Introduction of a Healthcare System Lens-of-Equity Measurement Strategy to Optimize Breast Cancer Screening.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Danielle Jungst, Anthony Solomonides, Chad Konchak
{"title":"Introduction of a Healthcare System Lens-of-Equity Measurement Strategy to Optimize Breast Cancer Screening.","authors":"Danielle Jungst, Anthony Solomonides, Chad Konchak","doi":"10.1055/a-2621-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Health equity is greatly impacted by the systems and processes with which health systems deliver care. Given the minimal guidance on measurement and reporting of health inequities specific to key population health outcomes, a solution for measurement of health equity is proposed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The concept of a lens of equity was adopted to disaggregate common measures such as breast cancer screening rates in order to expose inequities across neighborhoods and races in populations served. Two lenses of equity were introduced into the corporate measurement systems, race/ethnicity as measured in the electronic health record, and a surrogate measure of family income.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An Equity category wasadded to our measurement systems and counted towards our corporate goals (\"system scorecards\") along with data insights and discovery tools to support the efforts of the breast cancer screening improvement teams. Over a one-year timeframe, Endeavor Health not only met but exceeded its breast cancer screening equity goal, increasing mammography adherence from 73% to 82.6% among residents in the lowest income neighborhoods served.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The analytics and data systems that support complex healthcare measurement tools require diligent and thoughtful design to meet external reporting requirements and support the internal teams who aim to improve the care of populations served.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analytic approach presented may be readily extended to populations with other potentially impactful differences in social determinants and health status. A \"lens-of-equity\" tool may be established along similar lines, allowing policy and strategy initiatives to be appropriately targeted and successfully implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2621-0110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Health equity is greatly impacted by the systems and processes with which health systems deliver care. Given the minimal guidance on measurement and reporting of health inequities specific to key population health outcomes, a solution for measurement of health equity is proposed.

Materials and methods: The concept of a lens of equity was adopted to disaggregate common measures such as breast cancer screening rates in order to expose inequities across neighborhoods and races in populations served. Two lenses of equity were introduced into the corporate measurement systems, race/ethnicity as measured in the electronic health record, and a surrogate measure of family income.

Results: An Equity category wasadded to our measurement systems and counted towards our corporate goals ("system scorecards") along with data insights and discovery tools to support the efforts of the breast cancer screening improvement teams. Over a one-year timeframe, Endeavor Health not only met but exceeded its breast cancer screening equity goal, increasing mammography adherence from 73% to 82.6% among residents in the lowest income neighborhoods served.

Discussion: The analytics and data systems that support complex healthcare measurement tools require diligent and thoughtful design to meet external reporting requirements and support the internal teams who aim to improve the care of populations served.

Conclusions: The analytic approach presented may be readily extended to populations with other potentially impactful differences in social determinants and health status. A "lens-of-equity" tool may be established along similar lines, allowing policy and strategy initiatives to be appropriately targeted and successfully implemented.

介绍医疗保健系统的公平透镜测量策略,以优化乳腺癌筛查。
目标:卫生公平在很大程度上受到卫生系统提供保健的系统和程序的影响。鉴于在衡量和报告针对关键人口健康结果的卫生不公平方面的指导很少,提出了衡量卫生公平的解决办法。材料和方法:采用公平镜头的概念来分解常见的措施,如乳腺癌筛查率,以揭示服务人群中社区和种族之间的不平等。公司衡量系统中引入了两种公平的视角,一种是电子健康记录中衡量的种族/民族,另一种是家庭收入的替代衡量标准。结果:我们的测量系统中增加了一个公平类别,并将其计入我们的公司目标(“系统记分卡”),以及数据见解和发现工具,以支持乳腺癌筛查改进团队的努力。在一年的时间框架内,Endeavor Health不仅达到而且超过了其乳腺癌筛查公平目标,将最低收入社区居民的乳房x光检查依从性从73%提高到82.6%。讨论:支持复杂医疗保健测量工具的分析和数据系统需要勤奋和深思熟虑的设计,以满足外部报告需求,并支持旨在改善所服务人群护理的内部团队。结论:提出的分析方法可以很容易地扩展到在社会决定因素和健康状况方面存在其他潜在影响差异的人群。可以按照类似的思路建立一个“公平视角”工具,使政策和战略倡议能够有适当的目标并成功地执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信