A Breast cAncer Survivorship Inter-Professional Community (BASIC) Shared Care Model to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Singapore: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
{"title":"A Breast cAncer Survivorship Inter-Professional Community (BASIC) Shared Care Model to Promote Healthy Behaviors in Singapore: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yu Ke, Rose Wai Yee Fok, Ngiap Chuan Tan, Lita Chew, Wei Teen Wong, Charmaine Shuyi Kwan, Wing Lam Chung, Kiley Wei-Jen Loh, Gretchen Ser Hua Tan, Ivy Cheng, Joyce Yu-Chia Lee, Alexandre Chan","doi":"10.1007/s12529-025-10372-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a shared care model combining oncologists' and primary care providers' expertise to help cancer survivors manage their health and adopt healthier behaviors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This open-label RCT recruited 70 breast cancer survivors from the National Cancer Centre Singapore between 03/2021-07/2022. Eligible participants (≥ 21 years, ≥ 3 years post-treatment, ECOG status 0-2, deemed low risk by oncologists), were randomized (1:1) to receive shared care or usual care with 1-year follow-up. Shared care recipients completed the Distress Thermometer and Problem List before consulting a family physician and received 3-monthly teleconsultations with community pharmacists. Care was coordinated through survivorship care plans. Outcomes included process measures, preliminary effectiveness (quality of life, functioning, distress, activity, comorbidity control), and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average enrolment rate was four participants/week, with disinterest and scheduling conflicts cited as common reasons for rejection. The mean(SD) age of participants was 61.1 (6.6) years. Shared care recipients (n = 33) attended a median of 2 (range 0-6) family physician visits, with 87.9% completing three pharmacist telehealth consults. Retention rate was 96% and questionnaire completion rate was ≥ 90%. Compared to usual care recipients (n = 35), shared care recipients reported higher social functioning (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.47(- 0.04,0.98)), lower physical symptom distress (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.54(0.02,1.05)), and higher activity levels (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.38(- 0.13,0.88)) after 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The moderate positive effects of shared care observed on social functioning, physical symptoms, and activity levels in this pilot warrant validation in a full-scale RCT targeting survivors with greater comorbidity burden and optimized care coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":54208,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-025-10372-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a shared care model combining oncologists' and primary care providers' expertise to help cancer survivors manage their health and adopt healthier behaviors.
Method: This open-label RCT recruited 70 breast cancer survivors from the National Cancer Centre Singapore between 03/2021-07/2022. Eligible participants (≥ 21 years, ≥ 3 years post-treatment, ECOG status 0-2, deemed low risk by oncologists), were randomized (1:1) to receive shared care or usual care with 1-year follow-up. Shared care recipients completed the Distress Thermometer and Problem List before consulting a family physician and received 3-monthly teleconsultations with community pharmacists. Care was coordinated through survivorship care plans. Outcomes included process measures, preliminary effectiveness (quality of life, functioning, distress, activity, comorbidity control), and acceptability.
Results: Average enrolment rate was four participants/week, with disinterest and scheduling conflicts cited as common reasons for rejection. The mean(SD) age of participants was 61.1 (6.6) years. Shared care recipients (n = 33) attended a median of 2 (range 0-6) family physician visits, with 87.9% completing three pharmacist telehealth consults. Retention rate was 96% and questionnaire completion rate was ≥ 90%. Compared to usual care recipients (n = 35), shared care recipients reported higher social functioning (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.47(- 0.04,0.98)), lower physical symptom distress (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.54(0.02,1.05)), and higher activity levels (Cohen's d(95%CI) = 0.38(- 0.13,0.88)) after 1 year.
Conclusion: The moderate positive effects of shared care observed on social functioning, physical symptoms, and activity levels in this pilot warrant validation in a full-scale RCT targeting survivors with greater comorbidity burden and optimized care coordination.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM) is the official scientific journal of the International Society for Behavioral Medicine (ISBM). IJBM seeks to present the best theoretically-driven, evidence-based work in the field of behavioral medicine from around the globe. IJBM embraces multiple theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, groups of interest, and levels of analysis. The journal is interested in research across the broad spectrum of behavioral medicine, including health-behavior relationships, the prevention of illness and the promotion of health, the effects of illness on the self and others, the effectiveness of novel interventions, identification of biobehavioral mechanisms, and the influence of social factors on health. We welcome experimental, non-experimental, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as implementation and dissemination research, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses.