Use of a Digital Inhaler to Assess COPD Disease Variability and Identify Impending Acute COPD Exacerbations: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
M Bradley Drummond, Caleb C Hemphill, Tanisha Hill, Amanda Boe, Daisy Yu, Jill A Ohar
{"title":"Use of a Digital Inhaler to Assess COPD Disease Variability and Identify Impending Acute COPD Exacerbations: A Pilot Study.","authors":"M Bradley Drummond, Caleb C Hemphill, Tanisha Hill, Amanda Boe, Daisy Yu, Jill A Ohar","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Studies have shown that digital inhalers, using remote monitoring data, can improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes, such as prediction of impending asthma exacerbations. There is limited research on the clinical utility of physiologic inhalation parameters and inhaler medication use data captured by a digital inhaler to identify impending acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective was to determine variation in digital inhaler-measured physiologic and inhaler use metrics in ambulatory chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in advance of an AECOPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This phase 4, open-label, 3-month pilot study was conducted at 2 U.S. centers. Participants used the ProAir Digihaler for primary rescue medication during the study. Participants were contacted monthly for COPD disease assessments. Inhaler metric variations leading up to an AECOPD were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ProAir Digihaler measured key inhalation metrics (mean [standard deviation]) including peak inspiratory flow (PIF) (67.6 [20.3]L/min), inhalation volume (1.40 [0.60]L), and recorded inhaler use from 9649 inhalations among 40 participants. Statistically significant reductions were observed in inhalation volume (1.4L versus 1.1L), inhalation duration (1875msec versus 1492.1msec), and time to peak (500msec versus 376.3msec) (<i>p<</i>0.02 for all comparisons) during the 14 days preceding an AECOPD. There were no significant changes observed in PIF (67.2 versus 63.3, <i>p</i>=0.1) and number of inhalations per day (2.7 versus 3.7, <i>p</i>=0.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiologic data captured by a digital inhaler may serve as a valuable remote patient monitoring tool to help support the identification of early or impending AECOPDs among ambulatory COPD patients and monitor COPD disease variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":51340,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","volume":"12 3","pages":"250-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases-Journal of the Copd Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0555","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Studies have shown that digital inhalers, using remote monitoring data, can improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes, such as prediction of impending asthma exacerbations. There is limited research on the clinical utility of physiologic inhalation parameters and inhaler medication use data captured by a digital inhaler to identify impending acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs).

Objectives: The objective was to determine variation in digital inhaler-measured physiologic and inhaler use metrics in ambulatory chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in advance of an AECOPD.

Methods: This phase 4, open-label, 3-month pilot study was conducted at 2 U.S. centers. Participants used the ProAir Digihaler for primary rescue medication during the study. Participants were contacted monthly for COPD disease assessments. Inhaler metric variations leading up to an AECOPD were evaluated.

Results: The ProAir Digihaler measured key inhalation metrics (mean [standard deviation]) including peak inspiratory flow (PIF) (67.6 [20.3]L/min), inhalation volume (1.40 [0.60]L), and recorded inhaler use from 9649 inhalations among 40 participants. Statistically significant reductions were observed in inhalation volume (1.4L versus 1.1L), inhalation duration (1875msec versus 1492.1msec), and time to peak (500msec versus 376.3msec) (p<0.02 for all comparisons) during the 14 days preceding an AECOPD. There were no significant changes observed in PIF (67.2 versus 63.3, p=0.1) and number of inhalations per day (2.7 versus 3.7, p=0.2).

Conclusion: Physiologic data captured by a digital inhaler may serve as a valuable remote patient monitoring tool to help support the identification of early or impending AECOPDs among ambulatory COPD patients and monitor COPD disease variability.

使用数字吸入器评估COPD疾病变异性和识别即将发生的急性COPD恶化:一项试点研究。
理由:研究表明,使用远程监测数据的数字吸入器可以改善药物依从性和临床结果,例如预测即将发生的哮喘恶化。通过数字吸入器捕获的生理吸入参数和吸入器药物使用数据来识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPDs)即将急性加重的临床应用研究有限。目的:目的是确定动态慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在AECOPD发生前数字吸入器测量的生理和吸入器使用指标的变化。方法:这项4期、开放标签、3个月的试点研究在美国2个中心进行。在研究期间,参与者使用ProAir Digihaler作为主要抢救药物。每月联系参与者进行COPD疾病评估。评估导致AECOPD的吸入器计量变化。结果:ProAir Digihaler测量了关键吸入指标(平均[标准差]),包括峰值吸气流量(PIF) (67.6 [20.3]L/min),吸入量(1.40 [0.60]L),并记录了40名参与者9649次吸入的吸入器使用情况。在AECOPD前14天,吸入量(1.4L vs 1.1L)、吸入持续时间(1875msec vs 1492.1msec)和高峰时间(500msec vs 376.3msec)(所有比较的p0.02)均有统计学意义的降低。PIF (67.2 vs 63.3, p=0.1)和每天吸入次数(2.7 vs 3.7, p=0.2)无显著变化。结论:数字吸入器捕获的生理数据可以作为一种有价值的远程患者监测工具,帮助识别门诊COPD患者的早期或即将发生的aecopd,并监测COPD疾病的变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信