Chang Guo, Wu-cai Yang, Jie Zhou, Jian-Jun Wang, Dong Ji
{"title":"Ultra-Processed Food Intake and Risk of Adverse Liver Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Chang Guo, Wu-cai Yang, Jie Zhou, Jian-Jun Wang, Dong Ji","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and adverse liver outcomes, addressing a critical evidence gap as prior observational studies lacked pooled quantitative synthesis. Researchers conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science (up to October 17, 2024) using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords. Statistical analyses in Stata 14.0 employed fixed-effects (<i>P</i> > 0.1, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%) or random-effects models (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> > 50%), with publication bias assessed via funnel plots and Egger's test. The analysis included 17 studies (11 cohort, 3 case-control, 3 cross-sectional; <i>n</i> = 1,092,950 participants). UPF consumption significantly increased risks of adverse liver outcomes (OR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.34–1.86; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 89.9%), specifically non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR = 1.72; 95%CI: 1.36–2.17), liver fibrosis (OR = 1.31; 95%CI: 1.08–1.59), and liver cancer (OR = 1.35; 95%CI: 1.03–1.76). Subgroup analyses revealed regional variations, with Asian cohorts showing lower NAFLD risk (OR = 1.47 vs. American/European studies). High heterogeneity (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 89.9%) persisted across analyses. Findings confirm UPFs as independent risk factors for liver diseases, mediated through metabolic pathways like fat accumulation and inflammation. This synthesis strengthens evidence for dietary guidelines limiting UPFs to mitigate global liver disease burdens. The study's robust methodology and large sample size underscore the clinical and public health implications of reducing UPF consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70303","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and adverse liver outcomes, addressing a critical evidence gap as prior observational studies lacked pooled quantitative synthesis. Researchers conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science (up to October 17, 2024) using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords. Statistical analyses in Stata 14.0 employed fixed-effects (P > 0.1, I2 ≤ 50%) or random-effects models (I2 > 50%), with publication bias assessed via funnel plots and Egger's test. The analysis included 17 studies (11 cohort, 3 case-control, 3 cross-sectional; n = 1,092,950 participants). UPF consumption significantly increased risks of adverse liver outcomes (OR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.34–1.86; I2 = 89.9%), specifically non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (OR = 1.72; 95%CI: 1.36–2.17), liver fibrosis (OR = 1.31; 95%CI: 1.08–1.59), and liver cancer (OR = 1.35; 95%CI: 1.03–1.76). Subgroup analyses revealed regional variations, with Asian cohorts showing lower NAFLD risk (OR = 1.47 vs. American/European studies). High heterogeneity (I2 = 89.9%) persisted across analyses. Findings confirm UPFs as independent risk factors for liver diseases, mediated through metabolic pathways like fat accumulation and inflammation. This synthesis strengthens evidence for dietary guidelines limiting UPFs to mitigate global liver disease burdens. The study's robust methodology and large sample size underscore the clinical and public health implications of reducing UPF consumption.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.