Triadic concept analysis for insights extraction from longitudinal studies in health

João Pedro Santos, Atílio Ferreira Silva, Henrique Fernandes Viana Mendes, Mark Alan Junho Song, Luis Enrique Zárate
{"title":"Triadic concept analysis for insights extraction from longitudinal studies in health","authors":"João Pedro Santos,&nbsp;Atílio Ferreira Silva,&nbsp;Henrique Fernandes Viana Mendes,&nbsp;Mark Alan Junho Song,&nbsp;Luis Enrique Zárate","doi":"10.1016/j.dsm.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the health field, longitudinal studies involve the recording of clinical observations of the same sample of patients over successive periods, referred to as waves. This type of database serves as a valuable source of information and insights, particularly when examining the temporal aspect, allowing the extraction of relevant and non-obvious knowledge. The triadic concept analysis theory has been proposed to describe the ternary relationships between objects, attributes, and conditions. In this study, we present a methodology for exploring longitudinal health databases using both the triadic theory and triadic rules, which are similar to association rules but incorporate temporal relations. Through four case studies, we demonstrate the potential of applying triadic analysis to longitudinal databases to identify risk patterns, enhance decision-making processes, and deepen our understanding of temporal dynamics. These findings suggest a promising approach for describing longitudinal databases and obtaining insights to improve clinical decision-support systems for disease treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100353,"journal":{"name":"Data Science and Management","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 160-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Science and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666764924000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the health field, longitudinal studies involve the recording of clinical observations of the same sample of patients over successive periods, referred to as waves. This type of database serves as a valuable source of information and insights, particularly when examining the temporal aspect, allowing the extraction of relevant and non-obvious knowledge. The triadic concept analysis theory has been proposed to describe the ternary relationships between objects, attributes, and conditions. In this study, we present a methodology for exploring longitudinal health databases using both the triadic theory and triadic rules, which are similar to association rules but incorporate temporal relations. Through four case studies, we demonstrate the potential of applying triadic analysis to longitudinal databases to identify risk patterns, enhance decision-making processes, and deepen our understanding of temporal dynamics. These findings suggest a promising approach for describing longitudinal databases and obtaining insights to improve clinical decision-support systems for disease treatment.
从健康纵向研究中提取见解的三合一概念分析
在卫生领域,纵向研究涉及记录同一患者样本在连续时期(称为波)内的临床观察结果。这种类型的数据库是有价值的信息和见解来源,特别是在检查时间方面时,允许提取相关和非明显的知识。三元概念分析理论被用来描述对象、属性和条件之间的三元关系。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种利用三合一理论和三合一规则来探索纵向健康数据库的方法,三合一规则类似于关联规则,但包含了时间关系。通过四个案例研究,我们展示了将三合一分析应用于纵向数据库的潜力,以识别风险模式,增强决策过程,并加深我们对时间动态的理解。这些发现为描述纵向数据库和获得见解以改进疾病治疗的临床决策支持系统提供了有希望的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信