Special Topic Burnout: Examining Health Professional Trainee Burnout: Lessons Learned Using Qualitative Inquiry to Elicit Rich Data.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Ellen Ahlness, Deborah R Levy
{"title":"Special Topic Burnout: Examining Health Professional Trainee Burnout: Lessons Learned Using Qualitative Inquiry to Elicit Rich Data.","authors":"Ellen Ahlness, Deborah R Levy","doi":"10.1055/a-2624-5482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health professional (HP) trainee burnout is hard to capture. There are many validated quantitative tools to assess trainee burnout, but fewer qualitative methodological tools that can elicit rich and trustworthy qualitative data on HP trainee burnout.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Report the process, results, and lessons learned while developing and pilot testing a qualitative tool to assess HP trainee experiences of burnout to complement quantitative tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a set of semi-structured interview questions to probe burnout for HP trainees which were refined using a Modified Delphi approach (n= 10 subject matter experts). We conducted pilot testing (n=43 interviews with n=14 trainees).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present the results of pilot testing a novel qualitative tool to assess HP trainee experiences of burnout, consisting of 3 core questions and 3 follow-up probes that elicit data on key dimensions of HP trainee burnout for integration into a structured or semi-structured interview guide.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present results as lessons learned, which can support the further development of tools to articulate HP trainee perspectives in studying burnout, especially during health system transitions. Developing qualitative measurement tools designed to be used with well-validated established quantitative tools may be a complex process but is critical in efforts to mitigate HP trainee burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2624-5482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health professional (HP) trainee burnout is hard to capture. There are many validated quantitative tools to assess trainee burnout, but fewer qualitative methodological tools that can elicit rich and trustworthy qualitative data on HP trainee burnout.

Objective: Report the process, results, and lessons learned while developing and pilot testing a qualitative tool to assess HP trainee experiences of burnout to complement quantitative tools.

Methods: We developed a set of semi-structured interview questions to probe burnout for HP trainees which were refined using a Modified Delphi approach (n= 10 subject matter experts). We conducted pilot testing (n=43 interviews with n=14 trainees).

Results: We present the results of pilot testing a novel qualitative tool to assess HP trainee experiences of burnout, consisting of 3 core questions and 3 follow-up probes that elicit data on key dimensions of HP trainee burnout for integration into a structured or semi-structured interview guide.

Conclusion: We present results as lessons learned, which can support the further development of tools to articulate HP trainee perspectives in studying burnout, especially during health system transitions. Developing qualitative measurement tools designed to be used with well-validated established quantitative tools may be a complex process but is critical in efforts to mitigate HP trainee burnout.

专题倦怠:检查卫生专业培训生倦怠:使用定性调查得出丰富数据的经验教训。
背景:卫生专业人员(HP)受训人员的职业倦怠很难被捕获。有许多经过验证的定量工具来评估培训生倦怠,但很少有定性的方法工具可以得出丰富而可靠的惠普培训生倦怠的定性数据。目的:报告开发和试点测试定性工具的过程、结果和经验教训,以评估HP培训生的倦怠经历,以补充定量工具。方法:我们开发了一套半结构化的面试问题来调查HP学员的倦怠,并使用改进的德尔菲法对其进行了改进(n= 10名主题专家)。我们进行了试点测试(n=43次访谈,n=14名受训者)。结果:我们展示了一种新的定性工具的试点测试结果,该工具用于评估惠普实习生的倦怠体验,包括3个核心问题和3个后续调查,这些调查收集了惠普实习生倦怠的关键维度的数据,并将其整合到结构化或半结构化的面试指南中。结论:我们将研究结果作为经验教训,可以支持进一步开发工具,以阐明HP受训人员在研究倦怠方面的观点,特别是在卫生系统转型期间。开发定性测量工具,与经过充分验证的已建立的定量工具一起使用可能是一个复杂的过程,但对于减轻HP培训生倦怠的努力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信