Risk of Thrombocytopenia by SSRIs or SNRIs in Patients With Depression Based on MID-NET: A Cohort Study in Japan

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yusuke Okada, Kazuhiro Kajiyama, Maki Komamine, Takashi Ando, Tomoaki Hasegawa, Chieko Ishiguro, Takahiro Nonaka, Mariko Tsukuda, Yukari Iwasaki, Takahiro Ueda, Naoya Horiuchi, Toyotaka Iguchi, Yoshiaki Uyama
{"title":"Risk of Thrombocytopenia by SSRIs or SNRIs in Patients With Depression Based on MID-NET: A Cohort Study in Japan","authors":"Yusuke Okada,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Kajiyama,&nbsp;Maki Komamine,&nbsp;Takashi Ando,&nbsp;Tomoaki Hasegawa,&nbsp;Chieko Ishiguro,&nbsp;Takahiro Nonaka,&nbsp;Mariko Tsukuda,&nbsp;Yukari Iwasaki,&nbsp;Takahiro Ueda,&nbsp;Naoya Horiuchi,&nbsp;Toyotaka Iguchi,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Uyama","doi":"10.1111/cts.70268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Risk assessment on thrombocytopenia by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) is limited. An observational study with cohort design was conducted based on the MID-NET for evaluating the risk of thrombocytopenia by SSRIs and SNRIs in patients with depression compared to paroxetine. The exposure group was categorized as each drug of SSRIs/SNRIs, SSRIs group (escitalopram, sertraline, fluvoxamine), SNRIs group (duloxetine, venlafaxine, milnacipran), or vortioxetine. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of each drug compared to paroxetine for the risk of thrombocytopenia (platelet count &lt; 100,000/mm<sup>3</sup>). More severe definitions were used in sensitivity analyses. In all, 4759 patients (median age: 49 years; 31.6% male) on SSRIs, 3440 patients (62 years; 38.6% male) on SNRIs, 12 patients (42.5 years; less than 83.4% male) on vortioxetine, and 2196 patients on paroxetine (62 years; 33.2% male) were included for analysis. Compared with paroxetine, the aHRs (95% confidence interval) of SSRIs group and SNRIs group were 1.14 (0.76–1.70) and 0.77 (0.48–1.21), respectively. Among SSRIs, sertraline and fluvoxamine showed a relatively higher point estimate of aHR &gt; 1.0 (1.23 [95% confidence interval: 0.78–1.94] and 1.48 [0.87–2.51], respectively). The consistent results were also observed in the sensitivity analyses. The results suggest that the risk of thrombocytopenia by sertraline or fluvoxamine was comparable to that by paroxetine, known as having the risk of thrombocytopenia, leading to the revision of the sertraline package insert as a regulatory safety measure. Prescribers and clinicians may need to be vigilant to the possibility of sertraline-induced thrombocytopenia in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70268","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk assessment on thrombocytopenia by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) is limited. An observational study with cohort design was conducted based on the MID-NET for evaluating the risk of thrombocytopenia by SSRIs and SNRIs in patients with depression compared to paroxetine. The exposure group was categorized as each drug of SSRIs/SNRIs, SSRIs group (escitalopram, sertraline, fluvoxamine), SNRIs group (duloxetine, venlafaxine, milnacipran), or vortioxetine. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of each drug compared to paroxetine for the risk of thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100,000/mm3). More severe definitions were used in sensitivity analyses. In all, 4759 patients (median age: 49 years; 31.6% male) on SSRIs, 3440 patients (62 years; 38.6% male) on SNRIs, 12 patients (42.5 years; less than 83.4% male) on vortioxetine, and 2196 patients on paroxetine (62 years; 33.2% male) were included for analysis. Compared with paroxetine, the aHRs (95% confidence interval) of SSRIs group and SNRIs group were 1.14 (0.76–1.70) and 0.77 (0.48–1.21), respectively. Among SSRIs, sertraline and fluvoxamine showed a relatively higher point estimate of aHR > 1.0 (1.23 [95% confidence interval: 0.78–1.94] and 1.48 [0.87–2.51], respectively). The consistent results were also observed in the sensitivity analyses. The results suggest that the risk of thrombocytopenia by sertraline or fluvoxamine was comparable to that by paroxetine, known as having the risk of thrombocytopenia, leading to the revision of the sertraline package insert as a regulatory safety measure. Prescribers and clinicians may need to be vigilant to the possibility of sertraline-induced thrombocytopenia in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

基于MID-NET的抑郁症患者服用SSRIs或SNRIs的血小板减少风险:日本的一项队列研究
选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)或血清素去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)对血小板减少症的风险评估是有限的。基于MID-NET进行了一项队列设计的观察性研究,以评估抑郁症患者使用SSRIs和SNRIs与使用帕罗西汀相比发生血小板减少的风险。暴露组分为SSRIs/SNRIs、SSRIs组(艾司西酞普兰、舍曲林、氟伏沙明)、SNRIs组(度洛西汀、文拉法辛、米那西普兰)、vortioxetine。我们估计了与帕罗西汀相比,每种药物的血小板减少风险的调整危险比(aHR)(血小板计数<; 100,000/mm3)。在敏感性分析中使用了更严格的定义。共有4759例患者(中位年龄:49岁;31.6%男性),3440例患者(62岁;38.6%男性),12例(42.5岁;少于83.4%的男性)使用沃替西汀,2196例患者使用帕罗西汀(62岁;33.2%男性)纳入分析。与帕罗西汀相比,SSRIs组和SNRIs组ahr(95%可信区间)分别为1.14(0.76-1.70)和0.77(0.48-1.21)。在SSRIs中,舍曲林和氟伏沙明的aHR >; 1.0的点估值相对较高(分别为1.23[95%可信区间:0.78-1.94]和1.48[0.87-2.51])。在敏感性分析中也观察到一致的结果。结果表明,舍曲林或氟伏沙明的血小板减少风险与帕罗西汀相当,被称为具有血小板减少风险,导致修改舍曲林包装说明书作为监管安全措施。在临床实践中,开处方者和临床医生可能需要警惕舍曲林引起的血小板减少症的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信