Influenza Vaccination and Occupational Social Intensity: Evidence From U.S. Workers

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1002/hec.4974
Yancheng Xiao, Matthew Harris, Alissa O'Halloran, Jamison Pike
{"title":"Influenza Vaccination and Occupational Social Intensity: Evidence From U.S. Workers","authors":"Yancheng Xiao,&nbsp;Matthew Harris,&nbsp;Alissa O'Halloran,&nbsp;Jamison Pike","doi":"10.1002/hec.4974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We examine whether individuals with socially intensive occupations are empirically more likely to get vaccinated against flu. Socially active workers interact with a relatively large number of people and are therefore more likely to catch and spread infectious diseases. Vaccinating these workers against infectious disease therefore yields greater marginal social benefits than the average person. We construct multiple measures of social intensity from the Occupational Information Network. We find that workers in occupations with high social intensity are not significantly more likely to receive a flu shot. These results add to earlier findings that individuals' vaccination decisions are driven mainly by private valuations rather than social considerations. However, we provide the first direct evidence that individuals for whom vaccination would yield the greatest external benefits are not more likely to get vaccinated.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 9","pages":"1614-1647"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine whether individuals with socially intensive occupations are empirically more likely to get vaccinated against flu. Socially active workers interact with a relatively large number of people and are therefore more likely to catch and spread infectious diseases. Vaccinating these workers against infectious disease therefore yields greater marginal social benefits than the average person. We construct multiple measures of social intensity from the Occupational Information Network. We find that workers in occupations with high social intensity are not significantly more likely to receive a flu shot. These results add to earlier findings that individuals' vaccination decisions are driven mainly by private valuations rather than social considerations. However, we provide the first direct evidence that individuals for whom vaccination would yield the greatest external benefits are not more likely to get vaccinated.

流感疫苗接种和职业社会强度:来自美国工人的证据。
我们考察了社会密集型职业的个体是否更有可能接种流感疫苗。社会活跃的工作者与相对较多的人打交道,因此更容易感染和传播传染病。因此,给这些工人接种预防传染病的疫苗比普通人产生更大的边际社会效益。我们从职业信息网络构建了社会强度的多重度量。我们发现,从事高社交强度职业的工人接种流感疫苗的可能性并没有显著增加。这些结果进一步证实了先前的发现,即个人的疫苗接种决定主要是由个人估值而不是社会考虑驱动的。然而,我们提供了第一个直接证据,证明接种疫苗会产生最大外部效益的个人并不更有可能接种疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信