The assessment of grip strength in preschool-aged children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Griet Dequeker, Emma Detobel, Ellen Dillen, Marie Heymans, Lize Kleeren, Els Ortibus, Lisa Mailleux
{"title":"The assessment of grip strength in preschool-aged children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy.","authors":"Griet Dequeker, Emma Detobel, Ellen Dillen, Marie Heymans, Lize Kleeren, Els Ortibus, Lisa Mailleux","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2512586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate reliability and validity of two grip strength devices in children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP) aged 2-6 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We assessed grip strength in 20 pre-school-aged children with predominantly spastic uCP (mean age 4y0 ± 1y2m) and 20 age-matched children without uCP (mean age 3y11m ± 1y3m) using the Martin Vigorimeter and MyoGrip to investigate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients; ICC), known-group validity (comparative statistics) and convergent validity (correlation analyses) in a cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, test-retest reliability was excellent for both devices and both hands (ICC 0.91-0.97). Grip strength of the non-preferred hand was lower in children with uCP for both devices (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Grip strength was decreased in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand in children with uCP for both devices (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In children without uCP, grip strength was lower in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand only for the MyoGrip (<i>p</i> = 0.02). The relation between both devices for both hands was good to very high (<i>r</i> = 0.62-0.92, <i>p</i> < 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both devices can be implemented in clinical practice to assess grip strength in preschool-aged children with uCP. Only the MyoGrip detected differences between both hands in children without uCP and might be more sensitive.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2512586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate reliability and validity of two grip strength devices in children with and without unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP) aged 2-6 years.

Method: We assessed grip strength in 20 pre-school-aged children with predominantly spastic uCP (mean age 4y0 ± 1y2m) and 20 age-matched children without uCP (mean age 3y11m ± 1y3m) using the Martin Vigorimeter and MyoGrip to investigate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients; ICC), known-group validity (comparative statistics) and convergent validity (correlation analyses) in a cross-sectional design.

Results: In both groups, test-retest reliability was excellent for both devices and both hands (ICC 0.91-0.97). Grip strength of the non-preferred hand was lower in children with uCP for both devices (p < 0.001). Grip strength was decreased in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand in children with uCP for both devices (p < 0.001). In children without uCP, grip strength was lower in the non-preferred compared to the preferred hand only for the MyoGrip (p = 0.02). The relation between both devices for both hands was good to very high (r = 0.62-0.92, p < 0.007).

Conclusion: Both devices can be implemented in clinical practice to assess grip strength in preschool-aged children with uCP. Only the MyoGrip detected differences between both hands in children without uCP and might be more sensitive.

学龄前儿童单侧脑瘫和非单侧脑瘫的握力评估。
目的:探讨两种握力装置在2 ~ 6岁单侧脑瘫(uCP)患儿中的信度和效度。方法:采用Martin Vigorimeter和MyoGrip对20例以痉挛性uCP为主的学龄前儿童(平均年龄4岁±1岁2米)和20例年龄匹配的无uCP儿童(平均年龄3岁11米±1岁3米)的握力进行评估,研究重测信度(类内相关系数;在横断面设计中,已知组效度(比较统计)和收敛效度(相关分析)。结果:两组设备和双手的重测信度均极好(ICC 0.91-0.97)。两种设备的uCP患儿非首选手的握力较低(p p p = 0.02)。结论:两种仪器均可应用于学龄前uCP患儿握力评估。只有MyoGrip检测到没有uCP的儿童双手之间的差异,可能更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信