{"title":"Advancing eHMI for powered wheelchairs beyond safety and communication: a pilot study on enriching social interaction through a co-design approach","authors":"Mohsen Rasoulivalajoozi , Morteza Farhoudi","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.05.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Enhancing safety and communication while minimizing unwanted attention is key for wheelchair external Human-Machine Interfaces (eHMIs). This study aims to introduce an interface to enhance eHMIs for powered wheelchairs, improve external communication, and enhance positive social interactions in challenging urban situations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A co-design approach was adopted, centering wheelchair users (WUs) in a two-step methodology. First, data were collected through a qualitative survey to define criteria, which informed themes for focus group discussions. These themes guided the ideation process. Eighteen participants, including WUs and experts in cognitive psychology, physiotherapy, and design, were involved. Concepts developed in ideation sessions were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. A prototype was then developed to be assessed by both WUs and pedestrians through a structured questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>According to the analysis, four themes were identified: I. <em>Streamlined Information in Interaction</em>, II. <em>User-Centric Safety Feedback</em>, III. <em>Harmonious and Minimalist Interaction Design</em>, and IV. <em>Effortless Integration and Production</em>. Regarding these themes, a table with design suggestions and implications was introduced. Ultimately, five interface concepts were proposed, with Concept 2, ‘WheelSafe Illumina’ (41.3%), and Concept 1, ‘WheelGlow Assist’ (28.1%) emerging as top priorities, both featuring a shell structure. Concept 2 was developed for prototyping. The feedback from the experiences of both WUs and pedestrians indicate that the proposed eHMI may enhance perceived communication and safety without drawing negative attention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Integrating eHMI into a shell structure improves functional communication while also minimizing unwanted attention toward WUs—an often-overlooked issue in previous research that our co-design approach identified and effectively addressed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 200-215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825002001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Enhancing safety and communication while minimizing unwanted attention is key for wheelchair external Human-Machine Interfaces (eHMIs). This study aims to introduce an interface to enhance eHMIs for powered wheelchairs, improve external communication, and enhance positive social interactions in challenging urban situations.
Methods
A co-design approach was adopted, centering wheelchair users (WUs) in a two-step methodology. First, data were collected through a qualitative survey to define criteria, which informed themes for focus group discussions. These themes guided the ideation process. Eighteen participants, including WUs and experts in cognitive psychology, physiotherapy, and design, were involved. Concepts developed in ideation sessions were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. A prototype was then developed to be assessed by both WUs and pedestrians through a structured questionnaire.
Results
According to the analysis, four themes were identified: I. Streamlined Information in Interaction, II. User-Centric Safety Feedback, III. Harmonious and Minimalist Interaction Design, and IV. Effortless Integration and Production. Regarding these themes, a table with design suggestions and implications was introduced. Ultimately, five interface concepts were proposed, with Concept 2, ‘WheelSafe Illumina’ (41.3%), and Concept 1, ‘WheelGlow Assist’ (28.1%) emerging as top priorities, both featuring a shell structure. Concept 2 was developed for prototyping. The feedback from the experiences of both WUs and pedestrians indicate that the proposed eHMI may enhance perceived communication and safety without drawing negative attention.
Conclusion
Integrating eHMI into a shell structure improves functional communication while also minimizing unwanted attention toward WUs—an often-overlooked issue in previous research that our co-design approach identified and effectively addressed.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.