Contrasting effects of agriculture and urbanisation on bird and reptile communities in a Mediterranean delta (Gediz Delta, Türkiye).

IF 2.3 Q2 ECOLOGY
Dilara Arslan, Elie Gaget, Kerim Çiçek, Anthony Olivier, Thomas Galewski, Ömer Döndüren, Anis Guelmami, Lisa Ernoul, Arnaud Béchet
{"title":"Contrasting effects of agriculture and urbanisation on bird and reptile communities in a Mediterranean delta (Gediz Delta, Türkiye).","authors":"Dilara Arslan, Elie Gaget, Kerim Çiçek, Anthony Olivier, Thomas Galewski, Ömer Döndüren, Anis Guelmami, Lisa Ernoul, Arnaud Béchet","doi":"10.1186/s12862-025-02390-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wetlands have been some of the most destroyed ecosystems over the last century, with important land-use changes resulting from agricultural, industrial, and urban development. Gediz Delta is a large wetland on the Aegean coast of Western Türkiye with natural areas affected by conversion to agriculture and urban developments from the Izmir metropolis. We assessed the effects of landscape type (natural, agricultural, and urban) on the composition of breeding bird (90 species) and reptile (14 species) communities in the Gediz Delta between 2019 and 2021. We used generalized linear models to estimate the effect of landscape types on community indexes and joint species distribution models to assess how species-specific habitat preferences explained their responses to landscape type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results show that bird and reptile community compositions were impacted differently depending on landscape type. Landscape type significantly affected bird abundance and Shannon equality indices but had no significant effect on bird and reptile species richness. Natural landscapes accommodated higher bird abundance and lower diversity indexes than the other two landscapes. On the other hand, we found that urban and agricultural landscapes accommodated more generalist species than natural ones. Natural landscapes were preferred by Marine & Coastal and Inland wetland bird specialists and reptiles relying on Mediterranean Habitats. Overall, these results suggest that community composition encountered in different landscape types is explained by species' habitat specializations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We highlight the critical importance of natural landscapes for conserving specialist species within the Delta while showing the potential of agricultural areas for a few freshwater reptile species. These results imply that the Gediz Delta would benefit from biodiversity conservation planning to enhance the protection of natural habitats and mitigate the negative impacts of agricultural and urban development on bird and reptile populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93910,"journal":{"name":"BMC ecology and evolution","volume":"25 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC ecology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-025-02390-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wetlands have been some of the most destroyed ecosystems over the last century, with important land-use changes resulting from agricultural, industrial, and urban development. Gediz Delta is a large wetland on the Aegean coast of Western Türkiye with natural areas affected by conversion to agriculture and urban developments from the Izmir metropolis. We assessed the effects of landscape type (natural, agricultural, and urban) on the composition of breeding bird (90 species) and reptile (14 species) communities in the Gediz Delta between 2019 and 2021. We used generalized linear models to estimate the effect of landscape types on community indexes and joint species distribution models to assess how species-specific habitat preferences explained their responses to landscape type.

Results: Our results show that bird and reptile community compositions were impacted differently depending on landscape type. Landscape type significantly affected bird abundance and Shannon equality indices but had no significant effect on bird and reptile species richness. Natural landscapes accommodated higher bird abundance and lower diversity indexes than the other two landscapes. On the other hand, we found that urban and agricultural landscapes accommodated more generalist species than natural ones. Natural landscapes were preferred by Marine & Coastal and Inland wetland bird specialists and reptiles relying on Mediterranean Habitats. Overall, these results suggest that community composition encountered in different landscape types is explained by species' habitat specializations.

Conclusions: We highlight the critical importance of natural landscapes for conserving specialist species within the Delta while showing the potential of agricultural areas for a few freshwater reptile species. These results imply that the Gediz Delta would benefit from biodiversity conservation planning to enhance the protection of natural habitats and mitigate the negative impacts of agricultural and urban development on bird and reptile populations.

农业和城市化对地中海三角洲鸟类和爬行动物群落的对比影响(Gediz delta, t基耶)。
背景:由于农业、工业和城市的发展,湿地的土地利用发生了重大变化,湿地是上个世纪被破坏最严重的生态系统之一。Gediz三角洲是西部基耶岛爱琴海沿岸的一个大型湿地,自然区域受到伊兹密尔大都市向农业和城市发展转变的影响。研究了2019 - 2021年格迪斯三角洲不同景观类型(自然、农业和城市)对繁殖鸟(90种)和爬行动物(14种)群落组成的影响。我们利用广义线性模型估计景观类型对群落指数的影响,并利用联合物种分布模型评估物种特异性栖息地偏好如何解释它们对景观类型的响应。结果:不同景观类型对鸟类和爬行动物群落组成的影响不同。景观类型显著影响鸟类丰度和香农平等指数,但对鸟类和爬行动物物种丰富度影响不显著。自然景观的鸟类丰度高于自然景观,多样性指数低于自然景观。另一方面,我们发现城市和农业景观比自然景观更能容纳多面手物种。自然景观是海洋、沿海和内陆湿地鸟类专家和依赖地中海栖息地的爬行动物的首选。总体而言,这些结果表明,不同景观类型中遇到的群落组成可以用物种的栖息地专门化来解释。结论:我们强调了自然景观对保护三角洲内特殊物种的重要性,同时显示了农业地区对一些淡水爬行动物物种的潜力。这些结果表明,生物多样性保护规划将有利于加强对自然栖息地的保护,减轻农业和城市发展对鸟类和爬行动物种群的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信