Artificial Intelligence Framework for Automated Facial Asymmetry Detection Using Key-Point Analysis and Neural Networks.

Shahab Kavousinejad, Yasamin Vazirizadeh, Mohammad Behnaz, Asghar Ebadifar, Hoori Mirmohammadsadeghi
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Framework for Automated Facial Asymmetry Detection Using Key-Point Analysis and Neural Networks.","authors":"Shahab Kavousinejad, Yasamin Vazirizadeh, Mohammad Behnaz, Asghar Ebadifar, Hoori Mirmohammadsadeghi","doi":"10.1007/s10278-025-01558-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate facial asymmetry assessment is essential in orthodontics, maxillofacial surgery, and plastic surgery. While minor asymmetry is common, severe cases often result from congenital conditions or trauma. Traditional methods struggle to comprehensively quantify asymmetry's extent and direction. This study developed and compared artificial neural networks (ANN) and Siamese neural networks (SNN) to detect facial asymmetry and determine deviation direction (horizontal/vertical). A dataset of 1200 frontal photographs, annotated by three orthodontists, was used. The MediaPipe model facilitated facial landmark detection and midline alignment. Two approaches were employed: (1) extracting features from facial landmarks and using them to train an ANN, and (2) SNN-based comparison of mirrored facial halves. Exploratory data analysis (EDA) was used to quantify facial asymmetry in both vertical and horizontal dimensions. The ANN and SNN performance was evaluated using accuracy, recall, and F1-score. The SNN outperformed ANN, achieving 97% accuracy and strong agreement with expert evaluations (Cohen's Kappa: 0.84 for asymmetry detection, 0.73 for horizontal deviation, and 0.80 for vertical asymmetry). The symmetry group showed 96.14% mean similarity, while the asymmetry group had 83.97%. The SNN's ROC curve yielded an AUC of 0.98, indicating high diagnostic performance. This study demonstrates the potential of AI-driven methods, particularly SNN, for reliable and objective facial asymmetry assessment in clinical settings. Future research should focus on expanding datasets and refining midline alignment to improve accuracy, especially in cases with vertical eye asymmetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-025-01558-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate facial asymmetry assessment is essential in orthodontics, maxillofacial surgery, and plastic surgery. While minor asymmetry is common, severe cases often result from congenital conditions or trauma. Traditional methods struggle to comprehensively quantify asymmetry's extent and direction. This study developed and compared artificial neural networks (ANN) and Siamese neural networks (SNN) to detect facial asymmetry and determine deviation direction (horizontal/vertical). A dataset of 1200 frontal photographs, annotated by three orthodontists, was used. The MediaPipe model facilitated facial landmark detection and midline alignment. Two approaches were employed: (1) extracting features from facial landmarks and using them to train an ANN, and (2) SNN-based comparison of mirrored facial halves. Exploratory data analysis (EDA) was used to quantify facial asymmetry in both vertical and horizontal dimensions. The ANN and SNN performance was evaluated using accuracy, recall, and F1-score. The SNN outperformed ANN, achieving 97% accuracy and strong agreement with expert evaluations (Cohen's Kappa: 0.84 for asymmetry detection, 0.73 for horizontal deviation, and 0.80 for vertical asymmetry). The symmetry group showed 96.14% mean similarity, while the asymmetry group had 83.97%. The SNN's ROC curve yielded an AUC of 0.98, indicating high diagnostic performance. This study demonstrates the potential of AI-driven methods, particularly SNN, for reliable and objective facial asymmetry assessment in clinical settings. Future research should focus on expanding datasets and refining midline alignment to improve accuracy, especially in cases with vertical eye asymmetry.

基于关键点分析和神经网络的人脸不对称自动检测的人工智能框架。
准确的面部不对称评估在正畸、颌面外科和整形外科中是必不可少的。虽然轻微的不对称很常见,但严重的情况通常是由先天性疾病或创伤引起的。传统的方法难以全面量化不对称的程度和方向。本研究发展并比较了人工神经网络(ANN)和暹罗神经网络(SNN)来检测面部不对称并确定偏差方向(水平/垂直)。使用了由三名正畸医生注释的1200张正面照片的数据集。MediaPipe模型有助于面部地标检测和中线对齐。采用了两种方法:(1)从面部地标中提取特征并使用它们来训练人工神经网络;(2)基于snn的镜像面部半部分比较。探索性数据分析(EDA)用于量化面部在垂直和水平维度上的不对称性。使用准确率、召回率和f1评分来评估ANN和SNN的性能。SNN优于人工神经网络,达到97%的准确率,并且与专家评估非常一致(Cohen的Kappa:不对称检测0.84,水平偏差0.73,垂直不对称0.80)。对称组平均相似度为96.14%,不对称组平均相似度为83.97%。SNN的ROC曲线AUC为0.98,具有较高的诊断效能。这项研究证明了人工智能驱动的方法,特别是SNN,在临床环境中可靠和客观的面部不对称评估的潜力。未来的研究应该集中在扩展数据集和改进中线对齐以提高准确性,特别是在垂直眼睛不对称的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信