Comparative disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with combined therapy versus monotherapy of abiraterone and olaparib for prostate cancer: a pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Si-Han Zhang, Jin-Zhou Xu, Na Zeng, Zhi-Yu Xia, Lin-Tao Miao, Ci Zhang, Shao-Gang Wang, Qi-Dong Xia
{"title":"Comparative disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with combined therapy versus monotherapy of abiraterone and olaparib for prostate cancer: a pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database.","authors":"Si-Han Zhang, Jin-Zhou Xu, Na Zeng, Zhi-Yu Xia, Lin-Tao Miao, Ci Zhang, Shao-Gang Wang, Qi-Dong Xia","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2496434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compares adverse events (AEs) of combined abiraterone acetate and olaparib treatment with their individual treatments for prostate cancer, focusing on safety profile differences and their clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on AEs for abiraterone acetate and olaparib were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between April 2011 and April 2024. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was mainly utilized to analyze AEs and their preferred terms (PTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32,745 AE reports for abiraterone acetate, 2493 for olaparib and 113 for combination therapy in males were identified. The combination therapy was associated with a higher risk of hematologic and lymphatic disorders and cardiovascular events compared to monotherapy. Notably, venous embolism and acute myocardial infarction showed significant ROR values in the combination therapy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining abiraterone and olaparib increases risks of acute myocardial infarction, embolism, and pneumonitis over monotherapy. Though this combination improves survival, it demands vigilant patient monitoring and risk assessment. We recommend patients undergo serum lipid measurement, electrocardiograms, and cardiac and vascular ultrasounds to facilitate early detection and management of potential adverse effects. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and ensure the safe application of this drug combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2496434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study compares adverse events (AEs) of combined abiraterone acetate and olaparib treatment with their individual treatments for prostate cancer, focusing on safety profile differences and their clinical implications.

Methods: Data on AEs for abiraterone acetate and olaparib were extracted from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between April 2011 and April 2024. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was mainly utilized to analyze AEs and their preferred terms (PTs).

Results: A total of 32,745 AE reports for abiraterone acetate, 2493 for olaparib and 113 for combination therapy in males were identified. The combination therapy was associated with a higher risk of hematologic and lymphatic disorders and cardiovascular events compared to monotherapy. Notably, venous embolism and acute myocardial infarction showed significant ROR values in the combination therapy group.

Conclusions: Combining abiraterone and olaparib increases risks of acute myocardial infarction, embolism, and pneumonitis over monotherapy. Though this combination improves survival, it demands vigilant patient monitoring and risk assessment. We recommend patients undergo serum lipid measurement, electrocardiograms, and cardiac and vascular ultrasounds to facilitate early detection and management of potential adverse effects. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and ensure the safe application of this drug combination.

阿比特龙和奥拉帕尼联合治疗与单药治疗前列腺癌相关不良事件的比较歧化分析:使用FAERS数据库的药物警戒研究。
目的:本研究比较醋酸阿比特龙和奥拉帕尼联合治疗与单独治疗前列腺癌的不良事件(ae),重点关注安全性差异及其临床意义。方法:从2011年4月至2024年4月FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中提取醋酸阿比特龙和奥拉帕尼不良事件报告数据。报告优势比(ROR)主要用于分析ae及其首选术语(PTs)。结果:男性患者醋酸阿比特龙、奥拉帕尼和联合用药的AE报告分别为32,745份、2493份和113份。与单药治疗相比,联合治疗与血液学和淋巴疾病以及心血管事件的高风险相关。值得注意的是,静脉栓塞和急性心肌梗死在联合治疗组有显著的ROR值。结论:阿比特龙和奥拉帕尼联合治疗比单药治疗增加急性心肌梗死、栓塞和肺炎的风险。虽然这种组合提高了生存率,但它需要警惕的患者监测和风险评估。我们建议患者进行血脂测量、心电图、心脏和血管超声检查,以促进早期发现和处理潜在的不良反应。需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果并确保这种药物组合的安全应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信