Surgical stabilization of rib fractures in conjunction with veno-venous ECMO for traumatic chest wall injury: a multi-institutional case series from the Chest Wall Injury Society (CWIS).

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001658
John A Farag, Daniel Stoltz, Stephanie Jensen, Sean Dieffenbaugher, Aneyesis D Gonzalez-Suarez, Samuel Ross, Gaurav Sachdev, Amer Afaneh, Jamie Tung, Joseph D Forrester
{"title":"Surgical stabilization of rib fractures in conjunction with veno-venous ECMO for traumatic chest wall injury: a multi-institutional case series from the Chest Wall Injury Society (CWIS).","authors":"John A Farag, Daniel Stoltz, Stephanie Jensen, Sean Dieffenbaugher, Aneyesis D Gonzalez-Suarez, Samuel Ross, Gaurav Sachdev, Amer Afaneh, Jamie Tung, Joseph D Forrester","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rib fractures are prevalent in 10% of blunt injury admissions and contribute significantly to trauma-related mortality. Severe cases, such as flail segments or multiple displaced fractures, frequently necessitate surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) to mitigate pain and improve outcomes. Pulmonary contusions, present in about 25% of chest wall injuries, can be exacerbated by severe rib fractures, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome. These cases can lead to a combination of therapies-SSRF and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO)-that is rarely reported and without guidelines. Here we present the identified cases of patients undergoing SSRF on VV-ECMO highlighting the potential synergy of these two therapies to achieve favorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Chest Wall Injury Society queried its membership to identify cases where both SSRF and VV-ECMO were used concurrently. Five patients from three trauma centers were identified. Data on patient demographics, injury mechanisms, treatment timelines, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive analysis was planned given the low number of anticipated patients. IRB approval was sought and determined exempt by the Stanford IRB as no identifiable information was presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised five male patients aged 20-50s, primarily injured in vehicular collisions. Median Injury Severity Score was 34. Median number of fractured ribs was 11 (range: 9-15) and four patients had clinical flail chest. ECMO cannulation occurred on median day 0, and SSRF was performed on median day 4 postinjury. Median duration of ECMO was 19 days, and hospital stay was 49 days. All patients underwent tracheostomy, and four developed pulmonary infections. Despite these complications, all patients survived, with three discharged home and two to skilled nursing facilities. No rib-related readmissions were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integration of SSRF and VV-ECMO presents a viable therapeutic strategy for severely injured trauma patients. Although further research is needed, this approach holds promise for improving outcomes in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"e001658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rib fractures are prevalent in 10% of blunt injury admissions and contribute significantly to trauma-related mortality. Severe cases, such as flail segments or multiple displaced fractures, frequently necessitate surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) to mitigate pain and improve outcomes. Pulmonary contusions, present in about 25% of chest wall injuries, can be exacerbated by severe rib fractures, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome. These cases can lead to a combination of therapies-SSRF and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO)-that is rarely reported and without guidelines. Here we present the identified cases of patients undergoing SSRF on VV-ECMO highlighting the potential synergy of these two therapies to achieve favorable outcomes.

Methods: The Chest Wall Injury Society queried its membership to identify cases where both SSRF and VV-ECMO were used concurrently. Five patients from three trauma centers were identified. Data on patient demographics, injury mechanisms, treatment timelines, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive analysis was planned given the low number of anticipated patients. IRB approval was sought and determined exempt by the Stanford IRB as no identifiable information was presented.

Results: The cohort comprised five male patients aged 20-50s, primarily injured in vehicular collisions. Median Injury Severity Score was 34. Median number of fractured ribs was 11 (range: 9-15) and four patients had clinical flail chest. ECMO cannulation occurred on median day 0, and SSRF was performed on median day 4 postinjury. Median duration of ECMO was 19 days, and hospital stay was 49 days. All patients underwent tracheostomy, and four developed pulmonary infections. Despite these complications, all patients survived, with three discharged home and two to skilled nursing facilities. No rib-related readmissions were reported.

Conclusion: Integration of SSRF and VV-ECMO presents a viable therapeutic strategy for severely injured trauma patients. Although further research is needed, this approach holds promise for improving outcomes in selected patients.

肋骨骨折手术稳定联合静脉-静脉ECMO治疗外伤性胸壁损伤:来自胸壁损伤协会(CWIS)的多机构病例系列。
简介:肋骨骨折在10%的钝性损伤住院患者中普遍存在,并显著导致创伤相关死亡率。严重的病例,如连枷节段或多处移位骨折,通常需要手术稳定肋骨骨折(SSRF)来减轻疼痛和改善结果。肺挫伤约占胸壁损伤的25%,严重的肋骨骨折可加重肺挫伤,导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征。这些病例可能导致联合治疗- ssrf和静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)-很少报道,也没有指南。在这里,我们介绍了在VV-ECMO中接受SSRF治疗的确诊病例,强调了这两种治疗的潜在协同作用,以获得良好的结果。方法:胸壁损伤学会查询其会员,以确定同时使用SSRF和VV-ECMO的病例。来自三个创伤中心的5名患者被确认。收集了患者人口统计学、损伤机制、治疗时间表和结果的数据。考虑到预期患者数量较少,计划进行描述性分析。由于没有提供可识别信息,斯坦福大学IRB寻求并确定了豁免。结果:该队列包括5名年龄在20-50岁之间的男性患者,主要在车辆碰撞中受伤。损伤严重程度评分中位数为34。骨折肋骨中位数为11根(范围:9-15根),4例患者有临床连枷胸。ECMO插管中位时间为第0天,SSRF中位时间为第4天。ECMO中位持续时间为19天,住院时间为49天。所有患者均行气管切开术,其中4例发生肺部感染。尽管有这些并发症,所有患者都存活了下来,其中3人出院回家,2人到熟练的护理机构。没有肋骨相关的再入院报告。结论:SSRF联合VV-ECMO治疗严重创伤是一种可行的治疗策略。虽然需要进一步的研究,但这种方法有望改善选定患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信