Special Topic Burnout: Ambient Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Pediatric Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Naveed Rabbani, Mondira Ray, Eleanor Verhagen, Jonathan Hatoun, Laura Patane, Louis Vernacchio
{"title":"Special Topic Burnout: Ambient Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Pediatric Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Naveed Rabbani, Mondira Ray, Eleanor Verhagen, Jonathan Hatoun, Laura Patane, Louis Vernacchio","doi":"10.1055/a-2625-0750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Quantify the effect of ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribe technology on work experience, clinical operations, and patient experience in pediatric primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 12-week study of 39 clinicians within a large pediatric primary care network. Clinician experience was measured using a custom survey instrument which included a combination of discrete and free-text responses. Qualitative analysis of free-text responses provided additional context and identified key facilitators and barriers to optimal usage. Proprietary EHR efficiency measures and utilization data were used to further quantify clinician experience, adoption, and operational effects. Patient experience was measured using a vendor-supplied survey instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI scribe technology was used in 32% of eligible encounters (6,249 of 19,264). Survey responses demonstrated significant heterogeneity in clinician experience. The most commonly reported benefits were reduction in self-perceived cognitive burden (21/39), ability to finish work sooner (18/39), and ability to enjoy clinical work more (18/39). No significant change in EHR efficiency measures around documentation time, afterhours EHR time, total EHR time, or visit closure rates were observed. Clinicians reported AI scribes were most helpful for urgent care visits and for summarizing the history of present illness. Areas of improvement specific to pediatric primary care include suboptimal performance in summarizing and organizing content relating to preventive and behavioral health visits. Patient survey responses showed no difference in Net Promoter Score and related patient experience questions between ambient and non-ambient encounters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A subset of clinicians reported self-perceived improvements in work experience despite unchanged EHR efficiency measures. Heterogeneity in clinician experience suggests that benefit from ambient technology likely depends on personal and contextual factors. Enhancements to note organization and facility with pediatric well visit and behavioral health content could improve the utility of this tool for pediatric primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2625-0750","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Quantify the effect of ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribe technology on work experience, clinical operations, and patient experience in pediatric primary care.

Methods: We conducted a 12-week study of 39 clinicians within a large pediatric primary care network. Clinician experience was measured using a custom survey instrument which included a combination of discrete and free-text responses. Qualitative analysis of free-text responses provided additional context and identified key facilitators and barriers to optimal usage. Proprietary EHR efficiency measures and utilization data were used to further quantify clinician experience, adoption, and operational effects. Patient experience was measured using a vendor-supplied survey instrument.

Results: AI scribe technology was used in 32% of eligible encounters (6,249 of 19,264). Survey responses demonstrated significant heterogeneity in clinician experience. The most commonly reported benefits were reduction in self-perceived cognitive burden (21/39), ability to finish work sooner (18/39), and ability to enjoy clinical work more (18/39). No significant change in EHR efficiency measures around documentation time, afterhours EHR time, total EHR time, or visit closure rates were observed. Clinicians reported AI scribes were most helpful for urgent care visits and for summarizing the history of present illness. Areas of improvement specific to pediatric primary care include suboptimal performance in summarizing and organizing content relating to preventive and behavioral health visits. Patient survey responses showed no difference in Net Promoter Score and related patient experience questions between ambient and non-ambient encounters.

Discussion: A subset of clinicians reported self-perceived improvements in work experience despite unchanged EHR efficiency measures. Heterogeneity in clinician experience suggests that benefit from ambient technology likely depends on personal and contextual factors. Enhancements to note organization and facility with pediatric well visit and behavioral health content could improve the utility of this tool for pediatric primary care.

专题倦怠:儿童初级保健中的环境人工智能抄写员:一项混合方法研究。
目的:量化环境人工智能(AI)抄写技术对儿科初级保健工作经验、临床操作和患者体验的影响。方法:我们在一个大型儿科初级保健网络中对39名临床医生进行了为期12周的研究。临床医生的经验是用一种定制的调查工具来测量的,其中包括离散和自由文本回答的组合。对自由文本回应的定性分析提供了额外的背景,并确定了最佳使用的关键促进因素和障碍。专有的电子病历效率测量和利用数据用于进一步量化临床医生的经验、采用情况和操作效果。使用供应商提供的调查仪器测量患者体验。结果:在符合条件的就诊中,有32%(19264例中有6249例)使用了AI抄写技术。调查结果显示临床医生经验存在显著的异质性。最常见的益处是减少了自我认知负担(21/39),能够更快地完成工作(18/39),能够更多地享受临床工作(18/39)。在记录时间、下班后电子病历时间、总电子病历时间或就诊结束率等电子病历效率指标方面没有观察到显著变化。临床医生报告说,人工智能抄写员对紧急护理访问和总结当前病史最有帮助。儿科初级保健的具体改进领域包括在总结和组织与预防和行为健康访问有关的内容方面表现不佳。患者调查反应显示,在环境和非环境遭遇之间,净推荐值和相关的患者体验问题没有差异。讨论:一小部分临床医生报告说,尽管电子病历效率措施没有改变,但他们的工作经验有所改善。临床医生经验的异质性表明,环境技术的益处可能取决于个人和环境因素。加强组织和设施的儿科健康访问和行为健康内容可以提高该工具在儿科初级保健中的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信