Transitional Care Management Associated With More Healthy Days At Home, Lower Spending After Hospital Discharge.

MacKenzie L Hughes, Wen Hu, Jackie Soo, Joseph H Joo, Shriram Parashuram, Adil Moiduddin, Steven Sheingold, Joshua M Liao
{"title":"Transitional Care Management Associated With More Healthy Days At Home, Lower Spending After Hospital Discharge.","authors":"MacKenzie L Hughes, Wen Hu, Jackie Soo, Joseph H Joo, Shriram Parashuram, Adil Moiduddin, Steven Sheingold, Joshua M Liao","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2013, Medicare has reimbursed clinicians for delivering transitional care management (TCM) services after patients' discharge from eligible medical facilities. Concurrently, Medicare has implemented population-based Alternative Payment Models (APMs) to encourage patient-centered care, care coordination, and clinician accountability. In this analysis, we used 2017-20 Medicare data to evaluate the effect of TCM on four quality and cost outcomes and the effect of population-based APM participation on the association between TCM and the four outcomes. TCM was associated with more healthy days at home and lower total spending after hospital discharge, with more pronounced differences among patients aligned with population-based APMs compared to nonaligned patients. TCM was also associated with lower readmissions but not differences in mortality; neither finding varied between patients who were versus were not aligned with population-based APMs. These findings suggest that the benefits of TCM may be even greater when patients are aligned with population-based APMs, highlighting potentially complementary effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":519943,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":"44 6","pages":"731-738"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2013, Medicare has reimbursed clinicians for delivering transitional care management (TCM) services after patients' discharge from eligible medical facilities. Concurrently, Medicare has implemented population-based Alternative Payment Models (APMs) to encourage patient-centered care, care coordination, and clinician accountability. In this analysis, we used 2017-20 Medicare data to evaluate the effect of TCM on four quality and cost outcomes and the effect of population-based APM participation on the association between TCM and the four outcomes. TCM was associated with more healthy days at home and lower total spending after hospital discharge, with more pronounced differences among patients aligned with population-based APMs compared to nonaligned patients. TCM was also associated with lower readmissions but not differences in mortality; neither finding varied between patients who were versus were not aligned with population-based APMs. These findings suggest that the benefits of TCM may be even greater when patients are aligned with population-based APMs, highlighting potentially complementary effects.

过渡性护理管理与在家更健康的日子有关,出院后花费更低。
自2013年以来,医疗保险对在患者从符合条件的医疗机构出院后提供过渡性护理管理(TCM)服务的临床医生进行了报销。同时,医疗保险已经实施了基于人群的替代支付模式(APMs),以鼓励以患者为中心的护理、护理协调和临床医生的责任。在本分析中,我们使用2017- 2020年医疗保险数据来评估中医对四种质量和成本结局的影响,以及基于人群的APM参与对中医与四种结局之间关联的影响。中医与在家更健康的日子和出院后更低的总支出相关,与非基于人群的APMs患者相比,遵循人群APMs的患者之间的差异更明显。中药也与较低的再入院率相关,但与死亡率无差异;这两项发现在与人群APMs不一致的患者之间都没有变化。这些发现表明,当患者与基于人群的apm相一致时,中医的益处可能更大,突出了潜在的互补效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信