Interventions to improve diabetes care and self-management for individuals experiencing homelessness: a scoping review with systematic search of qualitative and quantitative literature.

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Nada A El Tobgy, Eshleen K Grewal, Pablo M Gonzalez, Tadios Tibebu, Gillian L Booth, Kerry A McBrien, Stephen W Hwang, Carolyn Ziegler, David J T Campbell
{"title":"Interventions to improve diabetes care and self-management for individuals experiencing homelessness: a scoping review with systematic search of qualitative and quantitative literature.","authors":"Nada A El Tobgy, Eshleen K Grewal, Pablo M Gonzalez, Tadios Tibebu, Gillian L Booth, Kerry A McBrien, Stephen W Hwang, Carolyn Ziegler, David J T Campbell","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06449-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/hypothesis: </strong>Optimal diabetes management for people experiencing homelessness can be a challenge. Our aim was to summarise the existing literature on, highlight emerging evidence for and identify gaps in diabetes care for people experiencing homelessness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a comprehensive and systematic search of 11 databases of published academic literature up to 24 September 2024. Only English and French studies were included. We used defined search and selection criteria to identify interventions or recommendations targeted towards diabetes care in people experiencing homelessness. We also conducted an extensive grey-literature search. Articles were screened at the abstract and full-text stages by two reviewers. We conducted descriptive analysis of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2367 records were identified in the initial search of the published literature (1182 after de-duplication), of which 75 met the criteria for inclusion. In addition, 194 records from the grey-literature sources met the criteria for inclusion, yielding a total of 269 documents included in the review. Most interventions were conducted in the USA (n=186) and were simple programme descriptions (n=173). Sixteen intervention categories were identified; the most common included mobile clinics, street medicine and outreach (n=68), multidisciplinary care (n=35), recommendations for providers (n=29) and foot care/assessment programmes (n=31). Of the 51 quantitative studies, 11 examined the effects of an intervention on HbA<sub>1c</sub>, with seven showing reductions in HbA<sub>1c</sub>, although these observations were statistically significant in only three studies. Risk of bias assessment of the quantitative studies revealed an overall high risk of bias, mainly secondary to attrition. Fifteen qualitative studies emphasised the need for specialised diabetes care for people experiencing homelessness, including the use of multidisciplinary teams to provide diabetes care and longer appointment times with health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/interpretation: </strong>A broad spectrum of interventions have been implemented with the goal of improving diabetes care in people experiencing homelessness. There is an ongoing need for more structured evaluations of programmes that provide care for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06449-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Optimal diabetes management for people experiencing homelessness can be a challenge. Our aim was to summarise the existing literature on, highlight emerging evidence for and identify gaps in diabetes care for people experiencing homelessness.

Methods: We undertook a comprehensive and systematic search of 11 databases of published academic literature up to 24 September 2024. Only English and French studies were included. We used defined search and selection criteria to identify interventions or recommendations targeted towards diabetes care in people experiencing homelessness. We also conducted an extensive grey-literature search. Articles were screened at the abstract and full-text stages by two reviewers. We conducted descriptive analysis of the included studies.

Results: In total, 2367 records were identified in the initial search of the published literature (1182 after de-duplication), of which 75 met the criteria for inclusion. In addition, 194 records from the grey-literature sources met the criteria for inclusion, yielding a total of 269 documents included in the review. Most interventions were conducted in the USA (n=186) and were simple programme descriptions (n=173). Sixteen intervention categories were identified; the most common included mobile clinics, street medicine and outreach (n=68), multidisciplinary care (n=35), recommendations for providers (n=29) and foot care/assessment programmes (n=31). Of the 51 quantitative studies, 11 examined the effects of an intervention on HbA1c, with seven showing reductions in HbA1c, although these observations were statistically significant in only three studies. Risk of bias assessment of the quantitative studies revealed an overall high risk of bias, mainly secondary to attrition. Fifteen qualitative studies emphasised the need for specialised diabetes care for people experiencing homelessness, including the use of multidisciplinary teams to provide diabetes care and longer appointment times with health professionals.

Conclusions/interpretation: A broad spectrum of interventions have been implemented with the goal of improving diabetes care in people experiencing homelessness. There is an ongoing need for more structured evaluations of programmes that provide care for this population.

改善无家可归者糖尿病护理和自我管理的干预措施:定性和定量文献系统检索的范围审查。
目的/假设:对无家可归者进行最佳糖尿病管理可能是一项挑战。我们的目的是总结现有文献,突出新出现的证据,并确定无家可归者糖尿病护理方面的差距。方法:对截至2024年9月24日的11个数据库的已发表学术文献进行全面系统的检索。只包括英语和法语研究。我们使用定义的搜索和选择标准来确定针对无家可归者糖尿病护理的干预措施或建议。我们还进行了广泛的灰色文献检索。文章由两位审稿人在摘要和全文阶段进行筛选。我们对纳入的研究进行描述性分析。结果:初步检索到已发表文献2367条(重复删除后1182条),其中75条符合纳入标准。此外,来自灰色文献来源的194份记录符合纳入标准,共产生269份文件纳入审查。大多数干预是在美国进行的(n=186),并且是简单的方案描述(n=173)。确定了16个干预类别;最常见的包括流动诊所、街头医疗和外展(n=68)、多学科护理(n=35)、提供者推荐(n=29)和足部护理/评估方案(n=31)。在51项定量研究中,11项研究检查了干预对HbA1c的影响,其中7项显示HbA1c降低,尽管这些观察结果在只有3项研究中具有统计学意义。定量研究的偏倚风险评估显示总体偏倚风险较高,主要是由于人员流失。15项定性研究强调需要为无家可归者提供专门的糖尿病护理,包括利用多学科小组提供糖尿病护理和延长与保健专业人员的预约时间。结论/解释:已经实施了广泛的干预措施,目的是改善无家可归者的糖尿病护理。目前需要对为这一人口提供护理的方案进行更有组织的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetologia
Diabetologia 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
193
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Diabetologia, the authoritative journal dedicated to diabetes research, holds high visibility through society membership, libraries, and social media. As the official journal of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, it is ranked in the top quartile of the 2019 JCR Impact Factors in the Endocrinology & Metabolism category. The journal boasts dedicated and expert editorial teams committed to supporting authors throughout the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信