M Bradley Drummond, Caleb C Hemphill, Tanisha Hill, Amanda Boe, Daisy Yu, Jill A Ohar
{"title":"Use of a Digital Inhaler to Assess COPD Disease Variability and Identify Impending Acute COPD Exacerbations: A Pilot Study.","authors":"M Bradley Drummond, Caleb C Hemphill, Tanisha Hill, Amanda Boe, Daisy Yu, Jill A Ohar","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Studies have shown that digital inhalers, using remote monitoring data, can improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes, such as prediction of impending asthma exacerbations. There is limited research on the clinical utility of physiologic inhalation parameters and inhaler medication use data captured by a digital inhaler to identify impending acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective was to determine variation in digital inhaler-measured physiologic and inhaler use metrics in ambulatory chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in advance of an AECOPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 4, open-label, 3-month pilot study was conducted at 2 U.S. centers. Participants used the ProAir Digihaler for primary rescue medication during the study. Participants were contacted monthly for COPD disease assessments. Inhaler metric variations leading up to an AECOPD were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ProAir Digihaler measured key inhalation metrics (mean [standard deviation]) including peak inspiratory flow (PIF) (67.6 [20.3]L/min), inhalation volume (1.40 [0.60]L), and recorded inhaler use from 9649 inhalations among 40 participants. Statistically significant reductions were observed in inhalation volume (1.4L versus 1.1L), inhalation duration (1875msec versus 1492.1msec), and time to peak (500msec versus 376.3msec) (<i>p<</i>0.02 for all comparisons) during the 14 days preceding an AECOPD. There were no significant changes observed in PIF (67.2 versus 63.3, <i>p</i>=0.1) and number of inhalations per day (2.7 versus 3.7, <i>p</i>=0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiologic data captured by a digital inhaler may serve as a valuable remote patient monitoring tool to help support the identification of early or impending AECOPDs among ambulatory COPD patients and monitor COPD disease variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":"12 3","pages":"250-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: Studies have shown that digital inhalers, using remote monitoring data, can improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes, such as prediction of impending asthma exacerbations. There is limited research on the clinical utility of physiologic inhalation parameters and inhaler medication use data captured by a digital inhaler to identify impending acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs).
Objectives: The objective was to determine variation in digital inhaler-measured physiologic and inhaler use metrics in ambulatory chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in advance of an AECOPD.
Methods: This phase 4, open-label, 3-month pilot study was conducted at 2 U.S. centers. Participants used the ProAir Digihaler for primary rescue medication during the study. Participants were contacted monthly for COPD disease assessments. Inhaler metric variations leading up to an AECOPD were evaluated.
Results: The ProAir Digihaler measured key inhalation metrics (mean [standard deviation]) including peak inspiratory flow (PIF) (67.6 [20.3]L/min), inhalation volume (1.40 [0.60]L), and recorded inhaler use from 9649 inhalations among 40 participants. Statistically significant reductions were observed in inhalation volume (1.4L versus 1.1L), inhalation duration (1875msec versus 1492.1msec), and time to peak (500msec versus 376.3msec) (p<0.02 for all comparisons) during the 14 days preceding an AECOPD. There were no significant changes observed in PIF (67.2 versus 63.3, p=0.1) and number of inhalations per day (2.7 versus 3.7, p=0.2).
Conclusion: Physiologic data captured by a digital inhaler may serve as a valuable remote patient monitoring tool to help support the identification of early or impending AECOPDs among ambulatory COPD patients and monitor COPD disease variability.
理由:研究表明,使用远程监测数据的数字吸入器可以改善药物依从性和临床结果,例如预测即将发生的哮喘恶化。通过数字吸入器捕获的生理吸入参数和吸入器药物使用数据来识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPDs)即将急性加重的临床应用研究有限。目的:目的是确定动态慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在AECOPD发生前数字吸入器测量的生理和吸入器使用指标的变化。方法:这项4期、开放标签、3个月的试点研究在美国2个中心进行。在研究期间,参与者使用ProAir Digihaler作为主要抢救药物。每月联系参与者进行COPD疾病评估。评估导致AECOPD的吸入器计量变化。结果:ProAir Digihaler测量了关键吸入指标(平均[标准差]),包括峰值吸气流量(PIF) (67.6 [20.3]L/min),吸入量(1.40 [0.60]L),并记录了40名参与者9649次吸入的吸入器使用情况。在AECOPD前14天,吸入量(1.4L vs 1.1L)、吸入持续时间(1875msec vs 1492.1msec)和高峰时间(500msec vs 376.3msec)(所有比较的p0.02)均有统计学意义的降低。PIF (67.2 vs 63.3, p=0.1)和每天吸入次数(2.7 vs 3.7, p=0.2)无显著变化。结论:数字吸入器捕获的生理数据可以作为一种有价值的远程患者监测工具,帮助识别门诊COPD患者的早期或即将发生的aecopd,并监测COPD疾病的变异性。