Surgical Desirability of Outcomes Ranking: Implications of Racial and Economic Privilege on Days at Home after Major Operation.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Giovanni Catalano, Laura Alaimo, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Odysseas P Chatzipanagiotou, Abdullah Altaf, Zayed Rashid, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Surgical Desirability of Outcomes Ranking: Implications of Racial and Economic Privilege on Days at Home after Major Operation.","authors":"Giovanni Catalano, Laura Alaimo, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Odysseas P Chatzipanagiotou, Abdullah Altaf, Zayed Rashid, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Racial and economic privilege can impact postoperative outcomes. We sought to assess the association of socioeconomic privilege with surgical outcomes using a composite measure called Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) and days at home within 90 days (DAH-90).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare claims data were used to identify patients who underwent a range of complex surgical procedures between 2016 and 2021. Socioeconomic privilege was measured using the Index of Concentration of Extremes (ICE) and regression analyses were performed to evaluate its association with surgical outcomes and days at home.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 445,872 patients, 62.4% (n=278,032) achieved the most desirable outcome (i.e., DOOR=1). Living in areas with the highest privilege was associated with lower odds of achieving less desirable outcomes (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.92-0.96; p<0.001) and increased days spent at home at the lower end of the distribution (0.10, 95%CI 0.02-0.19). A higher DOOR was associated with a reduction of 10 (95%CI -11.0 to -10.0), 2.8 (95%CI -2.8 to -2.7) and 1.2 (95%CI -1.2 to -1.1) days spent at home at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively. The model based on DOOR demonstrated improved goodness of fit despite increased complexity compared with a model using Textbook Outcome (TO) to predict days at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher DOOR was associated with lower DAH-90, whereas privileged patients had the highest probability of achieving the most desirable outcome and had increased DAH-90. A composite outcome ranking such as DOOR may provide more insight and improve detection of complex relationships between SDOH and surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Racial and economic privilege can impact postoperative outcomes. We sought to assess the association of socioeconomic privilege with surgical outcomes using a composite measure called Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) and days at home within 90 days (DAH-90).

Methods: Medicare claims data were used to identify patients who underwent a range of complex surgical procedures between 2016 and 2021. Socioeconomic privilege was measured using the Index of Concentration of Extremes (ICE) and regression analyses were performed to evaluate its association with surgical outcomes and days at home.

Results: Among 445,872 patients, 62.4% (n=278,032) achieved the most desirable outcome (i.e., DOOR=1). Living in areas with the highest privilege was associated with lower odds of achieving less desirable outcomes (OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.92-0.96; p<0.001) and increased days spent at home at the lower end of the distribution (0.10, 95%CI 0.02-0.19). A higher DOOR was associated with a reduction of 10 (95%CI -11.0 to -10.0), 2.8 (95%CI -2.8 to -2.7) and 1.2 (95%CI -1.2 to -1.1) days spent at home at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively. The model based on DOOR demonstrated improved goodness of fit despite increased complexity compared with a model using Textbook Outcome (TO) to predict days at home.

Conclusion: A higher DOOR was associated with lower DAH-90, whereas privileged patients had the highest probability of achieving the most desirable outcome and had increased DAH-90. A composite outcome ranking such as DOOR may provide more insight and improve detection of complex relationships between SDOH and surgical outcomes.

手术结果排序的可取性:大手术后在家的种族和经济特权的含义。
背景:种族和经济特权会影响术后结果。我们试图评估社会经济特权与手术结果的关系,使用一种称为结果排序可取性(DOOR)和90天内在家天数(ah -90)的综合测量方法。方法:医疗保险索赔数据用于识别2016年至2021年间接受一系列复杂外科手术的患者。使用极端浓度指数(ICE)测量社会经济特权,并进行回归分析以评估其与手术结果和在家天数的关系。结果:445,872例患者中,62.4% (n=278,032)达到了最理想的结局(即DOOR=1)。生活在享有最高特权的地区,获得不理想结果的几率较低(OR 0.94, 95%CI 0.92-0.96;结论:较高的DOOR与较低的DAH-90相关,而特权患者获得最理想结果的可能性最高,并且DAH-90增加。诸如DOOR这样的综合结果排序可以提供更多的见解,并改进对SDOH与手术结果之间复杂关系的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信