Generating synthetic electronic health record data: a methodological scoping review with benchmarking on phenotype data and open-source software.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Xingran Chen, Zhenke Wu, Xu Shi, Hyunghoon Cho, Bhramar Mukherjee
{"title":"Generating synthetic electronic health record data: a methodological scoping review with benchmarking on phenotype data and open-source software.","authors":"Xingran Chen, Zhenke Wu, Xu Shi, Hyunghoon Cho, Bhramar Mukherjee","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a scoping review (ScR) of existing approaches for synthetic Electronic Health Records (EHR) data generation, to benchmark major methods, and to provide an open-source software and offer recommendations for practitioners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We search three academic databases for our scoping review. Methods are benchmarked on open-source EHR datasets, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and IV (MIMIC-III/IV). Seven existing methods covering major categories and two baseline methods are implemented and compared. Evaluation metrics concern data fidelity, downstream utility, privacy protection, and computational cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight studies are identified and classified into five categories. Seven open-source methods covering all categories are selected, trained on MIMIC-III, and evaluated on MIMIC-III or MIMIC-IV for transportability considerations. Among them, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based methods demonstrate competitive performance in fidelity and utility on MIMIC-III, rule-based methods excel in privacy protection. Similar findings are observed on MIMIC-IV, except that GAN-based methods further outperform the baseline methods in preserving fidelity.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Method choice is governed by the relative importance of the evaluation metrics in downstream use cases. We provide a decision tree to guide the choice among the benchmarked methods. An extensible Python package, \"SynthEHRella\", is provided to facilitate streamlined evaluations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GAN-based methods excel when distributional shifts exist between the training and testing populations. Otherwise, CorGAN and MedGAN are most suitable for association modeling and predictive modeling, respectively. Future research should prioritize enhancing fidelity of the synthetic data while controlling privacy exposure, and comprehensive benchmarking of longitudinal or conditional generation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a scoping review (ScR) of existing approaches for synthetic Electronic Health Records (EHR) data generation, to benchmark major methods, and to provide an open-source software and offer recommendations for practitioners.

Materials and methods: We search three academic databases for our scoping review. Methods are benchmarked on open-source EHR datasets, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and IV (MIMIC-III/IV). Seven existing methods covering major categories and two baseline methods are implemented and compared. Evaluation metrics concern data fidelity, downstream utility, privacy protection, and computational cost.

Results: Forty-eight studies are identified and classified into five categories. Seven open-source methods covering all categories are selected, trained on MIMIC-III, and evaluated on MIMIC-III or MIMIC-IV for transportability considerations. Among them, Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based methods demonstrate competitive performance in fidelity and utility on MIMIC-III, rule-based methods excel in privacy protection. Similar findings are observed on MIMIC-IV, except that GAN-based methods further outperform the baseline methods in preserving fidelity.

Discussion: Method choice is governed by the relative importance of the evaluation metrics in downstream use cases. We provide a decision tree to guide the choice among the benchmarked methods. An extensible Python package, "SynthEHRella", is provided to facilitate streamlined evaluations.

Conclusion: GAN-based methods excel when distributional shifts exist between the training and testing populations. Otherwise, CorGAN and MedGAN are most suitable for association modeling and predictive modeling, respectively. Future research should prioritize enhancing fidelity of the synthetic data while controlling privacy exposure, and comprehensive benchmarking of longitudinal or conditional generation methods.

生成合成电子健康记录数据:对表型数据和开源软件进行基准测试的方法学范围审查。
目的:对合成电子健康记录(EHR)数据生成的现有方法进行范围审查(ScR),对主要方法进行基准测试,并提供开源软件并为从业者提供建议。材料和方法:我们检索了三个学术数据库来进行范围审查。方法以开源EHR数据集,重症监护医疗信息市场III和IV (MIMIC-III/IV)为基准。对涵盖主要类别的七种现有方法和两种基线方法进行了实施和比较。评估指标涉及数据保真度、下游效用、隐私保护和计算成本。结果:48项研究被确定并分为5类。选择了涵盖所有类别的七个开源方法,在MIMIC-III上进行了培训,并在MIMIC-III或MIMIC-IV上进行了可移植性评估。其中,基于生成对抗网络(GAN)的方法在MIMIC-III上的保真度和效用方面具有竞争力,基于规则的方法在隐私保护方面表现出色。在MIMIC-IV上观察到类似的结果,除了基于gan的方法在保持保真度方面进一步优于基线方法。讨论:方法选择是由下游用例中评估量度的相对重要性决定的。我们提供了一个决策树来指导在基准方法之间的选择。提供了一个可扩展的Python包“SynthEHRella”来简化计算。结论:当训练群体和测试群体之间存在分布变化时,基于gan的方法表现优异。另外,CorGAN和MedGAN分别最适合于关联建模和预测建模。未来的研究应优先考虑在控制隐私暴露的同时提高合成数据的保真度,并对纵向或条件生成方法进行全面的基准测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信