Biocompatibility and Effectiveness of Amphotericin B-Loaded Metal-Organic Structures (AmB-ZIF-8) as Dermal Drug Transporters in Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.
{"title":"Biocompatibility and Effectiveness of Amphotericin B-Loaded Metal-Organic Structures (AmB-ZIF-8) as Dermal Drug Transporters in Experimental Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.","authors":"Heider Carreño, Jorge Osorio, Enrique Mejía-Ospino, Patricia Escobar","doi":"10.2147/JEP.S511808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as topical drug delivery systems (DDS) for antileishmanial drugs is limited. This study outlines our strategies for developing MOF-drug conjugate as a topical treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in mice infected with <i>Leishmania (L). amazonensis</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected conjugates from two commercial MOFs (ZIF-8 and Fe-BTC) and seven antileishmanial compounds. Amphotericin B (AmB) and zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (AmB@ZIF-8) were chosen and prepared at an AmB: ZIF-8 ratio of 1.5:1.0 using the impregnation method. Conjugates were characterised using dynamic light scattering, UV-Vis, FTIR, and SEM. Hydrogels were prepared and evaluated for toxicity and efficacy in CL-BALB/c mice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited a 59.6% loading capacity, 6.67% encapsulation efficiency, and 2% in vitro drug release (IVR). The particle size of AmB@ZIF-8 was smaller and more polydisperse than ZIF-8 (1370 nm vs 2537 nm). The conjugation of AmB to ZIF-8 was demonstrated. AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited similar antileishmanial activity to AmB against promastigotes. Topical 0.5% AmB@ZIF-8 and 0.5% AmB hydrogels, administered for 30 days, were unable to decrease lesion sizes or parasite loads. Initially, there was stabilisation of the lesion size; however, the lesions subsequently increased considerably during the 30-day follow-up period. The MOF-hydrogel treatment was non-irritating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were very low EE% and AmB IVR. AmB@ZIF-8 and AmB hydrogels were found to be safe but ineffective against CL-infected mice. Several factors may explain these negative results, including the large size of the commercial ZIF-8, the aggregation of AmB in solution, the excess AmB used for impregnation, and the conditions of the IVR assay. We suggest continuing to use ZIF-8 as a DDS due to its sensitivity to acidic pH levels; however, we recommend reducing the particle size and lowering the drug-to-ZIF-8 ratio. Other alternatives are discussed in the present paper. We also advocate investigating alternative antileishmanial drugs as cargo, such as miltefosine or pentamidine.</p>","PeriodicalId":15846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology","volume":"17 ","pages":"269-286"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JEP.S511808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Information on metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as topical drug delivery systems (DDS) for antileishmanial drugs is limited. This study outlines our strategies for developing MOF-drug conjugate as a topical treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in mice infected with Leishmania (L). amazonensis.
Methods: We selected conjugates from two commercial MOFs (ZIF-8 and Fe-BTC) and seven antileishmanial compounds. Amphotericin B (AmB) and zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (AmB@ZIF-8) were chosen and prepared at an AmB: ZIF-8 ratio of 1.5:1.0 using the impregnation method. Conjugates were characterised using dynamic light scattering, UV-Vis, FTIR, and SEM. Hydrogels were prepared and evaluated for toxicity and efficacy in CL-BALB/c mice.
Results: AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited a 59.6% loading capacity, 6.67% encapsulation efficiency, and 2% in vitro drug release (IVR). The particle size of AmB@ZIF-8 was smaller and more polydisperse than ZIF-8 (1370 nm vs 2537 nm). The conjugation of AmB to ZIF-8 was demonstrated. AmB@ZIF-8 exhibited similar antileishmanial activity to AmB against promastigotes. Topical 0.5% AmB@ZIF-8 and 0.5% AmB hydrogels, administered for 30 days, were unable to decrease lesion sizes or parasite loads. Initially, there was stabilisation of the lesion size; however, the lesions subsequently increased considerably during the 30-day follow-up period. The MOF-hydrogel treatment was non-irritating.
Conclusion: There were very low EE% and AmB IVR. AmB@ZIF-8 and AmB hydrogels were found to be safe but ineffective against CL-infected mice. Several factors may explain these negative results, including the large size of the commercial ZIF-8, the aggregation of AmB in solution, the excess AmB used for impregnation, and the conditions of the IVR assay. We suggest continuing to use ZIF-8 as a DDS due to its sensitivity to acidic pH levels; however, we recommend reducing the particle size and lowering the drug-to-ZIF-8 ratio. Other alternatives are discussed in the present paper. We also advocate investigating alternative antileishmanial drugs as cargo, such as miltefosine or pentamidine.