Enhancing emergency department triage for older patients: a prospective study on the integration of the identification of seniors at risk.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Lanxin Ouyang, Shuzhen Yu, Ziwei Hu, Yin Lin, Di Liu
{"title":"Enhancing emergency department triage for older patients: a prospective study on the integration of the identification of seniors at risk.","authors":"Lanxin Ouyang, Shuzhen Yu, Ziwei Hu, Yin Lin, Di Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01253-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults are a growing demographic in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide, yet traditional triage systems often fail to account for their unique risks, leading to under-triage and adverse outcomes. The Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool offers a pragmatic approach to enhance risk stratification, but its integration into ED triage systems remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective single-center observational cohort study assessed older patients (≥ 65 years) using both the standard ED triage system and the ISAR scale. After a 30-day follow-up, triage levels were retrospectively adjusted upward by one level for patients with ISAR scores ≥ 2. The predictive accuracy of the revised triage system was compared to the original system using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 973 patients completing follow-up, 38.1% had an ISAR score ≥ 2. Older patients (≥ 75 years) were more likely to be classified as high risk and had significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes, including ICU admission and 30-day mortality. The revised triage system slightly improved discriminative ability in patients aged ≥ 65 years (AUC 0.697 to 0.714), with stable performance maintained in those aged ≥ 75 years (AUC 0.703). Sensitivity declined slightly, while specificity improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating ISAR into ED triage modestly enhanced the identification of older patients at risk for short-term adverse outcomes, particularly among those aged ≥ 65 years. These findings support the value of incorporating geriatric screening into routine triage to enable more tailored risk stratification. Further studies are needed to evaluate implementation feasibility across different healthcare settings and to inform integration into routine practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12135277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01253-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults are a growing demographic in emergency departments (EDs) worldwide, yet traditional triage systems often fail to account for their unique risks, leading to under-triage and adverse outcomes. The Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) tool offers a pragmatic approach to enhance risk stratification, but its integration into ED triage systems remains underexplored.

Methods: This prospective single-center observational cohort study assessed older patients (≥ 65 years) using both the standard ED triage system and the ISAR scale. After a 30-day follow-up, triage levels were retrospectively adjusted upward by one level for patients with ISAR scores ≥ 2. The predictive accuracy of the revised triage system was compared to the original system using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: Among 973 patients completing follow-up, 38.1% had an ISAR score ≥ 2. Older patients (≥ 75 years) were more likely to be classified as high risk and had significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes, including ICU admission and 30-day mortality. The revised triage system slightly improved discriminative ability in patients aged ≥ 65 years (AUC 0.697 to 0.714), with stable performance maintained in those aged ≥ 75 years (AUC 0.703). Sensitivity declined slightly, while specificity improved.

Conclusion: Integrating ISAR into ED triage modestly enhanced the identification of older patients at risk for short-term adverse outcomes, particularly among those aged ≥ 65 years. These findings support the value of incorporating geriatric screening into routine triage to enable more tailored risk stratification. Further studies are needed to evaluate implementation feasibility across different healthcare settings and to inform integration into routine practice.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

加强急诊科对老年患者的分诊:一项整合危险老年人识别的前瞻性研究。
背景:世界范围内急诊科(ed)的老年人人数不断增加,但传统的分诊系统往往不能考虑到他们独特的风险,导致分诊不足和不良后果。风险老年人识别(ISAR)工具提供了一种实用的方法来加强风险分层,但其与急诊科分诊系统的整合仍有待探索。方法:本前瞻性单中心观察队列研究采用标准ED分诊系统和ISAR量表对老年患者(≥65岁)进行评估。在30天的随访后,ISAR评分≥2的患者的分类水平回顾性上调一级。采用logistic回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,比较修订后分诊系统与原系统的预测准确性。结果:973例完成随访的患者中,38.1%的患者ISAR评分≥2。老年患者(≥75岁)更有可能被归为高风险,不良结局发生率明显更高,包括ICU入院率和30天死亡率。改进后的分诊系统对≥65岁患者的鉴别能力略有提高(AUC为0.697 ~ 0.714),对≥75岁患者的鉴别能力保持稳定(AUC为0.703)。敏感性略有下降,而特异性有所提高。结论:将ISAR纳入ED分诊可适度提高对有短期不良结局风险的老年患者的识别,尤其是年龄≥65岁的患者。这些发现支持将老年筛查纳入常规分类的价值,以实现更有针对性的风险分层。需要进一步的研究来评估在不同医疗环境中实施的可行性,并为整合到常规实践中提供信息。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信