Impact of medications on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kiyoshi Minohara, Takuma Matoba, Michi Sawabe, Daisuke Kawakita, Gaku Takano, Keisuke Oguri, Akihiro Murashima, Sho Iwaki, Hiroshi Tsuge, Sae Imaizumi, Koji Tsukamoto, Ayano Kondo, Keiichiro Shingaki, Sekai Kikuchi, Tomota Kamida, Funa Arai, Shinichi Iwasaki
{"title":"Impact of medications on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.","authors":"Kiyoshi Minohara, Takuma Matoba, Michi Sawabe, Daisuke Kawakita, Gaku Takano, Keisuke Oguri, Akihiro Murashima, Sho Iwaki, Hiroshi Tsuge, Sae Imaizumi, Koji Tsukamoto, Ayano Kondo, Keiichiro Shingaki, Sekai Kikuchi, Tomota Kamida, Funa Arai, Shinichi Iwasaki","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02797-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (RM-HNC). However, variability in treatment response necessitates the exploration of predictive factors, including gut microbiota, which are influenced by antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and statins. This retrospective study assessed the effects of these medications on the clinical outcomes of ICI-treated patients with RM-HNC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 112 patients with RM-HNC who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy between 2017 and 2022 at Nagoya City University Hospital. The effects of medications on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Antibiotic administration within 60 days before ICI initiation was significantly associated with worse OS (median OS, 11.9 vs 20.5 months, p = 0.011) and PFS (median PFS, 3.0 vs 5.8 months, p = 0.018). Subgroup analyses indicated that tetracyclines were particularly detrimental. No significant differences in OS or PFS were observed with PPI or statin administration, and no significant associations of ORR or DCR were detected with antibiotic, PPI, or statin administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antibiotic administration was associated with worse survival in patients with RM-HNC receiving ICIs. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of antibiotic administration in patients undergoing ICI therapy and highlight the importance of further research to optimize treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1572-1581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02797-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (RM-HNC). However, variability in treatment response necessitates the exploration of predictive factors, including gut microbiota, which are influenced by antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and statins. This retrospective study assessed the effects of these medications on the clinical outcomes of ICI-treated patients with RM-HNC.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 112 patients with RM-HNC who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy between 2017 and 2022 at Nagoya City University Hospital. The effects of medications on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: Antibiotic administration within 60 days before ICI initiation was significantly associated with worse OS (median OS, 11.9 vs 20.5 months, p = 0.011) and PFS (median PFS, 3.0 vs 5.8 months, p = 0.018). Subgroup analyses indicated that tetracyclines were particularly detrimental. No significant differences in OS or PFS were observed with PPI or statin administration, and no significant associations of ORR or DCR were detected with antibiotic, PPI, or statin administration.

Conclusion: Antibiotic administration was associated with worse survival in patients with RM-HNC receiving ICIs. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration of antibiotic administration in patients undergoing ICI therapy and highlight the importance of further research to optimize treatment strategies.

药物对复发或转移性头颈癌患者免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)是复发或转移性头颈癌(RM-HNC)的标准治疗方法。然而,治疗反应的可变性需要探索预测因素,包括受抗生素、质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)和他汀类药物影响的肠道微生物群。本回顾性研究评估了这些药物对ci治疗的RM-HNC患者临床结果的影响。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2017年至2022年在名古屋城市大学医院接受纳武单抗或派姆单抗单药治疗的112例RM-HNC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型评估药物对总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)的影响。结果:ICI开始前60天内给予抗生素与较差的OS(中位OS, 11.9 vs 20.5个月,p = 0.011)和PFS(中位PFS, 3.0 vs 5.8个月,p = 0.018)显著相关。亚组分析表明,四环素尤其有害。使用PPI或他汀类药物未观察到OS或PFS的显著差异,抗生素、PPI或他汀类药物未检测到ORR或DCR的显著相关性。结论:抗生素给药与接受ICIs治疗的RM-HNC患者较差的生存率相关。这些发现强调了在接受ICI治疗的患者中需要仔细考虑抗生素的使用,并强调了进一步研究以优化治疗策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信