Seismic capacity assessment of Shikhara style temple with and without traditional seismic enhancement

Suraj Malla , Mukil Alagirisamy , Purushotam Dangol
{"title":"Seismic capacity assessment of Shikhara style temple with and without traditional seismic enhancement","authors":"Suraj Malla ,&nbsp;Mukil Alagirisamy ,&nbsp;Purushotam Dangol","doi":"10.1016/j.nhres.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Brick masonry heritage structures have long been understood as highly vulnerable under earthquake excitation. Due to preservation constraints and considerations, modern materials are not allowed in seismic strengthening or post-earthquake reconstruction of heritage structures. Thus, traditional strengthening techniques are mandatory in heritage structures. The present paper reports the outcome of reconstruction initiative in a Shikhara style temple located in a world heritage site using timber element based seismic enhancement. Using numerical modeling, capacity assessment with and without timber elements is performed. For capacity assessment pushover analysis is performed for both as built and reconstructed models. The results show considerable increase in seismic capacity even with traditional improvement techniques, i.e. vertical timber elements. 18.05% increase in seismic capacity is found when vertical timber elements are used. Also, about 8% increase in the fundamental vibration frequency is observed after strengthening. The paper reports the details of geometrical features, reconstruction aspects, and numerical analysis results comprising modal analysis and capacity assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100943,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Research","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 299-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592124000891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brick masonry heritage structures have long been understood as highly vulnerable under earthquake excitation. Due to preservation constraints and considerations, modern materials are not allowed in seismic strengthening or post-earthquake reconstruction of heritage structures. Thus, traditional strengthening techniques are mandatory in heritage structures. The present paper reports the outcome of reconstruction initiative in a Shikhara style temple located in a world heritage site using timber element based seismic enhancement. Using numerical modeling, capacity assessment with and without timber elements is performed. For capacity assessment pushover analysis is performed for both as built and reconstructed models. The results show considerable increase in seismic capacity even with traditional improvement techniques, i.e. vertical timber elements. 18.05% increase in seismic capacity is found when vertical timber elements are used. Also, about 8% increase in the fundamental vibration frequency is observed after strengthening. The paper reports the details of geometrical features, reconstruction aspects, and numerical analysis results comprising modal analysis and capacity assessment.
采用和不采用传统抗震加固的释宫式寺庙抗震能力评价
长期以来,人们一直认为砖砌体遗产结构在地震作用下非常脆弱。由于保护的限制和考虑,不允许使用现代材料对遗产结构进行地震加固或震后重建。因此,传统的加固技术在遗产建筑中是强制性的。本文报道了采用基于木构元的地震增强技术对世界遗产地石窟式寺庙进行重建的结果。采用数值模拟的方法,对有无木材构件的承载力进行了评估。对于能力评估,将对已建模型和重建模型进行推覆分析。结果表明,即使采用传统的改进技术,即垂直木材构件,其抗震能力也有相当大的提高。当使用垂直木构件时,发现抗震能力提高了18.05%。强化后,基振频率提高了8%左右。本文详细介绍了结构的几何特征、重建方面以及模态分析和能力评估的数值分析结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信