Structural Validity and Reliability of an Adapted Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index for Primary Health Care Nurses.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo, Cristina Rey-Reñones, Ana Marchal-Torralbo, Gloria Sauch-Valmaña, Gemma Calvet-Tort, Carme Planas-Campmany, Isabel Barnés-Vallés, Ana-María Urpí-Fernández, Juan-José Zamora-Sánchez, Montserrat Artigas-Lage, Iraida Gimeno-Pi, Miguel-Ángel Díaz-Herrera, Ana Ríos-Jiménez, Núria Brunet-Reverté, Anna Reñé-Reñé
{"title":"Structural Validity and Reliability of an Adapted Practice Environment Scale-Nursing Work Index for Primary Health Care Nurses.","authors":"Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo, Cristina Rey-Reñones, Ana Marchal-Torralbo, Gloria Sauch-Valmaña, Gemma Calvet-Tort, Carme Planas-Campmany, Isabel Barnés-Vallés, Ana-María Urpí-Fernández, Juan-José Zamora-Sánchez, Montserrat Artigas-Lage, Iraida Gimeno-Pi, Miguel-Ángel Díaz-Herrera, Ana Ríos-Jiménez, Núria Brunet-Reverté, Anna Reñé-Reñé","doi":"10.1002/nur.22474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) is widely used to assess nursing practice environments; however, existing versions available for primary health care still need to capture the unique aspects of this healthcare setting fully. This study aimed to develop and validate an adapted PES-NWI version tailored for primary health care. A cross-sectional study and a test-retest design were conducted among primary health care nurses. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, while internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated through Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), respectively. A total of 528 nurses participated, achieving a response rate of 78% with minimal missing data (0-0.6%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit, with subscale Cronbach's alpha values between 0.70 and 0.95. Test-retest reliability was strong, with ICCs above 0.70. The adapted PES-NWI demonstrated adequate structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability, supporting its use in primary health care. This adapted measurement tool can support nursing workforce policies by improving the assessment of work environments in primary health care settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No direct patient or public involvement. Primary health care nurses contributed to the content validity assessment of the adapted PES-NWI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) is widely used to assess nursing practice environments; however, existing versions available for primary health care still need to capture the unique aspects of this healthcare setting fully. This study aimed to develop and validate an adapted PES-NWI version tailored for primary health care. A cross-sectional study and a test-retest design were conducted among primary health care nurses. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis, while internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated through Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), respectively. A total of 528 nurses participated, achieving a response rate of 78% with minimal missing data (0-0.6%). The confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit, with subscale Cronbach's alpha values between 0.70 and 0.95. Test-retest reliability was strong, with ICCs above 0.70. The adapted PES-NWI demonstrated adequate structural validity, internal consistency, and reliability, supporting its use in primary health care. This adapted measurement tool can support nursing workforce policies by improving the assessment of work environments in primary health care settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No direct patient or public involvement. Primary health care nurses contributed to the content validity assessment of the adapted PES-NWI.

适应实践环境量表-初级卫生保健护士护理工作指标的结构效度和信度。
护理工作指数实践环境量表(PES-NWI)被广泛用于评估护理实践环境;然而,用于初级卫生保健的现有版本仍然需要充分捕捉这种卫生保健环境的独特方面。本研究旨在开发和验证适合初级卫生保健的PES-NWI版本。采用横断面研究和重测设计对初级卫生保健护士进行调查。结构效度采用验证性因子分析评估,内部一致性和重测信度分别采用Cronbach’s alpha和类内相关系数(ICCs)评估。共有528名护士参与调查,回复率为78%,数据缺失率最低(0-0.6%)。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好,子量表Cronbach’s alpha值在0.70 ~ 0.95之间。重测信度强,ICCs大于0.70。经过调整的PES-NWI显示出足够的结构有效性、内部一致性和可靠性,支持其在初级卫生保健中的使用。这一经过调整的测量工具可以通过改进对初级卫生保健机构工作环境的评估来支持护理人力政策。患者或公众贡献:无患者或公众直接参与。初级卫生保健护士参与了修改后的PES-NWI的内容效度评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信