Yuan Zhang , Hu Wang , David Butler , Brandon Smart , Yutong Xie , Minh-Son To , Steven Knox , George Condous , Mathew Leonardi , Jodie C. Avery , M. Louise Hull , Gustavo Carneiro
{"title":"Unpaired multi-modal training and single-modal testing for detecting signs of endometriosis","authors":"Yuan Zhang , Hu Wang , David Butler , Brandon Smart , Yutong Xie , Minh-Son To , Steven Knox , George Condous , Mathew Leonardi , Jodie C. Avery , M. Louise Hull , Gustavo Carneiro","doi":"10.1016/j.compmedimag.2025.102575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Endometriosis is a serious multifocal condition that can involve various pelvic structures, with Pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration being a significant clinical indicator for diagnosis. To circumvent the need for invasive diagnostic procedures like laparoscopy, research has increasingly focused on imaging-based methods such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The limited diagnostic accuracy achieved through manual interpretation of these imaging techniques has driven the development of automated classifiers that can effectively utilize both modalities. However, patients often undergo only one of these two examinations, resulting in unpaired data for training and testing POD obliteration classifiers, where TVUS models tend to be more accurate than MRI models, but TVUS scanning are more operator dependent. This prompts a crucial question: Can a model be trained with unpaired TVUS and MRI data to enhance the performance of a model exclusively trained with MRI, while maintaining the high accuracy of the model individually trained with TVUS? In this paper we aim to answer this question by proposing a novel multi-modal POD obliteration classifier that is trained with unpaired TVUS and MRI data and tested using either MRI or TVUS data. Our method is the first POD obliteration classifier that can flexibly take either the TVUS or MRI data, where the model automatically focuses on the uterus region within MRI data, eliminating the need for any manual intervention. Experiments conducted on our endometriosis dataset show that our method significantly improves POD obliteration classification accuracy using MRI from AUC=0.4755 (single-modal training and testing, without automatically focusing on the uterus region) to 0.8023 (unpaired multi-modal training and single modality MRI testing, with automatic uterus region detection), while maintaining the accuracy using TVUS with AUC=0.8921 (single modality TVUS testing using either an unpaired multi-modal training or a single-modality training).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50631,"journal":{"name":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102575"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895611125000849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endometriosis is a serious multifocal condition that can involve various pelvic structures, with Pouch of Douglas (POD) obliteration being a significant clinical indicator for diagnosis. To circumvent the need for invasive diagnostic procedures like laparoscopy, research has increasingly focused on imaging-based methods such as transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The limited diagnostic accuracy achieved through manual interpretation of these imaging techniques has driven the development of automated classifiers that can effectively utilize both modalities. However, patients often undergo only one of these two examinations, resulting in unpaired data for training and testing POD obliteration classifiers, where TVUS models tend to be more accurate than MRI models, but TVUS scanning are more operator dependent. This prompts a crucial question: Can a model be trained with unpaired TVUS and MRI data to enhance the performance of a model exclusively trained with MRI, while maintaining the high accuracy of the model individually trained with TVUS? In this paper we aim to answer this question by proposing a novel multi-modal POD obliteration classifier that is trained with unpaired TVUS and MRI data and tested using either MRI or TVUS data. Our method is the first POD obliteration classifier that can flexibly take either the TVUS or MRI data, where the model automatically focuses on the uterus region within MRI data, eliminating the need for any manual intervention. Experiments conducted on our endometriosis dataset show that our method significantly improves POD obliteration classification accuracy using MRI from AUC=0.4755 (single-modal training and testing, without automatically focusing on the uterus region) to 0.8023 (unpaired multi-modal training and single modality MRI testing, with automatic uterus region detection), while maintaining the accuracy using TVUS with AUC=0.8921 (single modality TVUS testing using either an unpaired multi-modal training or a single-modality training).
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics is to act as a source for the exchange of research results concerning algorithmic advances, development, and application of digital imaging in disease detection, diagnosis, intervention, prevention, precision medicine, and population health. Included in the journal will be articles on novel computerized imaging or visualization techniques, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, augmented reality for surgical planning and guidance, big biomedical data visualization, computer-aided diagnosis, computerized-robotic surgery, image-guided therapy, imaging scanning and reconstruction, mobile and tele-imaging, radiomics, and imaging integration and modeling with other information relevant to digital health. The types of biomedical imaging include: magnetic resonance, computed tomography, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, X-ray, microwave, optical and multi-photon microscopy, video and sensory imaging, and the convergence of biomedical images with other non-imaging datasets.