Collective unstructured interactions drive chromatin binding of transcription factors.

Abrar A Abidi, Gina M Dailey, Robert Tjian, Thomas G W Graham
{"title":"Collective unstructured interactions drive chromatin binding of transcription factors.","authors":"Abrar A Abidi, Gina M Dailey, Robert Tjian, Thomas G W Graham","doi":"10.1101/2025.05.16.654615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) contain both structured DNA-binding domains (DBDs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). While the structures and sequence preferences of DBDs have been extensively characterized, the role of IDR-mediated interactions in chromatin binding and nuclear organization remains poorly understood, in part because these interactions have been difficult to measure in living cells. Here, we use a recently developed single-molecule technique, proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), to investigate how IDRs influence TF associations with each other and with chromatin, focusing on the factors Sp1 and Klf1. We find that the number and patterning of aromatic and basic residues within IDRs govern both TF self-association and chromatin binding. Unexpectedly, the isolated DBD of Sp1 binds chromatin very weakly and non-specifically. The isolated IDR, by contrast, interacts poorly with chromatin-bound wild-type Sp1, yet this interaction is enhanced when even minimal DNA-binding capacity is restored. Strikingly, replacing Sp1's native DBD with those of heterologous TFs recovers both IDR-mediated interactions and chromatin association, despite divergent sequence preferences. PAPA measurements also reveal extensive heterotypic interactions between wild-type Sp1 and other TFs. Together, these results establish PAPA as a powerful method for studying unstructured interactions in their native context and suggest that IDRs participate in widespread cooperative associations scaffolded by transient DBD-DNA contacts, which concentrate disordered regions along chromatin. In contrast to classical models, we propose that TF specificity <i>in vivo</i> emerges not solely from DBD sequence preferences, but from a constellation of weak, dynamic, and diverse interactions mediated by IDRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":519960,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.16.654615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) contain both structured DNA-binding domains (DBDs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). While the structures and sequence preferences of DBDs have been extensively characterized, the role of IDR-mediated interactions in chromatin binding and nuclear organization remains poorly understood, in part because these interactions have been difficult to measure in living cells. Here, we use a recently developed single-molecule technique, proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), to investigate how IDRs influence TF associations with each other and with chromatin, focusing on the factors Sp1 and Klf1. We find that the number and patterning of aromatic and basic residues within IDRs govern both TF self-association and chromatin binding. Unexpectedly, the isolated DBD of Sp1 binds chromatin very weakly and non-specifically. The isolated IDR, by contrast, interacts poorly with chromatin-bound wild-type Sp1, yet this interaction is enhanced when even minimal DNA-binding capacity is restored. Strikingly, replacing Sp1's native DBD with those of heterologous TFs recovers both IDR-mediated interactions and chromatin association, despite divergent sequence preferences. PAPA measurements also reveal extensive heterotypic interactions between wild-type Sp1 and other TFs. Together, these results establish PAPA as a powerful method for studying unstructured interactions in their native context and suggest that IDRs participate in widespread cooperative associations scaffolded by transient DBD-DNA contacts, which concentrate disordered regions along chromatin. In contrast to classical models, we propose that TF specificity in vivo emerges not solely from DBD sequence preferences, but from a constellation of weak, dynamic, and diverse interactions mediated by IDRs.

集体非结构化相互作用驱动转录因子的染色质结合。
真核转录因子(TFs)既包含结构化dna结合域(DBDs),也包含内在无序区(IDRs)。虽然dbd的结构和序列偏好已被广泛表征,但idr介导的相互作用在染色质结合和核组织中的作用仍然知之甚少,部分原因是这些相互作用难以在活细胞中测量。在这里,我们使用最近开发的单分子技术,近距离辅助光激活(PAPA),研究idr如何影响TF相互关联以及与染色质的关联,重点关注因子Sp1和Klf1。我们发现idr中芳香残基和碱性残基的数量和模式控制着TF的自结合和染色质结合。出乎意料的是,Sp1分离的DBD与染色质结合非常弱且非特异性。相比之下,分离的IDR与染色质结合的野生型Sp1相互作用较差,但即使是最小的dna结合能力恢复,这种相互作用也会增强。引人注目的是,用那些异源TFs替换Sp1的原生DBD可以恢复idr介导的相互作用和染色质关联,尽管序列偏好不同。PAPA测量还揭示了野生型Sp1和其他tf之间广泛的异型相互作用。总之,这些结果确立了PAPA是研究其原生环境下非结构化相互作用的有力方法,并表明idr参与了由瞬时DBD-DNA接触支撑的广泛的合作关联,这些接触集中了沿染色质的无序区域。与经典模型相反,我们提出体内TF特异性不仅来自于DBD序列偏好,还来自于idr介导的一系列弱的、动态的和多样化的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信