Efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen in preventing hypoxia during Gastrointestinal endoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Fengli Liu, Chaojin Zhang, Xiaoqiang Wang, Bo Qi, Li Zheng, Yanhua Zhao, Weifeng Yu
{"title":"Efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen in preventing hypoxia during Gastrointestinal endoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Fengli Liu, Chaojin Zhang, Xiaoqiang Wang, Bo Qi, Li Zheng, Yanhua Zhao, Weifeng Yu","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03155-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypoxia is a common complication, particularly in gastrointestinal endoscopy due to respiratory depression induced by intravenous anesthesia with the use of propofol. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal oxygen in preventing hypoxia during gastrointestinal endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 900 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy at Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, from June 15th 2023 to August 15th 2023. Patients were categorized into the high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) group using a high-flow-specific nasal cannula or the standard nasal oxygen (SNO) group using a standard nasal cannula. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of hypoxia (mild hypoxia: 75% ≤ SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90% for < 60 s, severe hypoxia: SpO<sub>2</sub> < 75% or 75% ≤ SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90% for > 60 s). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of subclinical respiratory depression (90% ≤ SpO<sub>2</sub> < 95%) and adverse events associated with the nasal cannula. We used the propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio to balance the patient baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>884 patients were included in the analysis after PSM. The general characteristics of patients had no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The HFNO group demonstrated significantly better outcomes compared with SNO, including the lower incidence of hypoxia (0% vs. 5.66%, p < 0.001) and subclinical respiratory depression (1.36% vs. 12.67%, p < 0.001), and fewer adverse events associated with the nasal cannula (0% vs. 4.07%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a multifactorial analysis identified body mass index (BMI) (HR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.17-1.76], p < 0.001) and sedation depth (HR = 10.31, 95% CI [3.68-28.88], p < 0.001) as risk factors for hypoxia in the SNO group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HFNO emerges as a promising approach for preventing hypoxia during gastrointestinal endoscopy, offering a simple, effective, and non-invasive means of respiratory support.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12131433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03155-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypoxia is a common complication, particularly in gastrointestinal endoscopy due to respiratory depression induced by intravenous anesthesia with the use of propofol. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal oxygen in preventing hypoxia during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 900 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy at Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, from June 15th 2023 to August 15th 2023. Patients were categorized into the high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) group using a high-flow-specific nasal cannula or the standard nasal oxygen (SNO) group using a standard nasal cannula. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of hypoxia (mild hypoxia: 75% ≤ SpO2 < 90% for < 60 s, severe hypoxia: SpO2 < 75% or 75% ≤ SpO2 < 90% for > 60 s). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of subclinical respiratory depression (90% ≤ SpO2 < 95%) and adverse events associated with the nasal cannula. We used the propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio to balance the patient baseline characteristics.

Results: 884 patients were included in the analysis after PSM. The general characteristics of patients had no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The HFNO group demonstrated significantly better outcomes compared with SNO, including the lower incidence of hypoxia (0% vs. 5.66%, p < 0.001) and subclinical respiratory depression (1.36% vs. 12.67%, p < 0.001), and fewer adverse events associated with the nasal cannula (0% vs. 4.07%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a multifactorial analysis identified body mass index (BMI) (HR = 1.43, 95% CI [1.17-1.76], p < 0.001) and sedation depth (HR = 10.31, 95% CI [3.68-28.88], p < 0.001) as risk factors for hypoxia in the SNO group.

Conclusion: HFNO emerges as a promising approach for preventing hypoxia during gastrointestinal endoscopy, offering a simple, effective, and non-invasive means of respiratory support.

高流量鼻吸氧在胃肠内镜检查中预防缺氧的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:缺氧是一种常见的并发症,特别是在胃肠内镜检查中,由于异丙酚静脉麻醉引起的呼吸抑制。本研究旨在探讨高流量鼻吸氧预防胃肠内镜检查时缺氧的有效性和安全性。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究,于2023年6月15日至2023年8月15日在上海交通大学医学院仁济医院接受胃肠内镜检查的900例患者。将患者分为使用高流量专用鼻插管的高流量鼻吸氧组(HFNO)和使用标准鼻插管的标准鼻吸氧组(SNO)。本研究的主要终点是缺氧发生率(轻度缺氧:75%≤SpO2 2 60 s)。次要结局包括亚临床呼吸抑制发生率(90%≤SpO2)。结果:884例PSM患者纳入分析。两组患者一般特征比较,差异无统计学意义。与SNO相比,HFNO组表现出明显更好的结果,包括低缺氧发生率(0% vs. 5.66%)。结论:HFNO是一种很有希望的方法,可以预防胃肠道内窥镜检查期间的缺氧,提供了一种简单、有效、无创的呼吸支持手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信