A comparison of current methods to measure antibodies in type 1 diabetes.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Maria Infantino, Mariangela Manfredi, Emirena Garrafa, Silvia Pancani, Anastasia Lechiara, Emanuela Maria Mobilia, Valentina Grossi, Barbara Lari, Nicola Bizzaro, Giampaola Pesce
{"title":"A comparison of current methods to measure antibodies in type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Maria Infantino, Mariangela Manfredi, Emirena Garrafa, Silvia Pancani, Anastasia Lechiara, Emanuela Maria Mobilia, Valentina Grossi, Barbara Lari, Nicola Bizzaro, Giampaola Pesce","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease causing β-cell destruction, hyperglycemia, and lifelong insulin dependence that can lead to severe complications like ketoacidosis, with a 1 % mortality rate in newly diagnosed patients. A significant breakthrough in T1D research was the identification of a long presymptomatic phase, characterized by disease-specific autoantibodies despite the absence of clinical symptoms. The aim of our study was to compare the results of different commercial assays for detecting anti-GAD, -IA-2, -ZnT8 antibodies and IAA to evaluate the state of the art of the current methods in a routine clinical laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have analyzed 87 consecutive samples from patients screened for T1D and evaluated the agreement among four commercial assays (two chemiluminescence immunoassays and two immunoenzymatic assays) for detecting anti-GAD, -IA-2, -ZnT8 antibodies and IAA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement among methods for all disease-specific antibodies measured by Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.514 to 1.000. The highest agreement was found for anti-GAD antibodies (0.923-0.963) and the lowest agreement for IAA (0.514-0.550). The average agreement was 0.796 (SD: 0.170) and it was statistically significant at p<0.001 for all comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even though some differences exist among methods, our findings provide valuable insights into the use of new technologies for T1D diagnosis, demonstrating an overall consistent agreement among assays tested for all antibodies but IAA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic autoimmune disease causing β-cell destruction, hyperglycemia, and lifelong insulin dependence that can lead to severe complications like ketoacidosis, with a 1 % mortality rate in newly diagnosed patients. A significant breakthrough in T1D research was the identification of a long presymptomatic phase, characterized by disease-specific autoantibodies despite the absence of clinical symptoms. The aim of our study was to compare the results of different commercial assays for detecting anti-GAD, -IA-2, -ZnT8 antibodies and IAA to evaluate the state of the art of the current methods in a routine clinical laboratory setting.

Methods: We have analyzed 87 consecutive samples from patients screened for T1D and evaluated the agreement among four commercial assays (two chemiluminescence immunoassays and two immunoenzymatic assays) for detecting anti-GAD, -IA-2, -ZnT8 antibodies and IAA.

Results: The agreement among methods for all disease-specific antibodies measured by Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.514 to 1.000. The highest agreement was found for anti-GAD antibodies (0.923-0.963) and the lowest agreement for IAA (0.514-0.550). The average agreement was 0.796 (SD: 0.170) and it was statistically significant at p<0.001 for all comparisons.

Conclusions: Even though some differences exist among methods, our findings provide valuable insights into the use of new technologies for T1D diagnosis, demonstrating an overall consistent agreement among assays tested for all antibodies but IAA.

目前测量1型糖尿病抗体方法的比较。
目的:1型糖尿病(T1D)是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,可导致β细胞破坏、高血糖和终生胰岛素依赖,可导致严重的并发症,如酮症酸中毒,新诊断患者的死亡率为1% %。T1D研究的一个重大突破是确定了一个长时间的症状前阶段,尽管没有临床症状,但以疾病特异性自身抗体为特征。本研究的目的是比较不同商业检测抗gad、-IA-2、-ZnT8抗体和IAA的结果,以评估常规临床实验室环境中当前方法的最新水平。方法:我们分析了87例连续筛查T1D患者的样本,并评估了四种商业检测方法(两种化学发光免疫测定法和两种免疫酶测定法)检测抗gad、-IA-2、-ZnT8抗体和IAA的一致性。结果:Cohen’s kappa法测定的所有疾病特异性抗体的一致性在0.514 ~ 1.000之间。抗gad抗体的一致性最高(0.923 ~ 0.963),IAA的一致性最低(0.514 ~ 0.550)。结论:尽管方法之间存在一些差异,但我们的研究结果为T1D诊断新技术的使用提供了有价值的见解,证明了除IAA外所有抗体检测方法之间的总体一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信