Effects of Screening Hemoglobin A1C on Complications in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Anthony E Capito, Nikitha Potturi, Christina N Canzoneri, Matthew A Applebaum, Stephanie Hamlin, Joowon Choi, Alicia J Lozano, Wenyan Ji, Kurtis E Moyer
{"title":"Effects of Screening Hemoglobin A1C on Complications in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Anthony E Capito, Nikitha Potturi, Christina N Canzoneri, Matthew A Applebaum, Stephanie Hamlin, Joowon Choi, Alicia J Lozano, Wenyan Ji, Kurtis E Moyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many institutions have implemented universal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) screening for all preoperative patients in an effort to reduce rates of surgical complications. However, the usefulness of HbA1c screening for predicting complications after implant-based breast reconstruction has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of HbA1c screening on postoperative complications following implant-based breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction at a single institution was conducted. All patients required an HbA1c screening preoperatively. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: normal HbA1c (<5.7%) or abnormal HbA1c (≥5.7%). The 2 groups were propensity score matched for baseline characteristics and compared for complication rates after the first- and second-stage procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 203 patients who underwent first-stage breast reconstruction were divided into normal HbA1c (n = 135) and abnormal HbA1c (n = 68) cohorts. A propensity score weighted analysis demonstrated increased risk of incisional dehiscence in the abnormal group (<i>P</i> = .050). Ninety-nine patients who underwent second-stage breast reconstruction were divided into normal HbA1c (n = 55) and abnormal HbA1c (n = 44) cohorts. The abnormal HbA1c group demonstrated marginally higher rates of implant loss (<i>P</i> = .059). Otherwise, no statistically significant differences were noted in rates of surgical site infection, seroma or hematoma formation, or implant rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with abnormal HbA1c on preoperative screening demonstrated higher rates of incisional dehiscence after first-stage breast reconstruction and higher rates of implant loss following second-stage breast reconstruction. Obtaining routine preoperative HbA1c screening should be considered as an adjunct to guide discussions about surgical risk for patients undergoing breast reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":93993,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"24 ","pages":"e63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many institutions have implemented universal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) screening for all preoperative patients in an effort to reduce rates of surgical complications. However, the usefulness of HbA1c screening for predicting complications after implant-based breast reconstruction has yet to be determined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of HbA1c screening on postoperative complications following implant-based breast reconstruction.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction at a single institution was conducted. All patients required an HbA1c screening preoperatively. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: normal HbA1c (<5.7%) or abnormal HbA1c (≥5.7%). The 2 groups were propensity score matched for baseline characteristics and compared for complication rates after the first- and second-stage procedures.

Results: In this study, 203 patients who underwent first-stage breast reconstruction were divided into normal HbA1c (n = 135) and abnormal HbA1c (n = 68) cohorts. A propensity score weighted analysis demonstrated increased risk of incisional dehiscence in the abnormal group (P = .050). Ninety-nine patients who underwent second-stage breast reconstruction were divided into normal HbA1c (n = 55) and abnormal HbA1c (n = 44) cohorts. The abnormal HbA1c group demonstrated marginally higher rates of implant loss (P = .059). Otherwise, no statistically significant differences were noted in rates of surgical site infection, seroma or hematoma formation, or implant rupture.

Conclusions: Patients with abnormal HbA1c on preoperative screening demonstrated higher rates of incisional dehiscence after first-stage breast reconstruction and higher rates of implant loss following second-stage breast reconstruction. Obtaining routine preoperative HbA1c screening should be considered as an adjunct to guide discussions about surgical risk for patients undergoing breast reconstruction.

筛查糖化血红蛋白对假体乳房再造术并发症的影响。
背景:为了降低手术并发症的发生率,许多机构已经对所有术前患者实施了通用的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)筛查。然而,HbA1c筛查在预测假体乳房重建术后并发症方面的作用尚未确定。本研究的目的是探讨HbA1c筛查对假体乳房再造术术后并发症的预测价值。方法:回顾性队列研究在单一机构进行了基于假体的乳房重建的患者。所有患者术前均需进行HbA1c筛查。将患者分为正常HbA1c两组(结果:203例一期乳房重建患者分为正常HbA1c组(n = 135)和异常HbA1c组(n = 68)。倾向评分加权分析显示,异常组切口裂开的风险增加(P = 0.050)。99例接受二期乳房重建的患者被分为HbA1c正常组(n = 55)和HbA1c异常组(n = 44)。HbA1c异常组种植体丢失率略高(P = 0.059)。除此之外,在手术部位感染、血肿或血肿形成或植入物破裂的发生率方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:术前筛查HbA1c异常的患者在一期乳房再造术后切口开裂的发生率更高,二期乳房再造术后植入物丢失的发生率更高。术前常规HbA1c筛查可作为指导乳房再造患者手术风险讨论的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信