Striving to recover - wrist splint or plaster cast : a qualitative study of patients' experience of recovery after a distal radius fracture.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Emma Elizabeth Phelps, Elizabeth Tutton, Jenny Gould, Liz Baird, Juul Achten, Matthew L Costa
{"title":"Striving to recover - wrist splint or plaster cast : a qualitative study of patients' experience of recovery after a distal radius fracture.","authors":"Emma Elizabeth Phelps, Elizabeth Tutton, Jenny Gould, Liz Baird, Juul Achten, Matthew L Costa","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2025-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We sought to explore patients' experience of early recovery from a fracture of the wrist (distal radius). This study was nested in the DRAFT-CASP randomized controlled trial (RCT), which explores the effectiveness of two treatment pathways for patients with a fracture of the distal radius that does not require manipulation: a plaster cast which is removed in fracture clinic, versus a wrist splint that patients remove themselves without returning to hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 21 adults (mean age 58.2 years (SD 13.96), six male), from eight NHS hospitals, four to ten weeks post injury. Interviews were informed by phenomenology and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified the overarching theme 'striving to recover', which conveys patients' determination to get back to normal after a wrist fracture. To recover, patients needed to be comfortable, to adapt, and to be certain that their wrist was healing. Early in their recovery, they were unable to complete their daily activities, experienced pain, loss of strength, worry, and were cautious about using their wrist. Overall, both treatments were considered acceptable. The splint was advantageous for the freedom and control it provided. The cast was valued for the protection and safety it provided. Both groups required more information and reassurance, but had varied views on the need for follow-up appointments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The splint made life easier for patients and was an acceptable treatment. Patients wanted reassurance that their wrist was healing, but they felt this could be achieved in a variety of ways. Most patients coped without a follow-up appointment. Innovative ways to maximize recovery are required. These include support for patients to, manage their pain and provide comfort, be able to adapt, and feel certain of healing. Sharing patients' experiences may help future patients to make informed treatment and recovery decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 6","pages":"626-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2025-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: We sought to explore patients' experience of early recovery from a fracture of the wrist (distal radius). This study was nested in the DRAFT-CASP randomized controlled trial (RCT), which explores the effectiveness of two treatment pathways for patients with a fracture of the distal radius that does not require manipulation: a plaster cast which is removed in fracture clinic, versus a wrist splint that patients remove themselves without returning to hospital.

Methods: Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 21 adults (mean age 58.2 years (SD 13.96), six male), from eight NHS hospitals, four to ten weeks post injury. Interviews were informed by phenomenology and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: We identified the overarching theme 'striving to recover', which conveys patients' determination to get back to normal after a wrist fracture. To recover, patients needed to be comfortable, to adapt, and to be certain that their wrist was healing. Early in their recovery, they were unable to complete their daily activities, experienced pain, loss of strength, worry, and were cautious about using their wrist. Overall, both treatments were considered acceptable. The splint was advantageous for the freedom and control it provided. The cast was valued for the protection and safety it provided. Both groups required more information and reassurance, but had varied views on the need for follow-up appointments.

Conclusion: The splint made life easier for patients and was an acceptable treatment. Patients wanted reassurance that their wrist was healing, but they felt this could be achieved in a variety of ways. Most patients coped without a follow-up appointment. Innovative ways to maximize recovery are required. These include support for patients to, manage their pain and provide comfort, be able to adapt, and feel certain of healing. Sharing patients' experiences may help future patients to make informed treatment and recovery decisions.

努力恢复-手腕夹板或石膏石膏:对桡骨远端骨折后患者恢复经验的定性研究。
目的:我们试图探讨腕部(桡骨远端)骨折患者早期康复的经验。该研究嵌套在DRAFT-CASP随机对照试验(RCT)中,该试验探讨了两种治疗方法对桡骨远端骨折不需要操作的患者的有效性:在骨折诊所拆除石膏石膏,与患者无需返回医院自行拆除腕夹板。方法:对8家NHS医院受伤后4 - 10周的21名成年人(平均年龄58.2岁(SD 13.96), 6名男性)进行定性访谈。访谈采用现象学,并采用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:我们确定了“努力恢复”的总体主题,传达了患者在腕关节骨折后恢复正常的决心。为了恢复,患者需要舒适,适应,并确定他们的手腕正在愈合。在康复早期,他们无法完成日常活动,经历疼痛、力量丧失、担忧,并且对使用手腕持谨慎态度。总的来说,两种治疗方法都是可以接受的。夹板对它提供的自由和控制是有利的。铸型因其提供的保护和安全而受到重视。两组人都需要更多的信息和保证,但对后续预约的必要性有不同的看法。结论:夹板使患者生活更轻松,是一种可接受的治疗方法。患者希望确保他们的手腕正在愈合,但他们认为这可以通过多种方式实现。大多数患者在没有后续预约的情况下应对。需要创新的方法来最大限度地恢复。这些包括支持病人,控制他们的痛苦,提供安慰,能够适应,并感到一定的愈合。分享患者的经验可能有助于未来的患者做出明智的治疗和康复决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信