Nonpharmacologic Back Pain Treatment Use and Associated Patient Reported Outcomes in US-Based Integrative Medicine Clinics.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130251345481
Eric J Roseen, Emily E Hurstak, Ryung S Kim, Qi Gao, Carol M Greco, David R Vago, Robert B Saper, Benjamin Kligler, M Diane McKee, Jeffery A Dusek
{"title":"Nonpharmacologic Back Pain Treatment Use and Associated Patient Reported Outcomes in US-Based Integrative Medicine Clinics.","authors":"Eric J Roseen, Emily E Hurstak, Ryung S Kim, Qi Gao, Carol M Greco, David R Vago, Robert B Saper, Benjamin Kligler, M Diane McKee, Jeffery A Dusek","doi":"10.1177/27536130251345481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integrative medicine (IM) clinic is an innovative care model that may increase access to guideline-concordant nonpharmacologic treatment use in healthcare delivery systems for prevalent conditions such as low back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use and effectiveness of IM services for LBP in IM clinics.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Adult patients with LBP enrolled at seventeen IM clinics.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Patterns of IM service use were assessed over 12 months. Changes in clinical outcomes were assessed between index visit and 12-month follow-up using linear mixed-effects models. Primary (pain interference, physical function) and secondary (pain intensity, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social participation) outcomes were obtained from the PROMIS-29 instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 660 participants with LBP (mean age = 51.6 years, 75% female). Over the 12-month study period, common IM services were IM consults (56%), acupuncture (44%), chiropractic care (24%), physical therapy (19%), and massage (17%). Over two-thirds (70%) of participants received at least one guideline-concordant nonpharmacologic treatment. Participants with follow-up outcome data (n = 443, 67%) reported a modest reduction in pain interference with life activities in the short- and long-term (2-month mean difference [MD] = -1.47, 95%CI = -2.98, -0.64; 12-month MD = -1.98, 95%CI = -3.12, -0.88). By contrast, improvements in physical function were not statistically or clinically significant (2-month MD = 0.37, 95%CI = -0.28, 1.01; 12-month MD = 0.69, 95%CI = -0.31, 1.69). At 12 months, small improvements were observed on all secondary outcomes (pain intensity, anxiety, depression, and social participation) except fatigue and sleep disturbance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with LBP receiving care at IM clinics received at least one guideline-recommended nonpharmacologic treatment. However, improvements on clinical outcomes were relatively small. Additional multi-site studies are needed to explore the optimal implementation approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":"14 ","pages":"27536130251345481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130251345481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integrative medicine (IM) clinic is an innovative care model that may increase access to guideline-concordant nonpharmacologic treatment use in healthcare delivery systems for prevalent conditions such as low back pain (LBP).

Objective: To describe the use and effectiveness of IM services for LBP in IM clinics.

Research design: Prospective cohort study.

Subjects: Adult patients with LBP enrolled at seventeen IM clinics.

Measures: Patterns of IM service use were assessed over 12 months. Changes in clinical outcomes were assessed between index visit and 12-month follow-up using linear mixed-effects models. Primary (pain interference, physical function) and secondary (pain intensity, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social participation) outcomes were obtained from the PROMIS-29 instrument.

Results: We identified 660 participants with LBP (mean age = 51.6 years, 75% female). Over the 12-month study period, common IM services were IM consults (56%), acupuncture (44%), chiropractic care (24%), physical therapy (19%), and massage (17%). Over two-thirds (70%) of participants received at least one guideline-concordant nonpharmacologic treatment. Participants with follow-up outcome data (n = 443, 67%) reported a modest reduction in pain interference with life activities in the short- and long-term (2-month mean difference [MD] = -1.47, 95%CI = -2.98, -0.64; 12-month MD = -1.98, 95%CI = -3.12, -0.88). By contrast, improvements in physical function were not statistically or clinically significant (2-month MD = 0.37, 95%CI = -0.28, 1.01; 12-month MD = 0.69, 95%CI = -0.31, 1.69). At 12 months, small improvements were observed on all secondary outcomes (pain intensity, anxiety, depression, and social participation) except fatigue and sleep disturbance.

Conclusions: Most patients with LBP receiving care at IM clinics received at least one guideline-recommended nonpharmacologic treatment. However, improvements on clinical outcomes were relatively small. Additional multi-site studies are needed to explore the optimal implementation approach.

美国中西医结合诊所非药物治疗背痛的使用和相关患者报告的结果。
背景:中西医结合(IM)诊所是一种创新的护理模式,可以增加在医疗保健服务系统中使用符合指南的非药物治疗,用于治疗腰痛(LBP)等常见疾病。目的:描述IM诊所对LBP的使用和有效性。研究设计:前瞻性队列研究。对象:在17家IM诊所登记的成年LBP患者。测量方法:在12个月内评估即时通讯服务的使用模式。使用线性混合效应模型评估指标访问和12个月随访期间临床结果的变化。主要(疼痛干扰、身体功能)和次要(疼痛强度、焦虑、抑郁、疲劳、睡眠障碍、社会参与)结果通过promise -29量表获得。结果:我们确定了660名LBP患者(平均年龄51.6岁,75%为女性)。在12个月的研究期间,常见的即时通讯服务包括即时通讯咨询(56%)、针灸(44%)、脊椎按摩(24%)、物理治疗(19%)和按摩(17%)。超过三分之二(70%)的参与者接受了至少一种符合指南的非药物治疗。随访结果数据的参与者(n = 443, 67%)报告疼痛对短期和长期生活活动的干扰有适度减少(2个月平均差异[MD] = -1.47, 95%CI = -2.98, -0.64;12个月MD = -1.98, 95%CI = -3.12, -0.88)。相比之下,身体功能的改善无统计学意义或临床意义(2个月MD = 0.37, 95%CI = -0.28, 1.01;12个月MD = 0.69, 95%CI = -0.31, 1.69)。12个月时,除疲劳和睡眠障碍外,所有次要结局(疼痛强度、焦虑、抑郁和社会参与)均有小幅改善。结论:大多数在IM诊所接受治疗的腰痛患者至少接受了一种指南推荐的非药物治疗。然而,临床结果的改善相对较小。需要更多的多地点研究来探索最佳的实施方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信