Identifying and Mitigating Latent Safety Threats in Neonatal Resuscitation Rooms Across Nine Hospitals Through In Situ Simulation Training.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jens-Christian Schwindt, Reinhold Stockenhuber, Sybille Haider, Bertram Schadler, Eva Schwindt
{"title":"Identifying and Mitigating Latent Safety Threats in Neonatal Resuscitation Rooms Across Nine Hospitals Through In Situ Simulation Training.","authors":"Jens-Christian Schwindt, Reinhold Stockenhuber, Sybille Haider, Bertram Schadler, Eva Schwindt","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To ensure effective care in rare events such as neonatal resuscitation, high levels of system safety and error management are essential. It is thus imperative to mitigate avoidable errors and latent safety threats (LSTs). This study examined the use of safety reports (SR) from 3-day interdisciplinary, high-fidelity neonatal in situ simulation trainings (SIMs) to classify LSTs and assess their recurrence or resolution across successive SIMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively screened the SR of 9 Austrian hospitals for LSTs and grouped the identified LSTs into 3 main categories: (1) equipment, environment, and ergonomics (EEE); (2) knowledge, skills and training (KST); and (3) systems, pathways, and resources (SPR). The LSTs from consecutive SR were compared for each hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A large number of LSTs were identified: 271 in 9 initial reports (SR1) and 129 in the 9 follow-ups (SR2). Comparing SR2 with SR1, fewer LSTs were reported in all 3 categories in all 9 hospitals (ranging from -37% to -79%). We detected fewer than half of the number of LSTs in SR2 for EEE (-62%). LSTs in KST were almost halved in SR2 (-45%), and marginally changed in SPR (-10%). A third SR (SR3) obtained in 4 hospitals indicated a further reduction in overall LSTs (-21% to -60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that SIMs effectively reduce LSTs in neonatal care, with SR highlighting significant improvements, particularly in equipment-related issues. SIMs prove to be a valuable tool for enhancing safety and driving continuous improvement in neonatal care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To ensure effective care in rare events such as neonatal resuscitation, high levels of system safety and error management are essential. It is thus imperative to mitigate avoidable errors and latent safety threats (LSTs). This study examined the use of safety reports (SR) from 3-day interdisciplinary, high-fidelity neonatal in situ simulation trainings (SIMs) to classify LSTs and assess their recurrence or resolution across successive SIMs.

Methods: We retrospectively screened the SR of 9 Austrian hospitals for LSTs and grouped the identified LSTs into 3 main categories: (1) equipment, environment, and ergonomics (EEE); (2) knowledge, skills and training (KST); and (3) systems, pathways, and resources (SPR). The LSTs from consecutive SR were compared for each hospital.

Results: A large number of LSTs were identified: 271 in 9 initial reports (SR1) and 129 in the 9 follow-ups (SR2). Comparing SR2 with SR1, fewer LSTs were reported in all 3 categories in all 9 hospitals (ranging from -37% to -79%). We detected fewer than half of the number of LSTs in SR2 for EEE (-62%). LSTs in KST were almost halved in SR2 (-45%), and marginally changed in SPR (-10%). A third SR (SR3) obtained in 4 hospitals indicated a further reduction in overall LSTs (-21% to -60%).

Conclusion: This study shows that SIMs effectively reduce LSTs in neonatal care, with SR highlighting significant improvements, particularly in equipment-related issues. SIMs prove to be a valuable tool for enhancing safety and driving continuous improvement in neonatal care settings.

通过现场模拟培训识别和减轻九家医院新生儿复苏室的潜在安全威胁。
引言:为了确保在新生儿复苏等罕见事件中的有效护理,高水平的系统安全性和错误管理是必不可少的。因此,必须减少可避免的错误和潜在的安全威胁(lst)。本研究利用为期3天的跨学科、高保真新生儿原位模拟训练(SIMs)的安全报告(SR)对lst进行分类,并评估其在连续模拟训练中的复发或缓解情况。方法:我们对奥地利9家医院的SR进行回顾性筛选,并将确定的lst分为3大类:(1)设备、环境和人体工程学(EEE);(2)知识、技能和培训(KST);(3)系统、途径和资源(SPR)。比较各医院连续SR的lst。结果:发现了大量的lst: 9例初次报告(SR1) 271例,9例随访(SR2) 129例。与SR2相比,在所有9家医院中,所有3个类别中报告的lst都较少(从-37%到-79%不等)。我们在SR2中检测到的lst数量不到EEE的一半(-62%)。在SR2中,KST的LSTs几乎减半(-45%),而在SPR中略有变化(-10%)。在4家医院获得的第三个SR (SR3)表明总体lst进一步降低(-21%至-60%)。结论:本研究表明,SIMs有效地减少了新生儿护理中的lst, SR突出了显著的改善,特别是在设备相关问题上。SIMs被证明是加强新生儿护理环境安全性和推动持续改进的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信