durations (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.98, p=0.04).

Discussion: COVID-19 sick leave was considerably longer than that stipulated for nonsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral pneumonia. Long-COVID syndrome, especially dyspnoea, seems to be a very present factor in these patients' inability to work.

长COVID-19和长病假:经济活动患者的纵向研究。
病假是2019冠状病毒病大流行的众多后果之一。考虑到个人职业状况的相关性,本研究的目的是评估活动性感染后持续症状的影响,并确定与较长病假(LSLs)相关的因素。方法:本观察性研究的重点是因活动性感染后症状持续或影像学改变而在covid - 19后门诊就诊的经济活动患者。最低休假日的时间分界点以总休假天数的三分位数定义。休假时间中位数与当地就业部估计的任何其他病毒性肺炎的最佳病假时间进行了比较。为了确定与LSL相关的因素,我们使用了多变量模型。结果:共纳入248例患者。全体人口病假时间的中位数为53天(四分位数间距(IQR) 37.0-126.5),全球总和为30 169天;最佳病假时间中位数为21.9天(IQR为19.7-25.9)(p-1与较短的病假时间显著相关(OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.98, p=0.04)。讨论:新冠肺炎病假期明显长于非严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型病毒性肺炎病假期。长冠状病毒综合征,尤其是呼吸困难,似乎是这些患者无法工作的一个非常重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信