Making the Invisible Visible: Exploring Joint Attention Behaviour in Remote Collaborative Problem-Solving

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Johanna Pöysä-Tarhonen, Shupin Li, Jarkko Hautala, Nafisa Awwal, Päivi Häkkinen
{"title":"Making the Invisible Visible: Exploring Joint Attention Behaviour in Remote Collaborative Problem-Solving","authors":"Johanna Pöysä-Tarhonen,&nbsp;Shupin Li,&nbsp;Jarkko Hautala,&nbsp;Nafisa Awwal,&nbsp;Päivi Häkkinen","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Collaborative problem-solving (CPS), encompassing social and cognitive domains, is recognised as a critical competency for current and future learners. While the cognitive domain, rooted in individual problem-solving, is relatively well understood, the social domain, manifested through social interaction, remains a challenge, especially in remote settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study explored the complex social domain of CPS through theoretical and empirical understanding of joint attention (JA) behaviour. JA was conceptualised as a continuum of attentional levels, from lower (monitoring and common) to higher levels (mutual and shared). While gaze alignment was considered foundational to JA, capturing higher attentional levels, crucial for productive CPS, required extending the focus to communication over the shared objects of attention—were they external (e.g., events) or internal (e.g., thoughts).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Dual eye-tracking data from 12 dyads (aged 12–13) engaged in remote CPS were first analysed for the strength of eye-gaze coupling, used as a proxy for lower JA levels and a potential indicator of higher levels. This was followed by qualitative analysis of interaction (logfiles, eye-event videos) in three dyads with strong eye-gaze coupling, to examine how these measures related to actualised JA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results highlighted the relevance of JA in understanding the social domain of CPS, even in remote settings. Informed by quantitative measures, the qualitative analysis revealed dyadic behaviour linked to higher JA levels. Overall, the findings provide preliminary insights into how JA relates to productive CPS, offering a groundwork for further research on supporting learners to “improve collectively”.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Collaborative problem-solving (CPS), encompassing social and cognitive domains, is recognised as a critical competency for current and future learners. While the cognitive domain, rooted in individual problem-solving, is relatively well understood, the social domain, manifested through social interaction, remains a challenge, especially in remote settings.

Objectives

This study explored the complex social domain of CPS through theoretical and empirical understanding of joint attention (JA) behaviour. JA was conceptualised as a continuum of attentional levels, from lower (monitoring and common) to higher levels (mutual and shared). While gaze alignment was considered foundational to JA, capturing higher attentional levels, crucial for productive CPS, required extending the focus to communication over the shared objects of attention—were they external (e.g., events) or internal (e.g., thoughts).

Methods

Dual eye-tracking data from 12 dyads (aged 12–13) engaged in remote CPS were first analysed for the strength of eye-gaze coupling, used as a proxy for lower JA levels and a potential indicator of higher levels. This was followed by qualitative analysis of interaction (logfiles, eye-event videos) in three dyads with strong eye-gaze coupling, to examine how these measures related to actualised JA.

Results and Conclusions

The results highlighted the relevance of JA in understanding the social domain of CPS, even in remote settings. Informed by quantitative measures, the qualitative analysis revealed dyadic behaviour linked to higher JA levels. Overall, the findings provide preliminary insights into how JA relates to productive CPS, offering a groundwork for further research on supporting learners to “improve collectively”.

使不可见可见:探索远程协作解决问题中的共同注意行为
协作解决问题(CPS),包括社会和认知领域,被认为是当前和未来学习者的关键能力。虽然以个人问题解决为基础的认知领域已经得到了较好的理解,但通过社会互动表现出来的社会领域仍然是一个挑战,特别是在偏远地区。目的通过对共同注意行为的理论和实证理解,探索CPS的复杂社会领域。JA被定义为一个连续的注意力水平,从较低的(监测和共同)到较高的水平(相互和共享)。虽然凝视对齐被认为是JA的基础,但捕捉更高的注意力水平,对高效CPS至关重要,需要将焦点扩展到共享注意力对象上的交流——它们是外部的(例如,事件)还是内部的(例如,思想)。方法对12对(12 - 13岁)参与远程CPS的双眼动追踪数据进行分析,分析眼-凝视耦合的强度,作为低JA水平的代表和高JA水平的潜在指标。接下来是对三个具有强烈眼-凝视耦合的二人组的交互(日志文件,眼-事件视频)进行定性分析,以检查这些措施与实际JA的关系。结果和结论结果强调了JA在理解CPS的社会领域中的相关性,即使在偏远地区也是如此。通过定量测量,定性分析揭示了与较高JA水平相关的二元行为。总的来说,这些发现为JA与生产性CPS的关系提供了初步的见解,为进一步研究支持学习者“集体提高”提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信