Effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimize prescribing in general practice: a systematic review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Caroline McCarthy, Patrick Moynagh, Áine Mannion, Ashely Wei, Barbara Clyne, Frank Moriarty
{"title":"Effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimize prescribing in general practice: a systematic review.","authors":"Caroline McCarthy, Patrick Moynagh, Áine Mannion, Ashely Wei, Barbara Clyne, Frank Moriarty","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organisation's Medication Without Harm campaign aims to reduce severe avoidable medication-related harm by 50%. This systematic review explored the characteristics of interventions that provide visual and longitudinal feedback on prescribing (interactive dashboards), in general practice and the effect of these interventions on prescribing-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was registered prospectively and reported in line with PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases and grey literature were searched in November 2023 to identify interventional studies that explored the effect of interactive dashboards on prescribing-related outcomes in general practice. Two independent researchers conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Interventions were described narratively, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed for comparable studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten randomized controlled trials, one controlled before-and-after study, and three interrupted time series were included. Seven studies reported a significant positive effect on prescribing-related outcomes, with an effect seen more often for studies focussing on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) (four out of six). Three of the eight studies that focussed on antibiotic prescribing demonstrated a significant effect. A meta-analysis of three RCTs involving 160 general practices and 198 135 patients demonstrated the overall odds of PIP was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.78-1.06, I2 = 70.1%) in the intervention compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interactive dashboards show promise for supporting safe and effective prescribing in general practice, but current evidence is inconclusive. Future research should focus on developing core outcome sets to facilitate future meta-analyses of effectiveness as well as optimizing their implementation and understanding how to sustain user engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12134530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organisation's Medication Without Harm campaign aims to reduce severe avoidable medication-related harm by 50%. This systematic review explored the characteristics of interventions that provide visual and longitudinal feedback on prescribing (interactive dashboards), in general practice and the effect of these interventions on prescribing-related outcomes.

Methods: This systematic review was registered prospectively and reported in line with PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases and grey literature were searched in November 2023 to identify interventional studies that explored the effect of interactive dashboards on prescribing-related outcomes in general practice. Two independent researchers conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Interventions were described narratively, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed for comparable studies.

Results: Ten randomized controlled trials, one controlled before-and-after study, and three interrupted time series were included. Seven studies reported a significant positive effect on prescribing-related outcomes, with an effect seen more often for studies focussing on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) (four out of six). Three of the eight studies that focussed on antibiotic prescribing demonstrated a significant effect. A meta-analysis of three RCTs involving 160 general practices and 198 135 patients demonstrated the overall odds of PIP was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.78-1.06, I2 = 70.1%) in the intervention compared to the control group.

Conclusion: Interactive dashboards show promise for supporting safe and effective prescribing in general practice, but current evidence is inconclusive. Future research should focus on developing core outcome sets to facilitate future meta-analyses of effectiveness as well as optimizing their implementation and understanding how to sustain user engagement.

交互式仪表板优化处方在一般实践中的有效性:系统回顾。
背景:世界卫生组织的“无伤害用药”运动旨在将可避免的严重药物相关伤害减少50%。本系统综述探讨了在一般实践中提供处方视觉和纵向反馈(交互式仪表板)的干预措施的特点,以及这些干预措施对处方相关结果的影响。方法:本系统综述采用前瞻性注册,并按照PRISMA指南进行报道。我们于2023年11月检索了多个数据库和灰色文献,以确定探讨交互式仪表板对全科实践中处方相关结果影响的干预性研究。两名独立研究人员进行了筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。对干预措施进行叙述,并对可比研究进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果:纳入10项随机对照试验、1项前后对照研究和3项中断时间序列。七项研究报告了对处方相关结果的显著积极影响,对潜在不适当处方(PIP)的研究(六项研究中有四项)的影响更为常见。八项关于抗生素处方的研究中有三项显示了显著的效果。一项涉及160名全科医生和198 135名患者的三项随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示,与对照组相比,干预组PIP的总几率为0.92 (95%CI: 0.78-1.06, I2 = 70.1%)。结论:交互式仪表板有望在一般实践中支持安全有效的处方,但目前的证据尚无定论。未来的研究应侧重于开发核心结果集,以促进未来的有效性元分析,以及优化其实施和了解如何维持用户参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信