A Breast cAncer Survivorship Inter-Professional Community (BASIC) Shared Care Model to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Singapore: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Yu Ke, Rose Wai Yee Fok, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Lita Chew, Wei Teen Wong, Charmaine Shuyi Kwan, Wing Lam Chung, Kiley Wei-Jen Loh, Gretchen Ser Hua Tan, Ivy Cheng, Joyce Yu-Chia Lee, Alexandre Chan
{"title":"A Breast cAncer Survivorship Inter-Professional Community (BASIC) Shared Care Model to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Singapore: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yu Ke, Rose Wai Yee Fok, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Lita Chew, Wei Teen Wong, Charmaine Shuyi Kwan, Wing Lam Chung, Kiley Wei-Jen Loh, Gretchen Ser Hua Tan, Ivy Cheng, Joyce Yu-Chia Lee, Alexandre Chan","doi":"10.1007/s12529-025-10372-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a shared care model combining oncologists' and primary care providers' expertise to help cancer survivors manage their health and adopt healthier behaviors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This open-label RCT recruited 70 breast cancer survivors from the National Cancer Centre Singapore between 03/2021-07/2022. Eligible participants (≥ 21 years, ≥ 3 years post-treatment, ECOG status 0-2, deemed low risk by oncologists), were randomized (1:1) to receive shared care or usual care with 1-year follow-up. Shared care recipients completed the Distress Thermometer and Problem List before consulting a family physician and received 3-monthly teleconsultations with community pharmacists. Care was coordinated through survivorship care plans. Outcomes included process measures, preliminary effectiveness (quality of life, functioning, distress, activity, comorbidity control), and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average enrolment rate was four participants/week, with disinterest and scheduling conflicts cited as common reasons for rejection. The mean(SD) age of participants was 61.1 (6.6) years. Shared care recipients (n = 33) attended a median of 2 (range 0-6) family physician visits, with 87.9% completing three pharmacist telehealth consults. Retention rate was 96% and questionnaire completion rate was ≥ 90%. Compared to usual care recipients (n = 35), shared care recipients reported higher social functioning (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.47(- 0.04,0.98)), lower physical symptom distress (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.54(0.02,1.05)), and higher activity levels (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.38(- 0.13,0.88)) after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The moderate positive effects of shared care observed on social functioning, physical symptoms, and activity levels in this pilot warrant validation in a full-scale RCT targeting survivors with greater comorbidity burden and optimized care coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":54208,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-025-10372-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a shared care model combining oncologists' and primary care providers' expertise to help cancer survivors manage their health and adopt healthier behaviors.

Method: This open-label RCT recruited 70 breast cancer survivors from the National Cancer Centre Singapore between 03/2021-07/2022. Eligible participants (≥ 21 years, ≥ 3 years post-treatment, ECOG status 0-2, deemed low risk by oncologists), were randomized (1:1) to receive shared care or usual care with 1-year follow-up. Shared care recipients completed the Distress Thermometer and Problem List before consulting a family physician and received 3-monthly teleconsultations with community pharmacists. Care was coordinated through survivorship care plans. Outcomes included process measures, preliminary effectiveness (quality of life, functioning, distress, activity, comorbidity control), and acceptability.

Results: Average enrolment rate was four participants/week, with disinterest and scheduling conflicts cited as common reasons for rejection. The mean(SD) age of participants was 61.1 (6.6) years. Shared care recipients (n = 33) attended a median of 2 (range 0-6) family physician visits, with 87.9% completing three pharmacist telehealth consults. Retention rate was 96% and questionnaire completion rate was ≥ 90%. Compared to usual care recipients (n = 35), shared care recipients reported higher social functioning (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.47(- 0.04,0.98)), lower physical symptom distress (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.54(0.02,1.05)), and higher activity levels (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.38(- 0.13,0.88)) after 1 year.

Conclusion: The moderate positive effects of shared care observed on social functioning, physical symptoms, and activity levels in this pilot warrant validation in a full-scale RCT targeting survivors with greater comorbidity burden and optimized care coordination.

乳腺癌幸存者跨专业社区(BASIC)共享护理模式在新加坡促进健康行为:一项试点随机对照试验
背景:本试点研究评估了随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性和可接受性,以评估肿瘤医生和初级保健提供者的专业知识相结合的共享护理模式,以帮助癌症幸存者管理他们的健康并采取更健康的行为。方法:这项开放标签随机对照试验在2021年3月至2022年7月期间从新加坡国家癌症中心招募了70名乳腺癌幸存者。符合条件的参与者(≥21岁,治疗后≥3年,ECOG状态0-2,肿瘤学家认为低风险)随机(1:1)接受共享治疗或常规治疗,随访1年。接受共同护理的患者在咨询家庭医生之前完成了窘迫温度计和问题清单,并接受了3个月的社区药剂师远程会诊。护理通过幸存者护理计划进行协调。结果包括过程测量、初步有效性(生活质量、功能、痛苦、活动、合并症控制)和可接受性。结果:平均报名率为4人/周,不感兴趣和日程冲突是被拒绝的常见原因。参与者的平均(SD)年龄为61.1(6.6)岁。共享护理接受者(n = 33)中位数为2次(范围0-6)家庭医生就诊,87.9%完成了3次药剂师远程医疗咨询。问卷保留率96%,问卷完成率≥90%。与普通照护者(n = 35)相比,共同照护者在1年后报告了更高的社会功能(Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.47(- 0.04,0.98)),更低的身体症状痛苦(Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.54(0.02,1.05))和更高的活动水平(Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.38(- 0.13,0.88))。结论:在这个试点中,共同护理对社会功能、身体症状和活动水平的中度积极影响值得在一项针对合并症负担更重和优化护理协调的幸存者的全面随机对照试验中验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM) is the official scientific journal of the International Society for Behavioral Medicine (ISBM). IJBM seeks to present the best theoretically-driven, evidence-based work in the field of behavioral medicine from around the globe. IJBM embraces multiple theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, groups of interest, and levels of analysis. The journal is interested in research across the broad spectrum of behavioral medicine, including health-behavior relationships, the prevention of illness and the promotion of health, the effects of illness on the self and others, the effectiveness of novel interventions, identification of biobehavioral mechanisms, and the influence of social factors on health. We welcome experimental, non-experimental, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as implementation and dissemination research, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信