Pilot study comparison of developed and improved mass scale measurement capabilities

Q4 Engineering
Š. Ališić , A. Malengo , Z. Zelenka , J. Zůda , G. Popa , B. Mangutova-Stoilkovska , D. Pantić , M. Coenegrachts , M. Miteva , R. Hanrahan , I. Kolozinsky , A. Alić , A. Bolovan , T. Petkov
{"title":"Pilot study comparison of developed and improved mass scale measurement capabilities","authors":"Š. Ališić ,&nbsp;A. Malengo ,&nbsp;Z. Zelenka ,&nbsp;J. Zůda ,&nbsp;G. Popa ,&nbsp;B. Mangutova-Stoilkovska ,&nbsp;D. Pantić ,&nbsp;M. Coenegrachts ,&nbsp;M. Miteva ,&nbsp;R. Hanrahan ,&nbsp;I. Kolozinsky ,&nbsp;A. Alić ,&nbsp;A. Bolovan ,&nbsp;T. Petkov","doi":"10.1016/j.measen.2024.101354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of the Pilot Study was the calibration of sub-multiples of the kilogram, which was organised as a EURAMET Pilot Study in order to demonstrate a diagnostic comparison for the developed and improved Calibration Measurement Capability (CMC), while realising the mass scale of the participating National Measurement Institutes (NMIs). Due to the instability of some weights a simplified method was used to evaluate the results. It compares the laboratory result for each weight with the reference value obtained by the fitted weighted trendline, including the correlation due to the Consensus Value. It was the first time that the method of subdivision of a decade has been compared among laboratories by comparing the individual mass differences of the design matrix. The aim of improving capabilities and realising the mass scale with uncertainties of 1/3 mpe of the OIML Class E<sub>1</sub> tolerance was achieved by the participating NMIs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34311,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Sensors","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 101354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917424003301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of the Pilot Study was the calibration of sub-multiples of the kilogram, which was organised as a EURAMET Pilot Study in order to demonstrate a diagnostic comparison for the developed and improved Calibration Measurement Capability (CMC), while realising the mass scale of the participating National Measurement Institutes (NMIs). Due to the instability of some weights a simplified method was used to evaluate the results. It compares the laboratory result for each weight with the reference value obtained by the fitted weighted trendline, including the correlation due to the Consensus Value. It was the first time that the method of subdivision of a decade has been compared among laboratories by comparing the individual mass differences of the design matrix. The aim of improving capabilities and realising the mass scale with uncertainties of 1/3 mpe of the OIML Class E1 tolerance was achieved by the participating NMIs.
已开发和改进的大规模测量能力的试点研究比较
试点研究的目标是校准千克的子倍数,作为EURAMET试点研究组织,以展示开发和改进的校准测量能力(CMC)的诊断比较,同时实现参与的国家测量机构(nmi)的大规模规模。考虑到一些权重的不稳定性,采用了一种简化的方法来评价结果。它将每个权重的实验室结果与拟合的加权趋势线获得的参考值进行比较,包括共识值的相关性。这是十年来第一次通过比较设计矩阵的个体质量差异来比较实验室间的细分方法。通过参与的nmi实现了提高能力和实现不确定度为OIML E1级公差1/3 mpe的质量规模的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Measurement Sensors
Measurement Sensors Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信