Safe Patient Mobilization Training: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Nursing and Rehabilitation Professionals.

IF 1
Dawn M Venema, Stacie M L Christensen, Meagan Nyhoff, Anne Skinner, Victoria Kennel
{"title":"Safe Patient Mobilization Training: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Nursing and Rehabilitation Professionals.","authors":"Dawn M Venema, Stacie M L Christensen, Meagan Nyhoff, Anne Skinner, Victoria Kennel","doi":"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to describe healthcare professionals involved in training for patient mobilization and explore associations between professional identity and perceptions of training. Study results might inform the enhancement of staff training programs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive, cross-sectional, online survey was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed over 700 nursing and rehabilitation therapy staff from 18 hospitals. We used the exact Pearson chi-square test to compare frequencies of responses describing training perceptions based on the (1) respondent's professional identity and (2) professional identity of the instructor(s).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred twenty individuals responded to the survey, with 186 indicating their hospital had offered training for patient mobilization within the past year. As learners, nursing staff believed the training had greater value than rehabilitation therapy staff. Respondents more frequently believed training was important and improved confidence when provided by rehabilitation therapists alone or in conjunction with nurses, compared to training provided by nursing staff alone.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Lack of training is a common barrier to patient mobilization cited by nursing staff. Hospital leadership should ensure nursing staff have opportunities to participate in collaborative, interdisciplinary training programs involving rehabilitation staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nursing staff value training in patient mobilization, more so when rehabilitation therapists provided the training.</p>","PeriodicalId":94188,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to describe healthcare professionals involved in training for patient mobilization and explore associations between professional identity and perceptions of training. Study results might inform the enhancement of staff training programs.

Design: A descriptive, cross-sectional, online survey was conducted.

Methods: We surveyed over 700 nursing and rehabilitation therapy staff from 18 hospitals. We used the exact Pearson chi-square test to compare frequencies of responses describing training perceptions based on the (1) respondent's professional identity and (2) professional identity of the instructor(s).

Results: Three hundred twenty individuals responded to the survey, with 186 indicating their hospital had offered training for patient mobilization within the past year. As learners, nursing staff believed the training had greater value than rehabilitation therapy staff. Respondents more frequently believed training was important and improved confidence when provided by rehabilitation therapists alone or in conjunction with nurses, compared to training provided by nursing staff alone.

Clinical relevance: Lack of training is a common barrier to patient mobilization cited by nursing staff. Hospital leadership should ensure nursing staff have opportunities to participate in collaborative, interdisciplinary training programs involving rehabilitation staff.

Conclusions: Nursing staff value training in patient mobilization, more so when rehabilitation therapists provided the training.

安全病人活动训练:护理和康复专业人员的横断面调查。
目的:本研究的目的是描述参与患者动员培训的医疗保健专业人员,并探讨职业认同与培训感知之间的联系。研究结果可能为加强员工培训计划提供信息。设计:进行了一项描述性、横断面的在线调查。方法:对18家医院700余名护理康复治疗人员进行问卷调查。我们使用精确的皮尔逊卡方检验来比较基于(1)被调查者的职业身份和(2)教练的职业身份描述培训感知的回应频率。结果:320人回应了调查,其中186人表示他们的医院在过去一年内提供了病人动员培训。作为学习者,护理人员认为培训比康复治疗人员更有价值。与护理人员单独提供培训相比,受访者更频繁地认为培训是重要的,并且在康复治疗师单独提供或与护士联合提供时提高了信心。临床相关性:缺乏培训是一个常见的障碍,病人动员引用护理人员。医院领导应确保护理人员有机会参与涉及康复人员的协作、跨学科培训项目。结论:护理人员重视患者动员培训,康复治疗师提供培训时更重视患者动员培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信