Pulsed-field ablation beyond pulmonary vein for persistent atrial fibrillation: efficacy and impact on left atrial function.

IF 2.6
Wael Zaher, Lorenzo Marcon, Domenico G Della Rocca, Kathleen Thayse, Emmanuel Tran-Ngoc, Klaus-Richard Ebinger, Giampaolo Vetta, Luigi Pannone, Serge Boveda, Carlo de Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Antonio Sorgente
{"title":"Pulsed-field ablation beyond pulmonary vein for persistent atrial fibrillation: efficacy and impact on left atrial function.","authors":"Wael Zaher, Lorenzo Marcon, Domenico G Della Rocca, Kathleen Thayse, Emmanuel Tran-Ngoc, Klaus-Richard Ebinger, Giampaolo Vetta, Luigi Pannone, Serge Boveda, Carlo de Asmundis, Gian-Battista Chierchia, Antonio Sorgente","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02080-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, non-thermal energy for atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation that selectively targets cardiomyocytes with minimal to no risk of collateral damage. Among ablation strategies in persistent AF (PersAF), targeting sites other than the pulmonary veins (PVs) remains controversial, with concerns on improved success without increasing the risk of periprocedural complications and stiff left atrium (LA) syndrome. This study evaluates the impact of an ablation strategy beyond PVs using PFA on arrhythmia freedom and LA function in PersAF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 93 patients with PersAF undergoing first-time PFA targeting PVs and other extra-PV targets. AF-related symptoms, adverse events, electrocardiograms, and transthoracic echocardiograms were assessed at follow-up visits at 1, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Extra-PV targets included posterior wall (100%), anterior roof (50.5%), mitral isthmus (22.6%), anterior wall (36.6%), and right atrium applications (8.6%). No serious procedure-related adverse events were reported. At 1-year follow-up, 82.8% of patients were free from atrial arrhythmias. PFA significantly reduced A-wave velocity of mitral inflow and altered the E/A ratio but did not change LA compliance markers (e.g., LA strain reservoir and LA stiffness index (LASI)). LASI and left ventricular ejection fraction significantly improved from baseline in the PersAF > 3-month group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-year atrial arrhythmia freedom in PersAF patients after extensive PFA by means of a multielectrode catheter was high. Extra-PV ablation was safe, did not alter LA compliance but promoted a positive reverse remodeling with improved LA compliance and left ventricular systolic function.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02080-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, non-thermal energy for atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation that selectively targets cardiomyocytes with minimal to no risk of collateral damage. Among ablation strategies in persistent AF (PersAF), targeting sites other than the pulmonary veins (PVs) remains controversial, with concerns on improved success without increasing the risk of periprocedural complications and stiff left atrium (LA) syndrome. This study evaluates the impact of an ablation strategy beyond PVs using PFA on arrhythmia freedom and LA function in PersAF patients.

Methods: This study included 93 patients with PersAF undergoing first-time PFA targeting PVs and other extra-PV targets. AF-related symptoms, adverse events, electrocardiograms, and transthoracic echocardiograms were assessed at follow-up visits at 1, 6, and 12 months.

Results: Extra-PV targets included posterior wall (100%), anterior roof (50.5%), mitral isthmus (22.6%), anterior wall (36.6%), and right atrium applications (8.6%). No serious procedure-related adverse events were reported. At 1-year follow-up, 82.8% of patients were free from atrial arrhythmias. PFA significantly reduced A-wave velocity of mitral inflow and altered the E/A ratio but did not change LA compliance markers (e.g., LA strain reservoir and LA stiffness index (LASI)). LASI and left ventricular ejection fraction significantly improved from baseline in the PersAF > 3-month group.

Conclusions: One-year atrial arrhythmia freedom in PersAF patients after extensive PFA by means of a multielectrode catheter was high. Extra-PV ablation was safe, did not alter LA compliance but promoted a positive reverse remodeling with improved LA compliance and left ventricular systolic function.

肺静脉外脉冲场消融治疗持续性心房颤动:疗效及对左心房功能的影响。
背景:脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种新型的非热能房颤(AF)导管消融,选择性靶向心肌细胞,附带损伤风险最小至无风险。在持续性房颤(PersAF)的消融策略中,针对肺静脉(pv)以外的部位仍然存在争议,人们关注的是在不增加术中并发症和左心房僵硬(LA)综合征风险的情况下提高成功率。本研究评估了使用PFA的PVs消融策略对PersAF患者心律失常自由度和LA功能的影响。方法:本研究纳入93例首次PFA靶向pv和其他pv外靶点的PersAF患者。在随访1、6和12个月时评估心房颤动相关症状、不良事件、心电图和经胸超声心动图。结果:pv外靶包括后壁(100%)、前顶(50.5%)、二尖瓣峡(22.6%)、前壁(36.6%)和右心房(8.6%)。未报告严重的手术相关不良事件。随访1年,82.8%的患者无房性心律失常。PFA显著降低了二尖瓣流入A波速度,改变了E/A比,但没有改变LA顺应性指标(如LA应变库和LA刚度指数(LASI))。PersAF > 3个月组LASI和左心室射血分数较基线显著改善。结论:经多电极导管广泛PFA治疗的PersAF患者一年房性心律失常自由度高。pv外消融术是安全的,不会改变左室收缩功能的依从性,但会促进正向的反向重构,改善左室收缩功能的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信