Characterization of acute radiation-induced vascular changes in animal model of brain tumors using time frequency analysis of DCE MRI information

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1002/mp.17921
Hassan Bagher-Ebadian, Stephen L. Brown, Mohammad M. Ghassemi, Prabhu C. Acharya, James R. Ewing, Indrin J. Chetty, Farzan Siddiqui, Benjamin Movsas, Kundan Thind
{"title":"Characterization of acute radiation-induced vascular changes in animal model of brain tumors using time frequency analysis of DCE MRI information","authors":"Hassan Bagher-Ebadian,&nbsp;Stephen L. Brown,&nbsp;Mohammad M. Ghassemi,&nbsp;Prabhu C. Acharya,&nbsp;James R. Ewing,&nbsp;Indrin J. Chetty,&nbsp;Farzan Siddiqui,&nbsp;Benjamin Movsas,&nbsp;Kundan Thind","doi":"10.1002/mp.17921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recent studies have confirmed the effects of whole-brain radiation therapy (RT) on the blood-brain-barrier and vasculature permeability. Optimal therapeutic targeting of cancer depends on ability to distinguish tumor from normal tissue.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study recruits nested model selection (NMS) and time-frequency analyses of the time-trace of contrast agent from dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI information to characterize the acute (i.e., within hours) RT response of tumor and normal brain tissues in an animal model of brain tumors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty immune-compromised-RNU rats were implanted orthotopically with human U251N glioma cells. Twenty-eight days after the brain implantation, two DCE-MRI studies were performed 24 h apart. 20 Gy stereotactic radiation was delivered 1–6.5 h before the second MRI. NMS-based DCE-MRI analysis was performed to distinguish three different brain regions by model selection using a nested paradigm. Model 1 was characterized by non-leaky vasculature and considered as normal brain tissue. Model 2 was characterized by contrast agent (CA) movement predominantly in one direction, out of the vasculature, and was primarily associated with the tumor boundary. In contrast, Model 3 exhibited contrast agent movement in both directions, into and out of the vasculature, and corresponded to the tumor core. Time-traces of CA concentration from pre- and post-RT DCE-MRI data for the different models were analyzed using wavelet-based coherence and wavelet cross-spectrum phase analyses to characterize and rank the magnitude of RT-induced effects. Four distinct time-direction classes (in-phase/anti-phase with lead/lag time) were introduced to describe the impact of RT on CA concentration profiles, allowing for comparison of RT effects across different model-based zones of rat brains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The time-frequency analyses revealed both average lag and lead times between the pre- and post-RT CA concentration profiles for the three model regions. The average lag times were 2.882 s (95% CI: 2.606–3.157) for Model 1, 1.546 s (95% CI: 1.401–1.691) for Model 2, and 2.515 s (95% CI: 2.319–2.711) for Model 3, all exhibiting anti-phase oscillation. The average lead times were 1.892 s (95% CI: 1.757–2.028) for Model 1, 2.632 s (95% CI: 2.366–2.898) for Model 2, and 2.160 s (95% CI: 2.021–2.299) for Model 3, also with anti-phase oscillation. Results imply that compared to pre-RT, Model 1, 2, and 3 regions that correspond to normal tissue, periphery, and core of the tumor, show lag-time (2.882 [2.606 3.157] s), lead-time (2.632 [2.366 2.898] s), and lag-time (2.515 [2.319 2.711] s), in their post-RT time-trace of CA concentration, respectively. RT-induced lead/lag time changes were found to be more significant for the lower frequency components of the CA concentration profiles of all the three models. The analysis further revealed that Model 2 (tumor periphery) exhibited the most significant lead time, implying a shorter retainage-time of CA after radiation. Conversely, Model 1, normal tissue, showed the most pronounced lag-time, suggesting longer retainage-time of CA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates a novel approach to analyze the time-frequency information of DCE-MRI CA concentration profiles of the animal brain to detect acute changes in tumor and normal tissue physiology in response to RT that has clinical translatability and has potential to improve treatment planning and RT efficacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have confirmed the effects of whole-brain radiation therapy (RT) on the blood-brain-barrier and vasculature permeability. Optimal therapeutic targeting of cancer depends on ability to distinguish tumor from normal tissue.

Purpose

This study recruits nested model selection (NMS) and time-frequency analyses of the time-trace of contrast agent from dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI information to characterize the acute (i.e., within hours) RT response of tumor and normal brain tissues in an animal model of brain tumors.

Methods

Twenty immune-compromised-RNU rats were implanted orthotopically with human U251N glioma cells. Twenty-eight days after the brain implantation, two DCE-MRI studies were performed 24 h apart. 20 Gy stereotactic radiation was delivered 1–6.5 h before the second MRI. NMS-based DCE-MRI analysis was performed to distinguish three different brain regions by model selection using a nested paradigm. Model 1 was characterized by non-leaky vasculature and considered as normal brain tissue. Model 2 was characterized by contrast agent (CA) movement predominantly in one direction, out of the vasculature, and was primarily associated with the tumor boundary. In contrast, Model 3 exhibited contrast agent movement in both directions, into and out of the vasculature, and corresponded to the tumor core. Time-traces of CA concentration from pre- and post-RT DCE-MRI data for the different models were analyzed using wavelet-based coherence and wavelet cross-spectrum phase analyses to characterize and rank the magnitude of RT-induced effects. Four distinct time-direction classes (in-phase/anti-phase with lead/lag time) were introduced to describe the impact of RT on CA concentration profiles, allowing for comparison of RT effects across different model-based zones of rat brains.

Results

The time-frequency analyses revealed both average lag and lead times between the pre- and post-RT CA concentration profiles for the three model regions. The average lag times were 2.882 s (95% CI: 2.606–3.157) for Model 1, 1.546 s (95% CI: 1.401–1.691) for Model 2, and 2.515 s (95% CI: 2.319–2.711) for Model 3, all exhibiting anti-phase oscillation. The average lead times were 1.892 s (95% CI: 1.757–2.028) for Model 1, 2.632 s (95% CI: 2.366–2.898) for Model 2, and 2.160 s (95% CI: 2.021–2.299) for Model 3, also with anti-phase oscillation. Results imply that compared to pre-RT, Model 1, 2, and 3 regions that correspond to normal tissue, periphery, and core of the tumor, show lag-time (2.882 [2.606 3.157] s), lead-time (2.632 [2.366 2.898] s), and lag-time (2.515 [2.319 2.711] s), in their post-RT time-trace of CA concentration, respectively. RT-induced lead/lag time changes were found to be more significant for the lower frequency components of the CA concentration profiles of all the three models. The analysis further revealed that Model 2 (tumor periphery) exhibited the most significant lead time, implying a shorter retainage-time of CA after radiation. Conversely, Model 1, normal tissue, showed the most pronounced lag-time, suggesting longer retainage-time of CA.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a novel approach to analyze the time-frequency information of DCE-MRI CA concentration profiles of the animal brain to detect acute changes in tumor and normal tissue physiology in response to RT that has clinical translatability and has potential to improve treatment planning and RT efficacy.

利用DCE MRI信息的时频分析表征急性辐射引起的脑肿瘤动物模型血管改变。
背景:近年来的研究证实了全脑放射治疗(RT)对血脑屏障和血管通透性的影响。癌症的最佳治疗目标取决于区分肿瘤和正常组织的能力。目的:本研究采用嵌套模型选择(NMS)和对动态增强MRI信息中造影剂时间轨迹的时频分析来表征脑肿瘤动物模型中肿瘤和正常脑组织的急性(即小时内)RT反应。方法:将20只免疫功能低下的rnu大鼠原位植入人U251N胶质瘤细胞。脑植入后28天,间隔24小时进行两次DCE-MRI检查。在第二次MRI前1-6.5 h进行20 Gy立体定向放疗。使用嵌套范式进行基于神经网络的DCE-MRI分析,通过模型选择来区分三个不同的大脑区域。模型1的特点是血管无渗漏,被认为是正常脑组织。模型2的特征是造影剂(CA)主要向一个方向运动,脱离脉管系统,主要与肿瘤边界有关。相比之下,模型3表现出对比剂在血管内外两个方向的运动,与肿瘤核心相对应。使用基于小波的相干性和小波跨谱相位分析分析了不同模型的rt诱导效应前后DCE-MRI数据中CA浓度的时间轨迹,以表征rt诱导效应的大小并对其进行排序。引入了四个不同的时间方向类别(同相/反相,超前/滞后时间)来描述RT对CA浓度分布的影响,从而可以比较RT在大鼠大脑不同基于模型的区域的影响。结果:时间-频率分析揭示了三个模型区域的rt前后CA浓度曲线之间的平均滞后时间和前置时间。模型1的平均滞后时间为2.882 s (95% CI: 2.606-3.157),模型2的平均滞后时间为1.546 s (95% CI: 1.401-1.691),模型3的平均滞后时间为2.515 s (95% CI: 2.319-2.711),均表现为反相位振荡。模型1的平均交货期为1.892秒(95% CI: 1.75 -2.028),模型2的平均交货期为2.632秒(95% CI: 2.366-2.898),模型3的平均交货期为2.160秒(95% CI: 2.021-2.299),也存在反相位振荡。结果表明,与放疗前相比,模型1、模型2和模型3对应于正常组织、肿瘤周围和肿瘤核心的CA浓度在放疗后的时间轨迹上分别呈现滞后时间(2.882 [2.606 3.157]s)、超前时间(2.632 [2.366 2.898]s)和滞后时间(2.515 [2.319 2.711]s)。rt诱导的超前/滞后时间变化在三种模型的CA浓度曲线的低频成分中更为显著。进一步分析发现,模型2(肿瘤周围)的提前期最显著,这意味着放疗后CA的保留时间更短。相反,模型1(正常组织)表现出最明显的延迟,表明CA的保留时间更长。结论:本研究展示了一种新的方法来分析DCE-MRI动物大脑CA浓度谱的时-频率信息,以检测肿瘤和正常组织生理对RT的急性变化,具有临床可翻译性,并有可能改善治疗计划和RT疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信