A Dutch clinical practice guideline for paediatric palliative care: a systematic review and recommendations on psychosocial care including preloss and bereavement care.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kim C van Teunenbroek, Renée L Mulder, A A Eduard Verhagen, Leontien C M Kremer, Jeanette L Falkenburg, Petra Honig-Mazer, Esther M M van den Bergh, Marijke C Kars, Johannes M A Verheijden, Hester Rippen, Brigitt C M Borggreve, Eline M Kochen, Erna M C Michiels
{"title":"A Dutch clinical practice guideline for paediatric palliative care: a systematic review and recommendations on psychosocial care including preloss and bereavement care.","authors":"Kim C van Teunenbroek, Renée L Mulder, A A Eduard Verhagen, Leontien C M Kremer, Jeanette L Falkenburg, Petra Honig-Mazer, Esther M M van den Bergh, Marijke C Kars, Johannes M A Verheijden, Hester Rippen, Brigitt C M Borggreve, Eline M Kochen, Erna M C Michiels","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01763-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with life-threatening and life-limiting conditions and their families are confronted with many uncertainties, incremental losses, and difficult decisions. Attentiveness to psychosocial care, including psychological, social, and spiritual concerns, is essential during the child's life until end-of-life and during bereavement and determines quality of life and wellbeing of child and family. However, use and integration of psychosocial care is found to be challenging. In this paper, we provide recommendations that aim to optimise psychosocial care including preloss and bereavement care in paediatric palliative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary guideline development panel of 25 experts in paediatric palliative care and nine parents was established to develop recommendations on psychosocial care including preloss and bereavement care. We performed a systematic literature search to identify evidence focussing on effectivity of interventions described in systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and RCTs. From the search, we also derived evidence from SRs of observational, qualitative, or mixed-method studies on preloss and bereavement care. The GRADE methodology was used for appraising evidence. We used existing guidelines to deal with lack of evidence. Recommendations were formulated based on evidence, existing guidelines, clinical expertise, and patient and family values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total two SRs of RCTs and six RCTs that reported on the effect of psychological interventions, spiritual support interventions, and bereavement care intervention. The evidence showed that only some of the interventions improve certain psychosocial outcomes in children or parents. We were unable to draw conclusions on which intervention is most effective, due to the high variability in interventions and measured outcomes. The evidence from ten SRs of observational, qualitative, or mixed-method studies was used as a basis for preloss and bereavement care recommendations. In total, we formulated 48 recommendations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With the provided recommendations, we aim to optimise psychosocial care for children with life-threatening and life-limiting conditions and their families. Psychosocial care should be tailored to the child and family. We found a lack of evidence on psychosocial care including preloss and bereavement care. Although very challenging, we propose implementing strategies to improve research and thereby further optimise quality of paediatric palliative care. These strategies include the development of a standard set of outcomes and to conduct well-designed multisite RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01763-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with life-threatening and life-limiting conditions and their families are confronted with many uncertainties, incremental losses, and difficult decisions. Attentiveness to psychosocial care, including psychological, social, and spiritual concerns, is essential during the child's life until end-of-life and during bereavement and determines quality of life and wellbeing of child and family. However, use and integration of psychosocial care is found to be challenging. In this paper, we provide recommendations that aim to optimise psychosocial care including preloss and bereavement care in paediatric palliative care.

Methods: A multidisciplinary guideline development panel of 25 experts in paediatric palliative care and nine parents was established to develop recommendations on psychosocial care including preloss and bereavement care. We performed a systematic literature search to identify evidence focussing on effectivity of interventions described in systematic reviews (SRs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and RCTs. From the search, we also derived evidence from SRs of observational, qualitative, or mixed-method studies on preloss and bereavement care. The GRADE methodology was used for appraising evidence. We used existing guidelines to deal with lack of evidence. Recommendations were formulated based on evidence, existing guidelines, clinical expertise, and patient and family values.

Results: We identified a total two SRs of RCTs and six RCTs that reported on the effect of psychological interventions, spiritual support interventions, and bereavement care intervention. The evidence showed that only some of the interventions improve certain psychosocial outcomes in children or parents. We were unable to draw conclusions on which intervention is most effective, due to the high variability in interventions and measured outcomes. The evidence from ten SRs of observational, qualitative, or mixed-method studies was used as a basis for preloss and bereavement care recommendations. In total, we formulated 48 recommendations.

Discussion: With the provided recommendations, we aim to optimise psychosocial care for children with life-threatening and life-limiting conditions and their families. Psychosocial care should be tailored to the child and family. We found a lack of evidence on psychosocial care including preloss and bereavement care. Although very challenging, we propose implementing strategies to improve research and thereby further optimise quality of paediatric palliative care. These strategies include the development of a standard set of outcomes and to conduct well-designed multisite RCTs.

荷兰儿科姑息治疗临床实践指南:关于心理社会护理的系统审查和建议,包括失前期和丧亲护理。
背景:患有危及生命和限制生命疾病的儿童及其家庭面临着许多不确定因素,不断增加的损失和艰难的决定。对心理社会护理的关注,包括心理、社会和精神方面的关注,在儿童直至生命终结和丧亲期间至关重要,并决定儿童和家庭的生活质量和福祉。然而,社会心理护理的使用和整合被认为是具有挑战性的。在本文中,我们提供的建议,旨在优化心理社会护理,包括在儿科姑息治疗前和丧亲护理。方法:建立了一个由25名儿科姑息治疗专家和9名家长组成的多学科指南制定小组,以制定包括失前和丧亲护理在内的心理社会护理建议。我们进行了系统的文献检索,以确定随机对照试验(rct)和随机对照试验(rct)的系统评价(SRs)中描述的干预措施有效性的证据。从搜索中,我们还从观察性、定性或混合方法的研究中获得了关于失前和丧亲护理的证据。GRADE方法用于评价证据。我们使用现有的指导方针来处理缺乏证据的问题。建议是根据证据、现有指南、临床专业知识以及患者和家庭价值观制定的。结果:我们共确定了两组随机对照试验和六组随机对照试验,这些随机对照试验报告了心理干预、精神支持干预和丧亲护理干预的效果。证据表明,只有一些干预措施改善了儿童或父母的某些社会心理结果。由于干预措施和测量结果的高度可变性,我们无法得出哪种干预措施最有效的结论。观察性、定性或混合方法研究的10个SRs的证据被用作丧失前和丧亲护理建议的基础。我们一共提出了48条建议。讨论:根据提供的建议,我们的目标是优化危及生命和限制生命的儿童及其家庭的社会心理护理。心理社会护理应针对儿童和家庭量身定制。我们发现缺乏关于心理社会护理的证据,包括失前和丧亲护理。虽然非常具有挑战性,我们提出实施战略,以提高研究,从而进一步优化儿科姑息治疗的质量。这些策略包括制定一套标准的结果,并进行设计良好的多地点随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信