Comparison of the Effects of Blood Cardioplegia and Del Nido Cardioplegia on Postoperative Intensive Care Needs, Drainage, and Renal Functions in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass.

IF 1.2
Yaşar Sarıgol, Serkan Yıldırım, Mehmet Işık, Omer Tanyeli, Yuksel Dereli, Erdal Ege, Niyazi Gormuş
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Blood Cardioplegia and Del Nido Cardioplegia on Postoperative Intensive Care Needs, Drainage, and Renal Functions in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass.","authors":"Yaşar Sarıgol, Serkan Yıldırım, Mehmet Işık, Omer Tanyeli, Yuksel Dereli, Erdal Ege, Niyazi Gormuş","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A variety of cardioplegia techniques with different components are implemented to ensure myocardial protection, in addition to keeping the operationa field immobile and free of blood during cardiac surgery. The implemented cardioplegia has unwanted negative effects on other end organs. In this study, our aim was to compare the effects of Del Nido cardioplegia and blood cardioplegia solutions on postoperative intensive care duration, drainage, and renal functions for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and bypass graft operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Selections were made from patients undergoing elective bypass graft operations in our clinic from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Patients were randomly selected, retrospectively assessed, and divided into two groups - De Nido group (Group 1) and blood cardioplegia group (Group 2). Comparisons were made between these groups in terms of intensive care duration, drainage, and renal functions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 120 patients. The Del Nido cardioplegia group included 60 patients, with 60 patients in the blood cardioplegia group. Comparisons between the groups found that the aortic cross-clamping duration was significantly high in Group 1 (P = 0.014). The noradrenaline dose given to Group 1 was high (P = 0.004). In terms of renal injury, significant degree of elevation was present in Group 1 (P = 0.027). The longer aortic cross-clamping duration in Group 1 may be assessed as a determinant factor for noradrenaline dose and acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study concluded that it willbe appropriate to choose the cardioplegia method by performing broader meta-analysis studies and minimizing limiting factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"40 4","pages":"e20240237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A variety of cardioplegia techniques with different components are implemented to ensure myocardial protection, in addition to keeping the operationa field immobile and free of blood during cardiac surgery. The implemented cardioplegia has unwanted negative effects on other end organs. In this study, our aim was to compare the effects of Del Nido cardioplegia and blood cardioplegia solutions on postoperative intensive care duration, drainage, and renal functions for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass and bypass graft operations.

Methods: Selections were made from patients undergoing elective bypass graft operations in our clinic from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Patients were randomly selected, retrospectively assessed, and divided into two groups - De Nido group (Group 1) and blood cardioplegia group (Group 2). Comparisons were made between these groups in terms of intensive care duration, drainage, and renal functions.

Results: The study included 120 patients. The Del Nido cardioplegia group included 60 patients, with 60 patients in the blood cardioplegia group. Comparisons between the groups found that the aortic cross-clamping duration was significantly high in Group 1 (P = 0.014). The noradrenaline dose given to Group 1 was high (P = 0.004). In terms of renal injury, significant degree of elevation was present in Group 1 (P = 0.027). The longer aortic cross-clamping duration in Group 1 may be assessed as a determinant factor for noradrenaline dose and acute kidney injury.

Conclusion: This study concluded that it willbe appropriate to choose the cardioplegia method by performing broader meta-analysis studies and minimizing limiting factors.

血停搏与Del Nido停搏对孤立冠状动脉搭桥术后重症监护需求、引流及肾功能影响的比较
目的:在心脏手术过程中,在保持手术野不动、无血的基础上,实施多种不同成分的心脏截留技术,以保证心肌的保护。实施的心脏截瘫对其他末端器官有不良的负面影响。在这项研究中,我们的目的是比较Del Nido停搏液和血液停搏液对体外循环和旁路移植术患者术后重症监护时间、引流和肾功能的影响。方法:选取2022年1月1日至2023年12月31日在我院行择期搭桥手术的患者。随机选择患者,回顾性评估,分为两组——De Nido组(1组)和血停搏组(2组)。比较两组患者的重症监护时间、引流和肾功能。结果:纳入120例患者。Del Nido停搏组60例,血停搏组60例。组间比较发现,1组主动脉交叉夹持时间明显高于对照组(P = 0.014)。组1给予去甲肾上腺素剂量较高(P = 0.004)。在肾损伤方面,组1存在显著程度的升高(P = 0.027)。第1组主动脉交叉夹持时间较长,可作为去甲肾上腺素剂量和急性肾损伤的决定因素。结论:本研究得出结论,通过进行更广泛的荟萃分析研究和最小化限制因素来选择心脏截瘫方法是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信