Decision support using machine learning for predicting adequate bladder filling in prostate radiotherapy: a feasibility study.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nipon Saiyo, Kritsrun Assawanuwat, Patthra Janthawanno, Sumana Paduka, Kantamanee Prempetch, Thammasak Chanphol, Bualookkaew Sakchatchawan, Sangutid Thongsawad
{"title":"Decision support using machine learning for predicting adequate bladder filling in prostate radiotherapy: a feasibility study.","authors":"Nipon Saiyo, Kritsrun Assawanuwat, Patthra Janthawanno, Sumana Paduka, Kantamanee Prempetch, Thammasak Chanphol, Bualookkaew Sakchatchawan, Sangutid Thongsawad","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00916-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to develop a model for predicting the bladder volume ratio between daily CBCT and CT to determine adequate bladder filling in patients undergoing treatment for prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The model was trained using 465 datasets obtained from 34 prostate cancer patients. A total of 16 features were collected as input data, which included basic patient information, patient health status, blood examination laboratory results, and specific radiation therapy information. The ratio of the bladder volume between daily CBCT (dCBCT) and planning CT (pCT) was used as the model response. The model was trained using a bootstrap aggregation (bagging) algorithm with two machine learning (ML) approaches: classification and regression. The model accuracy was validated using other 93 datasets. For the regression approach, the accuracy of the model was evaluated based on the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). By contrast, the model performance of the classification approach was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy scores. The ML model showed promising results in the prediction of the bladder volume ratio between dCBCT and pCT, with an RMSE of 0.244 and MAE of 0.172 for the regression approach, sensitivity of 95.24%, specificity of 92.16%, and accuracy of 93.55% for the classification approach. The prediction model could potentially help the radiological technologist determine whether the bladder is full before treatment, thereby reducing the requirement for re-scan CBCT. HIGHLIGHTS: The bagging model demonstrates strong performance in predicting optimal bladder filling. The model achieves promising results with 95.24% sensitivity and 92.16% specificity. It supports therapists in assessing bladder fullness prior to treatment. It helps reduce the risk of requiring repeat CBCT scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00916-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a model for predicting the bladder volume ratio between daily CBCT and CT to determine adequate bladder filling in patients undergoing treatment for prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The model was trained using 465 datasets obtained from 34 prostate cancer patients. A total of 16 features were collected as input data, which included basic patient information, patient health status, blood examination laboratory results, and specific radiation therapy information. The ratio of the bladder volume between daily CBCT (dCBCT) and planning CT (pCT) was used as the model response. The model was trained using a bootstrap aggregation (bagging) algorithm with two machine learning (ML) approaches: classification and regression. The model accuracy was validated using other 93 datasets. For the regression approach, the accuracy of the model was evaluated based on the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). By contrast, the model performance of the classification approach was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy scores. The ML model showed promising results in the prediction of the bladder volume ratio between dCBCT and pCT, with an RMSE of 0.244 and MAE of 0.172 for the regression approach, sensitivity of 95.24%, specificity of 92.16%, and accuracy of 93.55% for the classification approach. The prediction model could potentially help the radiological technologist determine whether the bladder is full before treatment, thereby reducing the requirement for re-scan CBCT. HIGHLIGHTS: The bagging model demonstrates strong performance in predicting optimal bladder filling. The model achieves promising results with 95.24% sensitivity and 92.16% specificity. It supports therapists in assessing bladder fullness prior to treatment. It helps reduce the risk of requiring repeat CBCT scans.

使用机器学习预测前列腺放射治疗中膀胱充盈的决策支持:可行性研究。
本研究旨在建立一种预测每日CBCT和CT之间膀胱体积比的模型,以确定接受外束放射治疗(EBRT)的前列腺癌患者是否有足够的膀胱填充。该模型使用来自34名前列腺癌患者的465个数据集进行训练。共收集了16个特征作为输入数据,包括患者基本信息、患者健康状况、血液检查实验室结果和特定放射治疗信息。膀胱容积与每日CBCT (dCBCT)和计划CT (pCT)之比作为模型反应。该模型使用bootstrap聚合(bagging)算法进行训练,该算法具有两种机器学习(ML)方法:分类和回归。使用其他93个数据集验证了模型的准确性。对于回归方法,基于均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)来评估模型的准确性。相比之下,使用敏感性、特异性和准确性评分来评估分类方法的模型性能。ML模型预测dCBCT与pCT膀胱体积比的结果令人满意,回归方法的RMSE为0.244,MAE为0.172,分类方法的敏感性为95.24%,特异性为92.16%,准确率为93.55%。该预测模型可以潜在地帮助放射技术专家在治疗前确定膀胱是否充满,从而减少重新扫描CBCT的需求。亮点:装袋模型在预测最佳膀胱填充方面表现出色。该模型的灵敏度为95.24%,特异度为92.16%。它支持治疗师在治疗前评估膀胱充盈。它有助于降低需要重复CBCT扫描的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信