Social contributions as risk factors for readmissions after lung transplantation: Clinical and financial implications

Catherine Lu Dugan BA , Margaret V. Kudlinski BS , Sivagini Ganesh MD , Graeme Rosenberg MD , Takashi Harano MD , Sean Wightman MD , Scott Atay MD , Anthony W. Kim MD , Brooks V. Udelsman MD, MHS
{"title":"Social contributions as risk factors for readmissions after lung transplantation: Clinical and financial implications","authors":"Catherine Lu Dugan BA ,&nbsp;Margaret V. Kudlinski BS ,&nbsp;Sivagini Ganesh MD ,&nbsp;Graeme Rosenberg MD ,&nbsp;Takashi Harano MD ,&nbsp;Sean Wightman MD ,&nbsp;Scott Atay MD ,&nbsp;Anthony W. Kim MD ,&nbsp;Brooks V. Udelsman MD, MHS","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Lung transplant is associated with a 60%–80% 1-year post-transplant readmission rate. Social contributors represent potentially modifiable risk factors for readmission. We compared the clinical and financial of implications of readmissions associated with and without social factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective single-center study of lung transplant patients surviving to discharge between 2/2/2013 and 4/11/2023. Two reviewers categorized 1-year readmissions into two groups: social (eg, housing instability or rejection due to medication non-compliance) and non-social (eg, pancreatitis). Sociodemographics, transplant indications, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores, lung allocation score, pre-operative hospitalization status, in-hospital post-operative course, and readmission costs were compared between patients with and without a social readmission.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 192 transplants (109 double, 83 single), there were 436 1-year readmissions, including 33 social readmissions. Reviewer inter-rater reliability was &gt;95% and Kappa was 0.91. A social readmission occurred in 21 (11%) patients, and 9 of these patients had multiple social readmissions. A social readmission was either the first or second readmission for 81% of these patients. Patients with a social readmission had a greater median number of readmissions (4 vs 2; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and were associated with longer length of stay (8 vs 5 days; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.004), increased hospital costs ($23,813 vs $14,245; <em>p</em> = 0.04), and decreased margin (-$6145 vs $2287; <em>p</em>&lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Social readmissions represent a burden on patients and health systems. There is a strong association between social readmissions and increased costs, length of stay, and number of readmissions. Outpatient investment in patients with first-time social readmissions may improve outcomes and decrease healthcare costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425000953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Lung transplant is associated with a 60%–80% 1-year post-transplant readmission rate. Social contributors represent potentially modifiable risk factors for readmission. We compared the clinical and financial of implications of readmissions associated with and without social factors.

Methods

Retrospective single-center study of lung transplant patients surviving to discharge between 2/2/2013 and 4/11/2023. Two reviewers categorized 1-year readmissions into two groups: social (eg, housing instability or rejection due to medication non-compliance) and non-social (eg, pancreatitis). Sociodemographics, transplant indications, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores, lung allocation score, pre-operative hospitalization status, in-hospital post-operative course, and readmission costs were compared between patients with and without a social readmission.

Results

Among 192 transplants (109 double, 83 single), there were 436 1-year readmissions, including 33 social readmissions. Reviewer inter-rater reliability was >95% and Kappa was 0.91. A social readmission occurred in 21 (11%) patients, and 9 of these patients had multiple social readmissions. A social readmission was either the first or second readmission for 81% of these patients. Patients with a social readmission had a greater median number of readmissions (4 vs 2; p < 0.001) and were associated with longer length of stay (8 vs 5 days; p < 0.004), increased hospital costs ($23,813 vs $14,245; p = 0.04), and decreased margin (-$6145 vs $2287; p<0.001).

Conclusions

Social readmissions represent a burden on patients and health systems. There is a strong association between social readmissions and increased costs, length of stay, and number of readmissions. Outpatient investment in patients with first-time social readmissions may improve outcomes and decrease healthcare costs.
社会贡献作为肺移植后再入院的危险因素:临床和经济意义
肺移植与移植后1年再入院率60%-80%相关。社会因素代表了可能改变的再入院风险因素。我们比较了与社会因素相关和不相关的再入院的临床和财务影响。方法对2013年2月2日至2023年11月4日期间存活至出院的肺移植患者进行回顾性单中心研究。两位审稿人将1年的再入院分为两组:社会性(例如,住房不稳定或因药物不依从性而排斥)和非社会性(例如,胰腺炎)。社会人口统计学、移植适应症、斯坦福移植综合心理社会评估评分、肺分配评分、术前住院状况、住院术后病程和再入院费用在有和没有社会再入院患者之间进行比较。结果192例移植(双例109例,单例83例)中,1年再入院436例,其中社会再入院33例。评价者间信度为95%,Kappa为0.91。21例(11%)患者发生社会再入院,其中9例有多次社会再入院。81%的患者第一次或第二次再入院是社会再入院。社会再入院的患者再入院的中位数更高(4 vs 2;p & lt;0.001),并与更长的住院时间相关(8天vs 5天;p & lt;0.004),医院费用增加(23 813美元对14 245美元;P = 0.04),利润率下降(- 6145美元vs 2287美元;术中,0.001)。结论社会再入院是患者和卫生系统的负担。社会重新接纳与增加的费用、停留时间和重新接纳的人数之间有很强的联系。首次社会再入院患者的门诊投资可改善预后并降低医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信