Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Initial Anticoagulation Among Hospitalized Patients With Low- and Low-Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Grace M. Ferri MD , Om A. Kothari MD , Sarika D. Gurnani MD , Anica C. Law MD, MS , Nicholas A. Bosch MD, MSc , Burton H. Shen MD
{"title":"Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Initial Anticoagulation Among Hospitalized Patients With Low- and Low-Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism","authors":"Grace M. Ferri MD ,&nbsp;Om A. Kothari MD ,&nbsp;Sarika D. Gurnani MD ,&nbsp;Anica C. Law MD, MS ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Bosch MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Burton H. Shen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Guidelines recommend treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) among ambulatory patients, including patients in the emergency department, with pulmonary embolism (PE) at low risk for mortality; however, recent evidence suggests that patients with low-risk PE are usually admitted to the hospital from the emergency department rather than discharged on DOACs.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>Among hospitalized patients with low- and low-intermediate-risk PE, how do patterns in anticoagulation and outcomes vary between institutions?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>This multicenter retrospective cohort study used the PINC AI enhanced administrative database (2016-2022). Eligible adult patients were admitted to a general ward, had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, diagnosis code for PE present on admission, were initiated on anticoagulation (UFH, LMWH/fondaparinux, or a DOAC) on but not before day 1, and had troponin and brain natriuretic peptide below the upper limit of normal. Initial anticoagulation practices were summarized overall and by hospital. Regression modeling was used to determine associations between initial anticoagulation and median length of stay.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2,369 eligible patients, the percentage of patients initiated on UFH was 54%, initiated on LMWH/fondaparinux was 41%, and initiated on DOACs was 4%. Anticoagulation with DOACs decreased median length of stay by 0.62 days (95% CI, −1.04 to −0.20) compared with those who initially received UFH.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our results showed that hospitalized patients with low- and low-intermediate-risk PE generally do not receive initial DOACs. However, use of initial DOAC therapy was associated with shorter hospital length of stay compared with other initial anticoagulation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789225000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Guidelines recommend treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) among ambulatory patients, including patients in the emergency department, with pulmonary embolism (PE) at low risk for mortality; however, recent evidence suggests that patients with low-risk PE are usually admitted to the hospital from the emergency department rather than discharged on DOACs.

Research Question

Among hospitalized patients with low- and low-intermediate-risk PE, how do patterns in anticoagulation and outcomes vary between institutions?

Study Design and Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study used the PINC AI enhanced administrative database (2016-2022). Eligible adult patients were admitted to a general ward, had an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, diagnosis code for PE present on admission, were initiated on anticoagulation (UFH, LMWH/fondaparinux, or a DOAC) on but not before day 1, and had troponin and brain natriuretic peptide below the upper limit of normal. Initial anticoagulation practices were summarized overall and by hospital. Regression modeling was used to determine associations between initial anticoagulation and median length of stay.

Results

Among 2,369 eligible patients, the percentage of patients initiated on UFH was 54%, initiated on LMWH/fondaparinux was 41%, and initiated on DOACs was 4%. Anticoagulation with DOACs decreased median length of stay by 0.62 days (95% CI, −1.04 to −0.20) compared with those who initially received UFH.

Interpretation

Our results showed that hospitalized patients with low- and low-intermediate-risk PE generally do not receive initial DOACs. However, use of initial DOAC therapy was associated with shorter hospital length of stay compared with other initial anticoagulation strategies.
低危和中低危肺栓塞住院患者初始抗凝治疗的实践模式和结果
背景:指南推荐在死亡率低的肺栓塞(PE)患者中,包括急诊科患者,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)而不是未分级肝素(UFH)或低分子量肝素(LMWH)治疗;然而,最近的证据表明,低风险PE患者通常从急诊科入院,而不是在DOACs出院。在低风险和中低风险PE住院患者中,不同机构的抗凝模式和结果有何不同?研究设计与方法本多中心回顾性队列研究使用PINC AI增强型管理数据库(2016-2022)。符合条件的成年患者入住普通病房,入院时有国际疾病分类第10版PE诊断代码,在但不早于第1天开始抗凝治疗(UFH,低分子肝素/氟达肝素或DOAC),肌钙蛋白和脑钠肽低于正常上限。对初步抗凝措施进行了总体和各医院的总结。回归模型用于确定初始抗凝治疗与中位住院时间之间的关系。结果在2369例符合条件的患者中,开始使用UFH的比例为54%,开始使用低分子肝素/fondaparinux的比例为41%,开始使用DOACs的比例为4%。与最初接受UFH治疗的患者相比,DOACs抗凝治疗使患者的中位住院时间缩短了0.62天(95% CI, - 1.04至- 0.20)。我们的研究结果显示,低风险和中低风险PE住院患者通常不接受初始doac治疗。然而,与其他初始抗凝策略相比,使用初始DOAC治疗可缩短住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信