Risk Factors for Pelvic Non-responders Even after Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis Overcorrection and Their Impact on Surgical Outcomes.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Se-Jun Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Chong-Suh Lee, Jin-Sung Park
{"title":"Risk Factors for Pelvic Non-responders Even after Pelvic Incidence-Lumbar Lordosis Overcorrection and Their Impact on Surgical Outcomes.","authors":"Se-Jun Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Minwook Kang, Kyunghun Jung, Chong-Suh Lee, Jin-Sung Park","doi":"10.1177/21925682251347909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective observation study.ObjectivesDespite pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) overcorrection, some patients exhibit residual pelvic tilt (PT) malalignment, termed pelvic non-responders (PNRs). We aimed to identify risk factors for PNRS after PI-LL overcorrection and its impact on surgical outcomes.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 181 adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who underwent fusion of ≥ five levels. PNRs were defined as postoperative PT ≥ 20° despite PI-LL overcorrection. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and mechanical complications, such as proximal junctional failure (PJF), were documented. Logistic regression identified significant risk factors for PNRs.ResultsAmong the 181 patients, 30 (16.6%) were classified as having PNRs. Preoperative PI and postoperative PI-LL mismatch were significantly higher in PNRs than in PRs. Multivariate analysis identified higher preoperative PI, postoperative PI-LL ≥ -2°, lordosis distribution index (LDI) < 53%, and increased postoperative thoracic kyphosis as significant risk factors for pelvic non-response. PJF was significantly higher in PNRs (30.0% vs 10.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). At 1 year postoperatively, PNRs had lower SRS-22 scores in activity, pain, appearance, and mental health (<i>P</i> < 0.05), but MCID analysis indicated these differences may not be clinically meaningful.ConclusionsLarger preoperative PI, lower postoperative LDI, and higher postoperative PI-LL are significant risk factors for pelvic non-response in ASD patients with PI-LL overcorrection. PNRs are at increased risk of higher rates of PJF. Surgical strategies should prioritize achieving the target PI-LL and an LDI of ≥53% to optimize alignment and reduce the risk of PNRs and associated mechanical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251347909"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12133791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251347909","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective observation study.ObjectivesDespite pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) overcorrection, some patients exhibit residual pelvic tilt (PT) malalignment, termed pelvic non-responders (PNRs). We aimed to identify risk factors for PNRS after PI-LL overcorrection and its impact on surgical outcomes.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 181 adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients who underwent fusion of ≥ five levels. PNRs were defined as postoperative PT ≥ 20° despite PI-LL overcorrection. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and mechanical complications, such as proximal junctional failure (PJF), were documented. Logistic regression identified significant risk factors for PNRs.ResultsAmong the 181 patients, 30 (16.6%) were classified as having PNRs. Preoperative PI and postoperative PI-LL mismatch were significantly higher in PNRs than in PRs. Multivariate analysis identified higher preoperative PI, postoperative PI-LL ≥ -2°, lordosis distribution index (LDI) < 53%, and increased postoperative thoracic kyphosis as significant risk factors for pelvic non-response. PJF was significantly higher in PNRs (30.0% vs 10.6%, P < 0.01). At 1 year postoperatively, PNRs had lower SRS-22 scores in activity, pain, appearance, and mental health (P < 0.05), but MCID analysis indicated these differences may not be clinically meaningful.ConclusionsLarger preoperative PI, lower postoperative LDI, and higher postoperative PI-LL are significant risk factors for pelvic non-response in ASD patients with PI-LL overcorrection. PNRs are at increased risk of higher rates of PJF. Surgical strategies should prioritize achieving the target PI-LL and an LDI of ≥53% to optimize alignment and reduce the risk of PNRs and associated mechanical complications.

骨盆无反应的危险因素,即使在骨盆发病率-腰椎前凸过度矫正后及其对手术结果的影响。
研究设计回顾性观察研究。尽管骨盆发生率(PI)-腰椎前凸(LL)矫正过度,但一些患者仍表现出残留的骨盆倾斜(PT)错位,称为骨盆无反应(pnr)。我们的目的是确定PI-LL过度矫正后PNRS的危险因素及其对手术结果的影响。方法回顾性分析181例接受≥5节段融合术的成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者。pnr定义为术后PT≥20°,尽管PI-LL过矫。记录了患者报告的结果(PROMs)和机械并发症,如近端连接功能衰竭(PJF)。逻辑回归确定了pnr的显著危险因素。结果181例患者中,30例(16.6%)为pnr。术前PI和术后PI- ll不匹配的pnr患者明显高于pr患者。多因素分析发现术前PI较高,术后PI- ll≥-2°,前凸分布指数(LDI) < 53%,术后胸后凸增加是骨盆无反应的重要危险因素。PNRs组PJF显著增高(30.0% vs 10.6%, P < 0.01)。术后1年,pnr患者在活动、疼痛、外观和心理健康方面的SRS-22评分较低(P < 0.05),但MCID分析显示这些差异可能没有临床意义。结论术前PI较大,术后LDI较低,术后PI- ll较高是PI- ll过矫ASD患者盆腔无反应的重要危险因素。pnr患PJF的风险更高。手术策略应优先考虑实现PI-LL和LDI≥53%的目标,以优化对齐并降低pnr和相关机械并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信