Impact of Early versus Delayed Surgical Intervention in Geriatric Acetabular Fractures on Transfusion Requirements.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Doriann M Alcaide, Travis Fortin, Nigel Blackwood, Matthew T Yeager, Hassan Ghomrawi, Clay A Spitler, Joey P Johnson
{"title":"Impact of Early versus Delayed Surgical Intervention in Geriatric Acetabular Fractures on Transfusion Requirements.","authors":"Doriann M Alcaide, Travis Fortin, Nigel Blackwood, Matthew T Yeager, Hassan Ghomrawi, Clay A Spitler, Joey P Johnson","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if fixation within 48 hours from injury reduces risk for transfusion in geriatric patients with acetabular fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Level I Trauma Center (2010-2023).</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients above 65 years of age with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for acetabular fractures (AO/OTA 62) were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients managed non-operatively, with closed reduction percutaneous fixation, acute total hip arthroplasty, staged ORIF and patients with operations with any blood loss prior to acetabular ORIF were excluded.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>The primary outcome was differences in transfusion requirements between patients who had early fixation (within 48 hours) and those who had delayed fixation (after 48 hours). Secondary outcomes included differences in length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical site infection (SSI), and mortality. Logistic regression for likelihood of transfusion during hospitalization and SSI were done and included surgical timing, surgical approach, hemoglobin at admission, TXA administration, preoperative transfusion, and intraoperative transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 132 patients included in the study, 86 (65.9%) underwent early fixation and 45 (34.1%) delayed fixation. The early fixation group had an average age of 73.8 (65-89) and the delayed group of 73.4 (65-89) (p=0.797) and both had male majority (63.2% and 73.3%, respectively). Early fixation group had less injuries from high energy trauma (52.3% vs 75.0%;p=0.013) but no difference in injury severity scores (9 vs 11.1;p=0.184) or complex fracture patterns (69.0% vs 68.9%;p=0.993). Patients with early fixation had higher rates of anterior approaches (58.6% vs 35.6%;p=0.042) and shorter surgical time (136 vs 169 min;p=0.013). There was no statistically significant difference in rates of transfusion between early and delayed fixation (62.1% vs 73.3%;p=0.196). Early fixation group had more units of blood during overall hospital stay (5.1 vs 2.4; p=0.003). Early fixation was also associated with shorter LOS (7.1 days vs 13.5 days; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in EBL, SSI or mortality. Surgical timing did not independently influence SSI risk (p=0.913) or likelihood of transfusion (p=0.273) but early fixation increased the volume of units transfused (p=0.0143).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early fixation was associated with shorter LOS and operative times. Although the overall transfusion rate did not differ significantly between groups, early fixation demonstrated an increased risk for a higher volume of blood transfused among patients requiring transfusions. Surgical timing did not influence risk for SSI or likelihood of transfusion during hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if fixation within 48 hours from injury reduces risk for transfusion in geriatric patients with acetabular fractures.

Methods: Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Single Level I Trauma Center (2010-2023).

Patient selection criteria: Patients above 65 years of age with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for acetabular fractures (AO/OTA 62) were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients managed non-operatively, with closed reduction percutaneous fixation, acute total hip arthroplasty, staged ORIF and patients with operations with any blood loss prior to acetabular ORIF were excluded.

Outcome measures and comparisons: The primary outcome was differences in transfusion requirements between patients who had early fixation (within 48 hours) and those who had delayed fixation (after 48 hours). Secondary outcomes included differences in length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical site infection (SSI), and mortality. Logistic regression for likelihood of transfusion during hospitalization and SSI were done and included surgical timing, surgical approach, hemoglobin at admission, TXA administration, preoperative transfusion, and intraoperative transfusion.

Results: Of 132 patients included in the study, 86 (65.9%) underwent early fixation and 45 (34.1%) delayed fixation. The early fixation group had an average age of 73.8 (65-89) and the delayed group of 73.4 (65-89) (p=0.797) and both had male majority (63.2% and 73.3%, respectively). Early fixation group had less injuries from high energy trauma (52.3% vs 75.0%;p=0.013) but no difference in injury severity scores (9 vs 11.1;p=0.184) or complex fracture patterns (69.0% vs 68.9%;p=0.993). Patients with early fixation had higher rates of anterior approaches (58.6% vs 35.6%;p=0.042) and shorter surgical time (136 vs 169 min;p=0.013). There was no statistically significant difference in rates of transfusion between early and delayed fixation (62.1% vs 73.3%;p=0.196). Early fixation group had more units of blood during overall hospital stay (5.1 vs 2.4; p=0.003). Early fixation was also associated with shorter LOS (7.1 days vs 13.5 days; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in EBL, SSI or mortality. Surgical timing did not independently influence SSI risk (p=0.913) or likelihood of transfusion (p=0.273) but early fixation increased the volume of units transfused (p=0.0143).

Conclusion: Early fixation was associated with shorter LOS and operative times. Although the overall transfusion rate did not differ significantly between groups, early fixation demonstrated an increased risk for a higher volume of blood transfused among patients requiring transfusions. Surgical timing did not influence risk for SSI or likelihood of transfusion during hospital stay.

Level of evidence: III.

老年髋臼骨折早期与延迟手术干预对输血需求的影响。
目的:确定损伤后48小时内固定是否能降低老年髋臼骨折患者输血的风险。方法:设计:回顾性。单位:单一一级创伤中心(2010-2023)。患者选择标准:采用开放复位内固定(ORIF)治疗髋臼骨折(AO/OTA 62)的患者年龄大于65岁,使用现行手术术语编码进行鉴定。排除非手术治疗的患者,经皮闭合复位固定,急性全髋关节置换术,分阶段ORIF以及在髋臼ORIF之前有失血的患者。结果测量和比较:主要结果是早期固定(48小时内)和延迟固定(48小时后)患者输血需求的差异。次要结局包括住院时间(LOS)、估计失血量(EBL)、手术部位感染(SSI)和死亡率的差异。对住院期间输血和SSI的可能性进行Logistic回归,包括手术时机、手术入路、入院时血红蛋白、TXA给药、术前输血和术中输血。结果:纳入研究的132例患者中,86例(65.9%)接受了早期固定,45例(34.1%)接受了延迟固定。早期固定组平均年龄为73.8岁(65 ~ 89),延迟固定组平均年龄为73.4岁(65 ~ 89)(p=0.797),均以男性居多(分别为63.2%和73.3%)。早期固定组高能外伤损伤较少(52.3%比75.0%,p=0.013),但损伤严重程度评分(9比11.1,p=0.184)和复杂骨折类型(69.0%比68.9%,p=0.993)差异无统计学意义。早期固定的患者前路入路率较高(58.6% vs 35.6%, p=0.042),手术时间较短(136 vs 169 min, p=0.013)。早期和延迟固定的输血率差异无统计学意义(62.1% vs 73.3%;p=0.196)。早期固定组在整个住院期间有更多的血单位(5.1 vs 2.4;p = 0.003)。早期固定也与较短的LOS相关(7.1天vs 13.5天;结论:早期内固定与较短的LOS和手术时间有关。尽管两组之间的总体输血率没有显著差异,但在需要输血的患者中,早期固定显示出更高输血量的风险增加。手术时间不影响SSI的风险或住院期间输血的可能性。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信