Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kylie Fletcher, Marc Machaalani, Razane El Hajj Chehade, Amin H Nassar, Rashad Nawfal, Michael Manos, Alexander M Menzies, Frank Aboubakar-Nana, Jessica C Hassel, David J Pinato, Alexandra Johnson, Anna C Olsson-Brown, Matteo S Carlino, Andrea Malgeri, Alessio Cortellini, Aditi Singh, Kaushal Parikh, So Yeon Kim, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, Georgina V Long, Pavan Challa, Toni K Choueiri, Elad Sharon, Shailee Shah, Douglas B Johnson
{"title":"Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders.","authors":"Kylie Fletcher, Marc Machaalani, Razane El Hajj Chehade, Amin H Nassar, Rashad Nawfal, Michael Manos, Alexander M Menzies, Frank Aboubakar-Nana, Jessica C Hassel, David J Pinato, Alexandra Johnson, Anna C Olsson-Brown, Matteo S Carlino, Andrea Malgeri, Alessio Cortellini, Aditi Singh, Kaushal Parikh, So Yeon Kim, Abdul Rafeh Naqash, Georgina V Long, Pavan Challa, Toni K Choueiri, Elad Sharon, Shailee Shah, Douglas B Johnson","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are efficacious in many cancer types but can produce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As such, patients with preexisting autoimmune disorders are often excluded from clinical trials, although subsequent studies have shown that many of these patients have acceptable ICI tolerance. The safety and efficacy of ICIs among patients with preexisting neurologic autoimmune disorders (NAIDs) is not well characterized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes associated with ICI therapy among patients with NAIDs.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with cancer who were treated with ICIs between October 2013 and May 2023 and had preexisting multiple sclerosis (MS), myasthenia gravis (MG), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and other NAIDs as well as a control cohort of patients with Parkinson disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>ICI therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Demographic and clinical characteristics (neurologic disability, active or recent immunosuppression), ICI outcomes (response, progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]), and safety outcomes (NAID exacerbation, irAEs) were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 patients were included; the median (range) age was 72 (40-88) years, 84 (62%) were men, and 51 (38%) were women. A total of 45 patients had MS; 18, MG; 10, GBS; 5, another NAID; and 57, PD. Exacerbations occurred most frequently in MG (12 of 18 patients [67%]), often resulting in hospitalization (6 [50%]) or death (2 [17%]), with much lower rates in the MS cohort (8 of 45 patients [18%]). Ten patients with a history of GBS tolerated ICI without exacerbations, although 1 developed a fatal case of Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome following ICI treatment. No differences in response rate, PFS, or OS were observed between NAID groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of ICI use in NAIDs, patients with MG had frequent and more severe exacerbations, while those with MS had few exacerbations. No obvious differences in survival between groups were observed. ICI may be an option for many patients with appropriate oncologic indications and preexisting NAIDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 6","pages":"e2513727"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are efficacious in many cancer types but can produce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As such, patients with preexisting autoimmune disorders are often excluded from clinical trials, although subsequent studies have shown that many of these patients have acceptable ICI tolerance. The safety and efficacy of ICIs among patients with preexisting neurologic autoimmune disorders (NAIDs) is not well characterized.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes associated with ICI therapy among patients with NAIDs.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with cancer who were treated with ICIs between October 2013 and May 2023 and had preexisting multiple sclerosis (MS), myasthenia gravis (MG), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and other NAIDs as well as a control cohort of patients with Parkinson disease (PD).

Exposure: ICI therapy.

Main outcomes and measures: Demographic and clinical characteristics (neurologic disability, active or recent immunosuppression), ICI outcomes (response, progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]), and safety outcomes (NAID exacerbation, irAEs) were collected.

Results: A total of 135 patients were included; the median (range) age was 72 (40-88) years, 84 (62%) were men, and 51 (38%) were women. A total of 45 patients had MS; 18, MG; 10, GBS; 5, another NAID; and 57, PD. Exacerbations occurred most frequently in MG (12 of 18 patients [67%]), often resulting in hospitalization (6 [50%]) or death (2 [17%]), with much lower rates in the MS cohort (8 of 45 patients [18%]). Ten patients with a history of GBS tolerated ICI without exacerbations, although 1 developed a fatal case of Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome following ICI treatment. No differences in response rate, PFS, or OS were observed between NAID groups.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of ICI use in NAIDs, patients with MG had frequent and more severe exacerbations, while those with MS had few exacerbations. No obvious differences in survival between groups were observed. ICI may be an option for many patients with appropriate oncologic indications and preexisting NAIDs.

免疫检查点抑制剂对既往自身免疫性神经疾病患者的作用
重要性:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)对许多癌症类型有效,但可能产生免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。因此,既往存在自身免疫性疾病的患者通常被排除在临床试验之外,尽管随后的研究表明,这些患者中的许多人具有可接受的ICI耐受性。ICIs在既往存在的神经自身免疫性疾病(NAIDs)患者中的安全性和有效性尚未得到很好的表征。目的:评价非艾滋病患者使用ICI治疗的安全性和临床结果。设计、环境和参与者:这项多中心回顾性队列研究包括2013年10月至2023年5月期间接受ICIs治疗的癌症患者,既往存在多发性硬化症(MS)、重症肌无力(MG)、吉兰-巴勒综合征(GBS)和其他NAIDs,以及帕金森病(PD)患者的对照队列。暴露:ICI治疗。主要结局和指标:收集人口统计学和临床特征(神经功能障碍、活性或近期免疫抑制)、ICI结局(反应、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS))和安全性结局(NAID恶化,irAEs)。结果:共纳入135例患者;年龄中位数(范围)为72岁(40-88岁),男性84岁(62%),女性51岁(38%)。共有45例患者出现MS;18毫克;10 gb;5、另一个NAID;57岁,PD。MG患者最常发生急性加重(18例患者中有12例[67%]),通常导致住院(6例[50%])或死亡(2例[17%]),而MS患者的发生率要低得多(45例患者中有8例[18%])。10例有GBS病史的患者耐受ICI,没有恶化,尽管1例在ICI治疗后出现了致命的兰伯特-伊顿肌无力综合征。NAID组间的反应率、PFS或OS均无差异。结论及相关性:在这项关于非艾滋病患者使用ICI的队列研究中,MG患者有频繁且更严重的恶化,而MS患者很少有恶化。各组间生存率无明显差异。ICI可能是许多有适当肿瘤适应症和既往NAIDs患者的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信