Best Practices and Checklist for Reviewing Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Imaging Papers: Classification.

Timothy L Kline, Felipe Kitamura, Daniel Warren, Ian Pan, Amine M Korchi, Neil Tenenholtz, Linda Moy, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Igor Santos, Kamyar Moradi, Atlas Haddadi Avval, Dana Alkhulaifat, Steven L Blumer, Misha Ysabel Hwang, Kim-Ann Git, Abishek Shroff, Joseph Stember, Elad Walach, George Shih, Steve G Langer
{"title":"Best Practices and Checklist for Reviewing Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Imaging Papers: Classification.","authors":"Timothy L Kline, Felipe Kitamura, Daniel Warren, Ian Pan, Amine M Korchi, Neil Tenenholtz, Linda Moy, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Igor Santos, Kamyar Moradi, Atlas Haddadi Avval, Dana Alkhulaifat, Steven L Blumer, Misha Ysabel Hwang, Kim-Ann Git, Abishek Shroff, Joseph Stember, Elad Walach, George Shih, Steve G Langer","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01548-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodologies and their application to medical imaging has led to an explosion of related research programs utilizing AI to produce state-of-the-art classification performance. Ideally, research culminates in dissemination of the findings in peer-reviewed journals. To date, acceptance or rejection criteria are often subjective; however, reproducible science requires reproducible review. The Machine Learning Education Sub-Committee of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) has identified a knowledge gap and need to establish guidelines for reviewing these studies. This present work, written from the machine learning practitioner standpoint, follows a similar approach to our previous paper related to segmentation. In this series, the committee will address best practices to follow in AI-based studies and present the required sections with examples and discussion of requirements to make the studies cohesive, reproducible, accurate, and self-contained. This entry in the series focuses on image classification. Elements like dataset curation, data pre-processing steps, reference standard identification, data partitioning, model architecture, and training are discussed. Sections are presented as in a typical manuscript. The content describes the information necessary to ensure the study is of sufficient quality for publication consideration and, compared with other checklists, provides a focused approach with application to image classification tasks. The goal of this series is to provide resources to not only help improve the review process for AI-based medical imaging papers, but to facilitate a standard for the information that should be presented within all components of the research study.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01548-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) methodologies and their application to medical imaging has led to an explosion of related research programs utilizing AI to produce state-of-the-art classification performance. Ideally, research culminates in dissemination of the findings in peer-reviewed journals. To date, acceptance or rejection criteria are often subjective; however, reproducible science requires reproducible review. The Machine Learning Education Sub-Committee of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) has identified a knowledge gap and need to establish guidelines for reviewing these studies. This present work, written from the machine learning practitioner standpoint, follows a similar approach to our previous paper related to segmentation. In this series, the committee will address best practices to follow in AI-based studies and present the required sections with examples and discussion of requirements to make the studies cohesive, reproducible, accurate, and self-contained. This entry in the series focuses on image classification. Elements like dataset curation, data pre-processing steps, reference standard identification, data partitioning, model architecture, and training are discussed. Sections are presented as in a typical manuscript. The content describes the information necessary to ensure the study is of sufficient quality for publication consideration and, compared with other checklists, provides a focused approach with application to image classification tasks. The goal of this series is to provide resources to not only help improve the review process for AI-based medical imaging papers, but to facilitate a standard for the information that should be presented within all components of the research study.

基于人工智能的医学影像学论文评审的最佳实践和清单:分类。
人工智能(AI)方法的最新进展及其在医学成像中的应用导致了利用人工智能产生最先进分类性能的相关研究项目的爆炸式增长。理想的情况是,研究结果在同行评议的期刊上传播。迄今为止,接受或拒绝的标准往往是主观的;然而,可重复的科学需要可重复的评论。医学成像信息学学会(SIIM)的机器学习教育小组委员会已经确定了知识差距,需要建立审查这些研究的指导方针。本文从机器学习从业者的角度出发,采用了与我们之前关于分割的论文类似的方法。在本系列中,委员会将讨论在基于人工智能的研究中应遵循的最佳实践,并提供必要的部分,包括示例和需求讨论,以使研究具有凝聚力、可复制性、准确性和自成一体。本系列文章的重点是图像分类。讨论了数据集管理、数据预处理步骤、参考标准识别、数据划分、模型架构和训练等元素。章节呈现为典型的手稿。内容描述了必要的信息,以确保研究是足够的质量出版考虑,与其他检查表相比,提供了一个集中的方法,应用于图像分类任务。本系列的目标是提供资源,不仅帮助改进基于人工智能的医学成像论文的审查过程,而且促进在研究的所有组成部分中应该呈现的信息的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信